Characteristics of Lifeworlds in Male and Female Youths at Different Age Periods
PDF
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

lifeworld
internal world simplicity/complexity
external world easiness/difficulty
male youths
female youths
adolescence
young adulthood
distance of social groups
subjective well-being
meaningful objects

Abstract

Introduction. The transition from adolescence to young adulthood is an important stage in personality development, which changes the perception of the surrounding reality and lifeworld. Yet, little is known about this issue. This paper is the first report on the characteristics of lifeworld in male and female youths of different age groups. This study is based on the concept of F. Ye. Vasilyuk, who distinguished external and internal perspectives of lifeworld and their main characteristics (easiness/difficulty of the external world; simplicity/complexity of the internal world).

Methods. The study used the technique for graphic representation of the vital psychological space (by G. V. Shukova) to assess the multi-component nature of the world as a criterion of its simplicity/complexity. To assess lifeworld easiness/difficulty the following diagnostic tools were used: (a) a modified version of the inventory for assessing the subjective distance of need-related objects by A. B. Kupreichenko; (b) the Questionnaire on the Value-Accessibility Ratio in Various Life Areas developed by E. B. Fantalova to determine the subjective difficulty of achieving meaningful objects; and (c) the questionnaire for assessing global life satisfaction and subjective level of happiness for an overall assessment of the subjective difficulty of the world.

Results. The findings indicated that males and females aged 16–17 have similar lifeworlds in terms of the internal world simplicity/complexity and the external world easiness/difficulty. At the age of 18–22, females have a more complex and differentiated internal world. In males the space of lifeworld is simplified by this age. At this age differences manifest themselves in the fact females are less happy and satisfied with life, which is associated with an increase in the subjective difficulty of lifeworld.

Discussion. Male and female youths’ lifeworld restructuring is associated with different ways in which they transform subjective reality.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.1.3
PDF
PDF (Russian)

References

Arendachuk, I. V. (2018). Value-based meaningful factors of social activity of youth under different conditions of life activities. Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika (Izvestiya of Saratov University. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy), 18(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-4-425-432 (in Russ.).

Bengtsson, J. (2013). Guest editorial: Special edition on the lifeworld approach for empirical research in education – the Gothenburg tradition. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 13, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2013.13.2.2.1176

Boryaz, V. N. (1973). Youth: Methodological problems of research. Leningrad: Nauka. (in Russ.).

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19

Demidova, I. F. (2012). Age dynamics of the content of different types of lifeworld. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem (Modern Studies of Social Issues), 1–1, 177–180. (in Russ.).

Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18

Fantalova, E. B. (2011). Questionnaire on the Value-Accessibility Ratio in Various Life Areas: A psychometric study. Mir psikhologii (World of Psychology), 2, 228–243. (in Russ.).

Gentry, L. A., Chung, J. J., Aung, N., Keller, S., Heinrich, K. M., & Maddock, J. E. (2007). Gender differences in stress and coping among adults living in Hawai`i. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 5(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.32398/cjhp.v5i2.1235

Gorichanaz, T., Latham, K. F., & Wood, E. (2018). Lifeworld as “unit of analysis”. Journal of Documentation, 74(4), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2017-0174

Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G., & Mal'tseva, A. S. (2016). Typology of Personal Career Choices: Description and psychometric verification results. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Psikhologiya” (Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Psychology), 9(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.14529/psy160202 (in Russ.).

Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-3207-9

Kolomenskaya, V. V., Sklyar, N. A., & Koskina, E. N. (2015). Sexual features of modern youth’s life strategy. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki (Bulletin of Pskov State University. Series: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences), 2, 181–188. (in Russ.).

Kon, I. S. (1989). Psychology of early adolescence. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. (in Russ.).

Kraus, B. (2015). The life we live and the life we experience: Introducing the epistemological difference between “lifeworld” (lebenswelt) and “life conditions” (lebenslage). Social Work and Society, 13(2).

Leont'ev, D. A. (2019). Human being and lifeworld: From ontology to phenomenology. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 15(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150103 (in Russ.).

Lodkin, A. E., & Chetverikova, T. A. (2018). The problem of the meaning of life of student youth as a subject of socio-economic and social transformations. Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki (Sociopolitical Sciences), 2, 299–302. (in Russ.).

Men'shikova, L. V., & Levchenko, E. V. (2015). Psychological features of the students’ lifeworld. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal (Siberian Pedagogical Journal), 4, 156–159. (in Russ.).

Michalos, A. C. (2017). Development of quality of life theory and its instruments. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51149-8

Osipchukova, E. V., & Popova, N. V. (2020). Youths’ vision of their future in terms of subjective well-being. Vestnik pedagogicheskikh innovatsii (Journal of Pedagogical Innovations), 1, 59–68. (in Russ.).

Pavlovskii, V. V. (2001). Juventology as an integrative youth science project. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russ.).

Roecker, C. E., Dubow, E. F., & Donaldson, D. (1996). Cross-situational patterns in children’s coping with observed interpersonal conflict. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2503_5

Sapogova, E. E. (2019). Subjective ontology and the individual’s lifeworld. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 15(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150104 (in Russ.).

Siriwardane-de Zoysa, R., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2016). Putting lifeworlds at sea: Studying meaning-making in marine research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00197

Slobodchikov, V. I., & Isaev, E. I. (2000). Foundations of psychological anthropology. Psychology of human development: Development of subjective reality in ontogenesis. Moscow: Shkol'naya pressa. (in Russ.).

Soldatova, E. L. (2007). Normative crises of an adult’s personality development (Doctoral dissertation). Yekaterinburg. (in Russ.).

Stefanova, N. A., & Krugova, Yu. S. (2019). The lifestyle of modern youth as a threat to the pension system. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie (Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Management), 8(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.26140/anie-2019-0802-0049 (in Russ.).

Shukova, G. V. (2014). Features of the social and psychological space of young counselling psychologists. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 7(33). Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n33/938-shukova33.html (in Russ.).

Vasilyuk, F. E. (1984). The psychology of experiencing. Moscow: MSU. (in Russ.).

Vasilyuk, F. E. (2003). Methodological analysis in psychology. Moscow: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education; Smysl. (in Russ.).

Vasyura, S. A., & Korobeinikova, Ya. P. (2014). Coping strategies among boys and girls of student age and the level of their communicative activity. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal (Kazan Pedagogical Journal), 1, 123–131.

Yaremtchuk, S. V., & Novgorodova, E. F. (2015). Self-development and subjective well-being of the modern youth. Moscow: INFRA-M. (in Russ.).

Zhuravlev, A. L. & Kupreichenko, A. B. (2012). Socio-psychological space of the individual. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS. (in Russ.).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Yaremtchuk S. V., Bakina A. V., Sityaeva S. M.