Students background formation peculiarities within the changing educational environment
PDF (Russian)
PDF

Keywords

schema
background
introjections
sense making
intercultural communication
background knowledge
“figure and background”
cognitive construct

Abstract

The last decades are characterized by impetuous growth of different aspects of students’ learning activity research and educational paradigm shift from education to self-education. These changes are caused by the society demands, by new requirements brought in front the professionals of the future. Modern psychology faces the problem of psychological and pedagogic foundation formation for innovative teaching methods and strategies; their implementation will not only increase effectiveness of education, but self-education as well.

We consider introjection of schema and background knowledge mechanism as a basis for self-education, as a result of which a subject forms “steady functional cognitive construct ” which helps him find the way in the changing educational environment, acquire and process knowledge necessary for his professional activity.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2006.4.4
PDF (Russian)
PDF

References

Rumelhart D.E. Notes on a schema for stories// Representation and understanding/ Ed. by D.G. Bobrow. Collins, N.Y., 1975.

Bartlett, F.C. Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.

Anderson R.C. Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In Richard C. Anderson et al.(Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984.

Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность, сознание, личность, М., 1975.

Anderson, R.C. The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. R.C. Anderson and R.J. Spiro (Eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum, 1977.

Келли Дж. Психология личности (Теория личностных конструктов). СПб., 2000.

Пиаже Ж. Теория Пиаже/История зарубежной психологии 30-е - 60-е годы. М, 1986.

Wulf, F. In Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (trans. and condensed), W.D. Ellis (Ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1938.

Thorndyke, P.W. Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1977: 77-110.

Дружинин В.Н. Варианты жизни: Очерки экзистенциальной

психологии. М.: ПЕР СЭ. СПб: ИМАТОН-М, 2000.

Зинченко В.П. Живое знание. Самара, 1998.

Бахтин М. М. Эстетика словесного творчества. М., Искусство, 1979.

Лотман Ю.М. Семиотическое пространство // Лотман Ю.И. Внутри мыслящих миров: Человек. Текст. Семиосфера. История. — М., 1996.

Hirsh A. D. The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. - Boston, 1988.

Гадамер Г.-Г. Актуальность прекрасного. М.: Искусство, 1991.

Абакумова И.В. Обучение и смысл: смыслообразование в учебном процессе. (Психолого-дидактический подход). Ростов-на-Дону, изд. РГУ, 2003, 480 с.

Асмолов А.Г. Личность как предмет психологического исследования. М., 1984.

Братусь Б.С. К проблеме нравственного сознания в культуре уходящего века//Вопросы психологии. 1993.№1, с. 6 - 13.

Белоусова А.К. Самоорганизация совместной мыслительной деятельности. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во РГПУ, 2002.- 360 с.

Hammerly H. Synthesis in Second Language Teaching // Second Language Publications, 1982.

Перлз Ф. Внутри и вне помойного ведра. СПб.: XXI век, 1995. 448с.