Abstract
Since the graduate should have a number of professional competencies, as well as a high level of general culture, intelligence, creativity, and spirituality, the development of criteria and methods of the evaluation of the student’s musical-creative development
in the educational process of the university is of particular relevance. The authors assert that the use of the developing potentials of music is situational and fragmented in the domestic system of higher education. Regardless of the traditions of pre-revolutionary education in Russia, mass music education ends in adolescence. According to the authors the secondary musical personality of the future specialist is the result of the continuing mass musical education of the person. The theoretical
analysis of researches in this eld showed that various scientists noted vast possibilities of music when developing value guidelines in youth, nding the meaning of life and professional activity, for creative self-actualization, self-discovery, and spiritual communion. At the same time, the diagnostics of the musical and creative development
of personality in psycho-pedagogical science remains a challenge by virtue of the complexity and many-sided nature of these phenomena. This problem is especially urgent when evaluating the eectiveness of programs of psychological support of the creative development of the student’s personality. This paper introduces the author’s aesthetic-semiotic approach to studying this issue. To evaluate changes in student’s personality in experimental study, the authors developed criteria, characteristics, and corresponding levels of the development of the secondary musical personality.
References
Kirnarskaia D. K. Teoreticheskie osnovy i metody otsenki muzykal’noi odarennosti. Diss. dokt. ped. nauk [Theoretical foundations and methods for evaluating of musical aptitude. Dr. ped. sci. diss]. Moscow, 2006. 373 p.
Kurysheva I. V. Muzykal’no-tvorcheskoe razvitie lichnosti: estetiko-semioticheskii podkhod [Musical and creative development of the person: the aesthetic-semiotic approach]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniia – The World of Science, Culture, and Education, 2011, no. 3 (28), pp. 93–98.
Kurysheva I. V. Psikhologicheskie osnovy muzykal’no-tvorcheskogo razvitiia lichnosti v obrazovatel’nom protsesse. Diss. dokt. psikh. nauk [Psychological bases of the musical and creative development of personality in the educational process. Dr. psych. sci. diss]. N. Novgorod, 2011.
Kyshtymova I. M. Psikhosemioticheskaia metodika diagnostiki verbal’noi kreativnosti [The psycosemiotic technique for evaluating verbal creativity]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal RAN – Psychological Journal of the Russian Academy of Science, 2008, V. 29, no. 6, pp. 57–67.
Ponomarenko V. A. Psikhologiia dukhovnosti professionala [The psychology of spirituality of the professional]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2004. 162 p.
Reznichenko M. G. Formirovanie vospitatel’nogo prostranstva vuza: kriterii effektivnosti [The formation of the educational space of the institute of higher education: criteria of efficiency]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka – Pedagogical Education and Science, 2009, no. 8, pp. 32–42.
Ryzhov V. V. Lichnost’: tvorchestvo i dukhovnost’ [Personality, creativity, and spirituality]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Christian University Publ., 2012. 489 p.
Toropova A. V. Fenomen muzykal’nogo soznaniia: metodologiia issledovaniia i razvitiia. Diss. dokt. ped. nauk [The phenomenon of musical consciousness: the methodology of research and development. Dr. ped. sci. Diss]. Moscow, 2009.
Toropova A. V. Homo-musicus v zerkale muzykal’no-psikhologicheskoi i muzykal’no-pedagogicheskoi antropologii [Homo-musicus in the mirror of music-psychological and music-pedagogical anthropology]. Moscow, GRAF-PRESS Publ., 2008. 288 p.
Fadeeva S. A. Preemstvennost’ v muzykal’no-esteticheskom obrazovanii: problemy, puti resheniia [Continuity in musical-aesthetic education: problems and solutions]. Materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. seminara “Aktual’nye voprosy podgotovki spetsialista v kontekste sovremennykh preobrazovanii” [Proc. the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Seminar “Urgent problems of training of specialists in the context of modern transformations”]. Orel, 2006, pp. 208–209.
Figurovskaia V. M. Elitarnoe obrazovanie: nauchnoe soderzhanie i teoreticheskoe obosnovanie problemy [Elite education: the scientific content and theoretical grounds of the problem]. Problemy obrazovaniia – Problems of Education, Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Academy of Economics and Management Publ., 1997, pp. 9–12.
Burton J., Horowitz R., Abeles H. Leaning In and Through the Arts. N. Y., Columbia University, 2008.
Ekvall G., Britz A. Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: preliminary validation evidence for Situational Outlook Questionnaire // Creativity Research Journal, 2001, V. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–184.
Eysenck H. J. Creativity and personality: A theoretical perspective // Psychology Inquiry, 1993, V. 4, pp. 147–178.
Guilford J. P. Measurement of creativity. Exploration in creativity. N. Y., Mc-Gaw Hill, 1967.
James K., Asmus Ch. Personality, cognitive skills and creativity in different life domains // Creativity Research Journal, 2000, V. 2, pp. 149–159.
Kurysheva I. V. Fundamental psychophysiology of music therapy of neurological diseases // International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2008, 69 (3), P. 302.
Seashore C. E. Psychology of Music. N. Y., Gemünder, 1990.
Sternberg R. J. A three-faset model of Creativity // The nature of creativity. – Cambridge, 1998, pp. 53–92.
Torrance E. P. The nature of creativity as manifest in the testing // Sternberg R. The nature of creativity. Cambridge, 1988, pp. 43–75.
Vorobyeva E., Ermakov P. Training of psychology students in the scientific methods of research // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, V. 191, pp. 2699–2703.
Vorobyeva E., Talalaeva L., Pomazkova N., Sokurenko A., Samoilova N. Age dynamics of verbal creativity at pupils of multidisciplinary institution of additional education // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, V. 146, pp. 483–486.