Abstract
This paper considers the issues, which are concerned with a new concept of antifragility. Quite recently, considerable attention has been paid to the concept of antifragility. Antifragility gains a special importance in studying psychological characteristics which enable to cope with stress, overcome life difficulties, and be tolerant of uncertainty (T. N. Kornilova, 2015; D. A. Leontiev, 2015). N. Taleb (2014)
defines antifragility as an attribute of living systems, which manifests itself in the use of any stressors for the benefit of development. This study attempts to demonstrate a common factor of antifragility at the psychometric level when “measuring” several psychological characteristics such as hardiness, tolerance of ambiguity, psychological
wellbeing, and coping strategies. The authors (a) offer a brief theoretical overview of the concepts considering human
development as the result of overcoming (crises, difficulties), (b) distinguish the concepts of endurance and antifragility, and (c) consider antifragility as a generalized concept of various psychological phenomena related to “improving through challenges”.
A small mixed-age sample of respondents demonstrated that antifragility was most closely associated with parameters of hardiness, tolerance of ambiguity, and psychological wellbeing. Antifragility was less associated with coping strategies. The respondents who scored high on antifragility (a) realized it at the level of selfappraisal,
(b) had a pronounced risk-taking, sense of control and control over the
environment, (c) emphasized the presence of life goals, (d) calmly perceived uncertain situations, (e) were able to see a positive side of uncertainty, and (f) were generally inclined to a positive reappraisal of difficulties. The factor analysis of the studied parameters clearly revealed a single factor. The basic load was distributed between
the parameters of dispositional antifragility, hardiness, personal growth, and tolerance of ambiguity. The authors draw conclusions about (a) the presence of a common factor of antifragility at the psychometric level and (b) the easiness of differentiation
of the concepts of endurance and antifragility in respondents’ representations.
References
Vindeker O. S., Klimenskikh M. V., Berdnikova D. V. Issledovanie dispozitsionnoi motivatsii dostizheniia v sviazi s ekzistentsial'noi ispolnennost'iu (na primere studencheskoi vyborki) [Studying the dispositional achievement motivation in connection with existential fulfillment (on example of a student sample)]. Izvestiia Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriia 1. Problemy obrazovaniia, nauki i kul'tury – Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 1. Problems of education, science, and culture, 2015, no. 4 (144), pp. 107–112.
Vygotskii L. S. Psikhologiia razvitiia cheloveka [The psychology of human development]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2005. 1136 p.
Zinchenko V. P. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti: novost' ili psikhologicheskaia traditsiia? [Tolerance of ambiguity: the news or a psychological tradition?]. Voprosy psikhologii – Approaches to Psychology, 2007, pp. 3–20.
Kornilova T. V. A new questionnaire of tolerance / intolerance of ambiguity. Available at: http://www.cognitivepsy.ru/Pubs/2010_NTN_Kornilova.pdf
Kornilova T. V. Printsip neopredelennosti v psikhologii vybora i riska [The ambiguity principle in the psychology of choice and risk]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia – Psychological Research, 2015, V. 8, no. 40.
Kriukova T. L., Kuftiak T. L. Oprosnik sposobov sovladaniia (adaptatsiia metodiki WCQ) [Mechanisms of coping questionnaire (adaptation of the WCQ technique)]. Zhurn. prakticheskogo psikhologa – Journal of the Practical Psychologist, 2007, no. 3, pp. 93–112.
Leont'ev D. A. Vyzov neopredelennosti kak tsentral'naia problema psikhologii lichnosti [Challenge to uncertainty as the central problem of personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia – Psychological Research, 2015, V. 8, no. 40.
Leont'ev D. A. Simbioz i adaptatsiia ili avtonomiia i transtsendentsiia: vybor lichnosti v nepredskazuemom mire. Lichnost' v sovremennom mire: ot strategii vyzhivaniia k strategii zhiznetvorchestva [Symbiosis and adaptation or autonomy and transcendence: the choice of the person in an unpredictable world: The person in the modern world: from the strategy of survival to the strategy of life creation]. Kemerovo, 2002, pp. 3–34.
Leont'ev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestoikosti [The test of hardiness]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006. 63 p.
Lepeshinskii N. N. Adaptatsiia oprosnika «Shkala psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiia» K. Riff [Adaptation of the “Scale of psychological well-being” questionnaire of K. Riff]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2007, pp. 24–37.
Magomed-Eminov M., Kvasova O., Savina O. Posttravmaticheskii rost kak model' reagirovaniia na geopoliticheskii krizis [Post-traumatic growth as a model of the response to a geopolitical crisis]. Sovremennye issledovaniia sotsial'nykh problem – Modern Research of Social Problems, 2015, no. 1 (21), pp. 5–25.
Magomed-Eminov M. Sh. Triada «Rasstroistvo – Stoikost' – Rost» kak posledstviia ekstremal'noi situatsii [The “Disorder – Endurance – Growth” triad as consequences of extreme situations]. Akmeologiia – Acmeology, 2009, no. 1, pp. 53–63.
Maslow A. New frontiers of human nature (Russ. ed.: Maslou A., Novye rubezhi chelovecheskoi prirody. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 1999. 425 p.).
Allport G. The formation of personality (Russ. ed.: Olport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002. 462 p.).
Petrovskii V. A. Ideia svobodnoi prichinnosti v psikhologii lichnosti: Psikhologiia lichnosti v trudakh otechestvennykh psikhologov [The idea of free causality in personality psychology: Personality psychology in works of Russian psychologists]. St. Petersburg, 2000, pp. 436–448.
Rasskazova E. I., Gordeeva T. O. Coping strategies in the psychology of stress: approaches, methods, and prospects. Available at: http://psystudy.ru
Taleb N. N. Antikhrupkost'. Kak izvlech' vygodu iz khaosa [Antifragility. How to derive a benefit from chaos]. Moscow, Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2014. 768 p.
Frankl V. Man's Search for Meaning (Russ. ed.: Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 367 p.).
Hjelle L., Ziegler D. Personality theories (Russ. ed.: Kh'ell L., Zigler D. Teorii lichnosti. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 1997, pp. 528–573).
El'konin D. B. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1989.
Erikson E. Identity: youth and crisis (Russ. ed.: Erikson E. Identichnost': iunost' i krizis. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2001. 344 p.).
Dekel S., Ein-Dor T. & Solomon Z. Posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic distress: A longitudinal study. Psychological Trauma, 2012, 4 (1), pp. 194–101.
Tedeschi R. G. & Calhoun L. G. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1996, 9, pp. 455–472.