Abstract
In the first part of this article the paradigm was defined as the contrast of the narradigm. Historical period of the paradigm is divided into lengths which are called the phases of the paradigm: heuristical, magical, philosophical, scientific and the phase of astroregulation. In the first part of the article we described the heuristical and magical phases of the paradigm.In the final part of the article we continue to discuss the role of magic in the genesis of natural sciences. The author deals with pre-history psychology, in particular, its occulted and demonical inclination. The definitions of philosophical, scientific and astroregulation phases are given. In conclusion the author supposes the possibility of the enlargement of the family of “digms” through the medium of the narradigm, videodigm and audiodigm.
References
Вольтер Ф. Философские сочинения. Пер. с фр., М., «Наука», 1989.
Гарэн Э. Проблемы итальянского Возрождения. Пер. с итал., М., «Прогресс», 1986.
Кант И. Сочинения, т.4, ч.1. Пер. с нем., М., «Мысль», 1964.
Кассирер Э. Избранное. Опыт о человеке. Пер. с нем., М., «Гардарика», 1998.
Фёдоров Н.Ф. Сочинения. М., «Мысль», 1982.
Фрэзер Дж. Золотая ветвь. Пер. с англ., М., «Наука», 1986.
Эббингауз Г. Очерк психологии. // Эббингауз Г., Бэн А. Ассоциативная психология.
Пер. с нем. и англ., М., АСТ, 1998.
Foucault M. Surveilleur et punir. Naissance de la prison. P., 1975.
Lash S. Critique of Information. L., 2002.
Madsen K B A History of Psychology in Metascientiic Perspective. Amsterdam, 1988.
Wetherick N. E. Exploration vs pseudo elucidation in psychology //Theory & Psychology,
, v.10 (5), 689-697.
Zinguer I, Schott H.(eds.) Systèmes de pensée précartésiens. P., 1998.