Methodological and methodical foundations for studying meta-cognitive determinants of activity
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

meta-cognitivism
meta-cognitive processes
meta-cognitive qualities
activity mediation
activity probing
reflection
meta-cognitive monitoring
factor research
ecological validity
meta-cognitive phenomena

Abstract

Modern meta-cognitivism has formulated certain key methodological and methodical problems but left them unsolved. To overcome this limitation this paper presents a new methodological approach to studying meta-cognitive determinants of activity – the principle of activity-mediated research of meta-cognitive processes and personality traits.
This approach provided a basis for elaborating the complex of new research techniques for revealing the features of the meta-cognitive regulation of activity: (a) the technique of “activity probing”, (b) the technique of “style differentiation”, (c) the technique of “reflective stratification”, and (d) the technique of “factorial decompositions”. These techniques are constructive means for obtaining ecologically valid data on the specificity of the meta-cognitive regulation of activity.
The paper brings forward the results of studies with the application of these techniques. By using these techniques, the explication of many new and previously undescribed features of the meta-cognitive regulation of activity becomes possible. In particular, generative synergistic effects resulting from synthesizing the key metacognitive processes and factors were revealed and interpreted. The two main types of meta-processes – meta-cognitive and meta-regulative – had facilitative (i. e. synergistic) associations in the structure of activity. This considerably expands the general cognitiveregulating potential of a subject. This finding also supports the resource approach to the interpretation of meta-cognitive factors. The results of the study determined general directions in approaching one of the most important problems of modern meta-cognitivism – overcoming its out-of-activity nature and, accordingly, its synthesis with the psychological theory of activity.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2017.1.10
PDF (Russian)

References

Barabanshchikov V. A. The psyche’s system organization and development. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2003, V. 24, no. 1, pp. 29–46 (in Russian).
Velichkovskii B. M. Kognitivnaya nauka. Osnovy psikhologii poznaniya [Cognitive science: Fundamentals of the psychology of cognition]. Akademiya Publ., 2006. 448 p.
Karpov A. V. Psikhologiya deyatel'nosti [Activity psychology]. Moscow, RAE Publ., 2015.
Karpov A. V. Psikhologiya soznaniya. Metasistemnyi podkhod [Consciousness psychology: A meta-system approach]. Moscow, RAE Publ., 2011. 1070 p.
Karpov A. V. Refleksivnaya determinatsiya deyatel'nosti i lichnosti [The reflective determination of activity and personality]. Moscow, RAE Publ., 2013. 510 p.
Karpov A. V., Karpov A. A., Markova E. V. Psikhologiya prinyatiya resheniya v upravlencheskoi deyatel'nosti [The psychology of decision making in management]. Moscow, RAE Publ., 2016.
Karpov A. V., Skityaeva I. M. Psikhologiya metakognitivnykh protsessov lichnosti [The psychology of the individual's meta-cognitive processes]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2005. 325 p.
Druzhinin V. N., Ushakova D. V. (eds.) Kognitivnaya psikhologiya [Cognitive psychology]. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2002. 478 p.
Kozeletskii Yu. Psikhologicheskaya teoriya reshenii [Psychological decision theory]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1979. 504 p.
Mental'naya reprezentatsiya [Mental representation]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 1998. 320 p.
Neisser U. Cognition and reality. San Francisco, Freeman, 1976. (Russ. ed.: Naisser U. Poznanie i real'nost'. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981. 230 p.).
Kholodnaya M. A. Kognitivnye stili: O prirode individual'nogo uma [Cognitive styles: On the nature of the individual mind]. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2002. 304 p.
Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Intelligence psychology: paradoxes of research]. Moscow, Bars Publ., 1997. 391 p.
Shadrikov V. D. Mental'noe razvitie cheloveka [Human mental development]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press, 2007.
Borkowski J. G., Carr M., Rellinger E., Pressley M. Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In: Jones B. F., Idol L. (eds.) Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, pp. 31–43.
Brown A. L. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert F. E., Kluwe R. H. (eds.) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987, pp. 65–116.
Kolb S. K. Metacognition Metaphors. N. Y., 1995. 185 p.
Yzerbyt V. et al. (eds.) Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions. SAGE Publications, 2002. 253 p.
Nelson T. O. (ed.) Metacognition: Core Readings. Boston, Allen and Bacon, 1992. 520 р.
Metcalfe J., Shimamura A. P. (eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1994. 323 р.
Bogdan R. J. (ed.) Minding Mind. London, MIT Press, 2000. 215 p.
Nelson T. O., Narens L. A new technique for investigating the feeling of knowing. Acta Psychologica, 1980, 46, pp. 69–90.
Nelson T. O., Narens L. Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower G. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York, Academic Press, 1990, V. 26, pp. 125–141.
Perfect T. J., Schwartz B. L. Applied Metacognition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 220 p.
Perkins R., Salomon B. Metacognition and Control Strategies Revised. Social Psychology Journal, 1987, V. 3, pp. 13–18.