Technique for Studying Motivation Toward Scientific Activity: Development and Practical Application



Ключевые слова:

psychodiagnostic technique, motivation toward scientific activity, research professionals, meta-system approach, subsystems, diagnostic scales, item analysis, reliability, validity, normalization of results


Introduction. As our analysis has shown, the literature offers very few publications that address the issue of diagnosing motives for scientific activity in adult research professionals. Being guided by the principles of the meta-system approach, we developed the concept of motivation toward scientific activity as a theoretical foundation for the appropriate diagnostic technique. According to this concept, motivation toward scientific activity includes 10 various motivational subsystems (groups of motives) such as external, internal, value, cognitive, reflexive, and indirect ones, competition-, security-, and achievement-related motives, and anti-motivation. These subsystems are reflected in the corresponding scales of the developed technique.

Methods. A total of 944 research professionals at various research institutes, including universities, and commercial scientific organizations from different cities of the Russian Federation participated in this study. Exploratory factor analysis was employed to select tasks for the technique.

Results. The final version included 70 items (7 for each of the 10 scales), of which 25,71% were ‘reverse-worded’ and 74,29% were ‘positive-worded’. The technique met the criteria of test-retest reliability (r= .899, р = .001), half-split reliability (Spearman–Brown: r= .822, p = .001; Rulon: r= .814, p = .01), and internal consistency reliability (r= .814, p≤ .05). The authors determined empirical validity of the technique by examining the relationship between scientific productivity and motivation. The Motivational Profile test by W. Richie and P. Martin was instrumental in testing construct validity. A Shapiro–Wilk test showed that the scores for each scale were normally distributed, which made it possible to use sten-score scales.

Discussion. The practice of psychological support of research activity at the RAS research institutes and R&D commercial organizations enabled authors to provide recommendations for chiefs, psychologists, and human resource managers for managing and optimizing the structure and level of motivation among research workers and increasing their labour productivity.


Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Библиографические ссылки

Zhdanko A. P. Development of students’ motivation and meaning sphere by means of self-actualization during English class. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2018, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 77–91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2018.1.4

Gor'kovaya I. A., Bakanova A. A. The role of motivational and meaning component of education in the formation of competence of masters psychologists. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie – Psychological Science
and Education, 2015, Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–14 (in Russian).

Yurevich A. V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya nauchnoi deyatel'nosti [Social psychology of scientific activity]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 2013. 447 p.

Frigotto M. L., Riccaboni M. A few special cases: scientific creativity and network dynamics in the field of rare diseases. Scientometrics, 2011, Vol. 89, pp. 397–420.

Clement J. J. Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students. The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 2008. 601 p.

Arzenšek A., Košmrlj K., Širca N. T. Slovenian young researchers’ motivation for knowledge transfer. Higher education, 2014, Vol. 68 (2), pp. 185–206.

Glynn S. M., Brickman P., Armstrong N., Taasoobshirazi G. Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation With Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 2011, Vol. 48 (10), pp. 1159–1176.

Volodarskaya E. A. Image of science: From reflection to action. Voprosy psikhologii, 2011, no. 11, pp. 100–114 (in Russian).

Temnova L. V., Shevchenko O. A. Motivation toward scientific activity in modern scientists of various generations. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya – Sociology of Education, 2012, no. 4, pp. 73–85 (in Russian).

Mazaletskaya A. L. Dinamika motivatsii nauchno-issledovatel'skoi deyatel'nosti na etapakh professionalizatsii [Dynamics of motivation toward research activity at the stages of professionalization]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.). Yaroslavl, 2011. 217 p.

Karpov A. V., Karpov A. A., Subbotina L. Yu. Methodological and methodical foundations for studying meta-cognitive determinants of activity. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2017, Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 108–123 (in Russian).

Amabile T. M., Hill K. G., Hennessey B. A., Tighe E. M. The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, no. 66, pp. 950–967.

Hrakhouskaya M., van Schuppen H.-J. Development of a conceptual framework of motivators for professionals in a multicultural organization with a hybrid R&D structure: How to avoid carrot management, 2011. Available
at: (Accessed 11 April 2016).

McAllister R. B., Vandlen C. E. Motivating employees in R&D. Cornell HR Review, 2010. Available at: (Accessed 11 April 2016).

Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, no. 42, pp. 116–131.

Litman J. A. Spielberger C. D. Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of personality assessment, 2003, Vol. 80 (1), pp. 75–86.

Iyer U. J. Kamalanabhan T. J. Achievement motivation and performance of scientists in research and development organizations. Journal of Scientific & Indastrial Reserch, 2006, no. 65, pp. 187–194.

Mehta M. Chugh G. Achievement Motivation and Adjustment in Members of Indian Scientific Expedition to Antarctica. Psychological Studies, 2011, Vol. 56 (4), pp. 404–409.

Hofstede G. Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 1980, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 42–63.

Elliot A. J. The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 2006, no. 30, pp. 111–116. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7

Malhotra D. The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, Vol. 111 (2), pp. 139–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.005

Boudreau K. J., Lacetera N., Lakhani K. R. Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis. Management science, 2011, Vol. 57 (5), pp. 843–863. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322

Yaroshevskii M.G. Opponentnyi krug i nauchnoe otkrytie [Opponent circle and scientific discovery]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of Philosophy, 1983, no. 10, pp. 49–61 (in Russian).

Garcia S. M., Tor A., Schiff T. M. The Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013, Vol. 8 (6), pp. 634–650. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613504114

Martin M. W. Moral Creativity in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2006, no. 12, pp. 421–433.

Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, no. 11, pp. 227–268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PL I1104_01

Vallerand R. J. From motivation to passion: In search of the motivational processes involved in a meaningful life. Canadian Psychology, 2012, Vol. 53 (1), pp. 42–52. DOI: 10.1037/a0026377

Mayer J. D., Faber M. A., Xiaoyan X. Seventy-five years of motivation measures (1930–2005): A descriptive analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 2007, no. 31, pp. 83–103.

Karpova E. V. Struktura i genezis motivatsionnoi sfery lichnosti v uchebnoi deyatel'nosti [Structure and genesis of motivational sphere of personality in educational activity]. Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University,
2007. 570 p.

Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics (4th edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000. 983 p.

Pel'ts D., Endryus F. Uchenye v organizatsiyakh: Ob optimal'nykh usloviyakh dlya issledovanii i razrabotok [Scientists in organizations: The optimum conditions for research in organizations and development]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1973. 472 p.

Iyer U. J., Kamalanabhan T. J. Achievement motivation and performance of scientists in research and development organizations. Journal of Scientific & Indastrial Reserch, 2006, no. 65, pp. 187–194.

Karpov A. V., Razina T. V. Features of the scientific activity motivation of employees in R&D commercial firms in the field of scientific research and development work. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki – Proceedings of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 2014, no. 4 (29), pp. 15–20 (in Russian).

Kiselev M. V., Razina T. V. Motivation toward scientific activity in teaching staff of KSTU. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Kostroma State Technological University, 2014, no. 2 (33), pp. 3–10 (in Russian).

Razina T. V., Golikova N. S. Features of motivation toward scientific activity in young people taking master and postgraduate courses. Psikhologiya obucheniya – Psychology of Education, 2014, no. 6, pp. 58–73 (in Russian).




Как цитировать

Karpov, A. V., & Razina, T. V. (2018). Technique for Studying Motivation Toward Scientific Activity: Development and Practical Application. Российский психологический журнал, 15(2/1), 57–68.



Экспериментальная психология