Abstract
The authors analyzed the problems of the formation of personal maturity and made an assumption that the components of personal maturity (ego-identity, active possession of the environment, and self-actualization) would be formed atthe age of seven or eight.
The paper presents the results of a longitudinal study of the components ofpersonal maturity. The longitudinal group included 232 pupils of the rst form of comprehensive schools of Samara and Tolyatti; 96 persons of them took part in all the longitudinal sections of the study. The authors carried out the rst study in 1997–1998, when the respondents were pupils of the rst form. In the nal study (2014–2015) all the subjects graduated from high schools, as well as higher/
secondary educational institutions (at the age from 24 to 25).
To study the components of personal maturity the authors asked respondents to write a composition with the following title: “I Am a Human Being”, and also used the method of ultimate senses by D. A. Leont’ev, content analysis, and method of expert evaluations.
The study showed that the formation of personal maturity takes place when dealing with life’s challenges and building relationships with the world (society). Theperson realizes himself/herself, generates an image of a human being as abearer of social roles, recognizes his/her own involvement in culture and inuences himself/herself and others through various forms of internal and external activity; he/she
is the author of the inner world. The results of the empirical study showed that the developed ego-identity, active possession of the environment (the ability to behave regardless the inuencing circumstances and pursue his/her own aims), and selfactualization
were the components of personal maturity. These components are
basically formed at the age of seven or eight.
The ndings of the study could be useful for psychologists, pedagogues, and social workers. The basic propositions of this paper have great potential for correctional and developing work of a school psychologist for optimizing the educational process.
References
Bratus’ B. S. Anomalii lichnosti [Anomalies of personality]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1988. 301 p.
Gudzovskaia A. A. Psikhologiia sotsial’noi zrelosti [The psychology of social maturity]. Samara, 2014. 256 p.
Kon I. S. V poiskakh sebia: Lichnost’ i ee samosoznanie [In search of self: Personality and self-consciousness]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1984. 335 p.
Kotliakov V. Iu. Metodika issledovaniia sistemy zhiznennykh smyslov [The technique for studying the system of life senses]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2003, pp. 18–21.
Kuhn M., Mc. Partland T. Empiricheskoe issledovanie ustanovok lichnosti na sebia // Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia sotsial'naia psikhologiia: teksty [The empirical study of self-attitudes of the person. Modern foreign social psychology: texts]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1984, pp. 180–187.
Leont’ev A. N. Lektsii po obshchei psikhologii [Lectures on general psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001. 511 p.
Leont’ev D. A. Metodika predel’nykh smyslov (MPS) [The technique of ultimate senses]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 1992. 36 p.
Leont’ev D. A. Psikhologiia smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real’nosti [The psychology of sense: nature, structure and dynamics of sense reality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2003. 487 p.
Leont’ev D. A. Samorealizatsiia i sushchnostnye sily cheloveka // Psikhologiia s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaia perspektiva postsovetskoi psikhologii [Self-realization and essential forces of the person. Psychology with a human face: humanistic perspective in post-Soviet psychology]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 156–175.
Loginova N. A. Zhiznennyi put’ cheloveka kak problema psikhologii [Life path as a problem of psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii – Approaches to Psychology, 1985, no. 1, pp. 103–109.
Loginova N. A. Psikhobiograficheskii metod issledovaniia i korrektsii lichnosti [Psychobiographical method of studying and correction of personality]. Almaty, Kazak University Publ., 2001. 176 p.
Seryi A. V. Sistema lichnostnykh smyslov: struktura, funktsii, dinamika [The system of personal senses: structure, functions, and dynamics]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2004. 272 p.
Soldatova E. L., Shliapnikova I. A. Ego-identichnost’ kak sistemoobrazuiushchii faktor formirovaniia lichnostnoi zrelosti [Ego-identity as a system-forming factor of personal maturity formation]. Vestnik Iuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia – Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology, 2010, no. 27 (203), pp. 66–74.
Kharlamenkova N. E. Spontannost’ i kontrol’ v zrelykh lichnostnykh otnosheniiakh // Fenomen i kategoriia zrelosti v psikhologii [Spontaneity and control in mature personal relationships. The phenomenon and category of maturity in psychology]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Science Publ., 2007, pp. 128–148.
Shchukina M. A. Psikhologiia samorazvitiia lichnosti: sub”ektnyi podkhod. Diss. dokt. psikh. nauk [The psychology of personal self-development: a subjective approach. Dr. psych. sci. diss]. St. Petersburg, 2015. 355 p.
Shchukina M. A. Sub”ektnyi podkhod k samorazvitiiu lichnosti: vozmozhnosti teoreticheskogo ponimaniia i empiricheskogo izucheniia [A subjective approach to self-development of the person: theoretical understanding and empirical study]. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 7–22.
Maslow A. Religions, Values, and Peak-Experiences. N. Y., Viking press, 1970, 123 p.
Rokeach M. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1969, 214 p.
Royce J. R., Powell A. Theory of personality and individual differences: factors, systems and processes. Englewood Cliffs (N. J.), Prentice-Hall, 1983, 304 p.