A Psychometric Study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition in the Russian Federation
PDF (Russian)
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

Bayley-III scales
Bayley-3
neuropsychological development
infants
toddlers psychometric study
adaptation
developmental assessment
complex development
cognitive sphere
motor sphere

Abstract

Introduction. There is currently no universal comprehensive measurement tool for the assessment of children development in the Russian Federation (RF). The Bayley-III scales developed by American researchers are widely used as such a tool. Numerous research groups recognize the need to modify the original scales before using them in a new linguistic and socio-cultural environment.

Methods. The authors (a) translated the original Bayley-III manual into Russian, (b) tested the tool by assessing cognitive, language, and motor development of 163 Russian children aged 2–11 months, and (c) made an indirect comparison of the mean scale scores of neuropsychological development and those obtained from the original American sample of children using Student’s t-test.

Results. The modified version of the Bayley-III manual has been successfully tested in the RF. The indices of language and motor development of the children examined in this study did not statistically differ from the original American data (10 points). Higher scores were obtained for the cognitive scale (10.7 versus 10; p = 0.003). However, this effect was not very pronounced (Cohen’s d = 0.25).

Discussion. The indices of neuropsychological development of Russian children fully comply with the original Bayley-III norms, which opens up new possibilities for its use in the RF. Slightly higher scores of the cognitive scale among Russian children do not generally affect the compliance with the original tool, since the difference was not significant. The results of this study can be extrapolated to full-term Caucasian children aged 2–11 months, whose parents have at least secondary education and average level of earnings. The widespread use of Bayley-III requires its further adaptation in larger and more representative samples of children from different regions of the RF with the additional assessment of social-emotional development as well as adaptive behavior.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2020.4.4
PDF (Russian)
PDF (Russian)

References

Aylward, G. P. (1988). Infant and early childhood assessment. In M. G. Tramontana, S. R. Hooper (Eds.), Assessment issues in child neuropsychology. Critical issues in neuropsychology (pp. 225–248). Boston, MA: Springer. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9301-7_9

Azari, N., Soleimani, F., Vameghi, R., Sajedi, F., Shahshahani, S., Karimi, H., ... Gharib, M. (2017). A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development in Persian language children. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology, 11(1), 50–56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v11i1.12056

Bakushkina, N. I., Kiselev, S. Yu., L'vova, O. A., Suleimanova, E. V., & Tuktareva, I. V. (2018). Use of Bayley-III scales to assess neurocognitive development of children in norm and in pathology. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psikhologiya (Theoretical and Experimental Psychology), 11(1), 85–94. (in Russ.).

Ballot, D. E., Ramdin, T., Rakotsoane, D., Agaba, F., Davies, V. A., Chirwa, T., & Cooper, P. A. (2017). Use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition, to assess developmental outcome in infants and young children in an urban setting in South Africa. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2017, 1–5.

Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

Belousova, M. V., & Shvets, E. V. (2019). The influence of information devices and social environment factors on speech development in early age children. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny (Bulletin of Modern Clinical Medicine), 12(3), 15–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20969/VSKM.2019.12(3).15-20 (in Russ.).

Byers-Heinlein, K., & Lew-Williams, C. (2013). Bilingualism in the early years: What the science says. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(1), 95–112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v7i1.632

Chinta, S., Walker, K., Halliday, R., Loughran-Fowlds, A., & Badawi, N. (2014). A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III). Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(7), 621–624. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304834

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Colombo, J., & Cheatham, C. L. (2006). The emergence and basis of endogenous attention in infancy and early childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 34, 283–322. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(06)80010-8

Colombo, J., & Mitchel, D. W. (2009). Infant visual habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 225–234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.002

Fuiko, R., Oberleitner-Leeb, C., Klebermass-Schrehof, K., Berger, A., Brandstetter, S., & Giordano, V. (2019). The impact of norms on the outcome of children born very-preterm when using the Bayley-III: Differences between US and German norms. Neonatology, 116(1), 29–36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497138

Greenspan, S. I., DeGangi, G., & Wieder, S. (2001). The Functional Emotional Assessment Scale (FEAS): For infancy & early childhood. Interdisciplinary Council on Development & Learning Disorders.

Hanlon, C., Medhin, G., Worku, B., Tomlinson, M., Alem, A., Dewey, M., & Prince, M. (2016). Adapting the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development in Ethiopia: Evaluation of reliability and validity. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(5), 699–708. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12371

Hegde, S., Rao, S. L., Raguram, A., & Gangadhar, B. N. (2013). Cognitive remediation of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 123–153. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-416046-0.00007-9

Hoskens, J., Klingels, K., & Smits-Engelsman, B. (2018). Validity and cross-cultural differences of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition in typically developing infants. Early Human Development, 125, 17–25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.07.002

Hua, J., Li, Y., Ye, K., Ma, Y., Lin, S., Gu, G., & Du, W. (2019). The reliability and validity of Bayley-III cognitive scale in China’s male and female children. Early Human Development, 129, 71–78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.01.017

Kiselev, S. Yu., Lvova, O. A., & Bakushkina, N. I. (2016). A comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of neurocognitive functions in children at risk of developing autism spectrum disorders. Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury (Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1: Issues in Education, Science and Culture), 147(1), 113–121. (in Russ.).

Kiselev, S. Yu., Lvova, O. A., Gliga, T., Bakushkina, N. I., Suleimanova, E. V., Grishina, K. I., … Martirosyan, S. V. (2016). The assessment of neurocognitive functions in premature infants in the first year of life using Bayley Scales. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. C. C. Korsakova (Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry), 116(4–2), 62–67. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20161163262-67 (in Russ.).

Kosyakova, O. V., & Bespalova, O. N. (2019). Prevention and therapy of threatened preterm birth in multiple pregnancies. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei (Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases), 68(4), 55–70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/JOWD68455-70 (in Russ.).

Krogh, M. T., Væver, M. S., Harder, S., & Køppe, S. (2012). Cultural differences in infant development during the first year: A study of Danish infants assessed by the Bayley-III and compared to the American norms. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(6), 730–736. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.688101

Kustova, T. V., Taranushenko, T. E., & Dem'yanova, I. M. (2018). Evaluation of psychomotor development of a child of early age: what should the pediatrician know. Meditsinskii sovet (Medical Council), 11, 104–109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21518/2079-701x-2018-11-104-109 (in Russ.).

Ranjitkar, S., Kvestad, I., Strand, T. A., Ulak, M., Shrestha, M., Chandyo, R. K., ... Hysing, M. (2018). Acceptability and reliability of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III among children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01265

Rao, U., Hammen, C. L., & Poland, R. E. (2009). Ethnic differences in electroencephalographic sleep patterns in adolescents. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 2(1), 17–24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2008.12.003

Savostyanov, A. N., Bazovkina, D. V., Saprygin, A. N., Tamozhnikov, S. S., Ausheeva, T. A., Bocharov, A. V., … Knyazev, G. G. (2018). The psychological and EEG effects of 5-HTTLPR gene polymorphism among people from different ethnic groups in Siberia. In Cognitive Sciences, Genomics and Bioinformatics (CSGB-2018): Symposium (p. 32). Novosibirsk: ICG SB RAS. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/csgb-2018-26

Shifman, B. (2016). The effect of iodine supplementation in pregnancy on early childhood neurodevelopment and clinical outcomes: results of an aborted randomised placebo-controlled trial. Aktual'naya endokrinologiya (Actual Endocrinology). Retrieved from http://actendocrinology.ru/archives/3878 (in Russ.).

Steenis, L. J. P, Verhoeven, M., Hessen, D. J., & van Baar, A. L. (2015). Performance of Dutch children on the Bayley III: A comparison study of US and Dutch norms. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0132871. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132871

Sun, L., Sabanathan, S., Thanh, P. N., Kim, A., Doa, T. T. M., Thwaites, C. L., ... Wills, B. (2019). Bayley III in Vietnamese children: Lessons for cross-cultural comparisons. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 98. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15282.1

Volodin, N. N. (Ed.). (2009). Neonatology: A national guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. (in Russ.).

Weiss, L. G., Oakland, T., & Aylward, G. P. (2010). Bayley-III clinical use and interpretation (1st ed.). Academic Press.

Yu, Y.-T., Hsieh, W.-S., Hsu, C.-H., Chen, L.-C., Lee, W.-T., Chiu, N.-C., ... Jeng, S.-F. (2013). A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 3875–3883. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.006

Yue, A., Jiang, Q., Wang, B., Abbey, C., Medina, A., Shi, Y., & Rozelle, S. (2019). Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221675. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221675

Zavadenko, A. N., Medvedev, M. I., & Degtyareva, M. G. (2018). Assessment of neurodevelopment in children of different gestational age with neonatal seizures. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. C. C. Korsakova (Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry), 118(11), 35–42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201811811135 (in Russ.).