Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the issues of constructing a person's life path is conditioned by intensive modern transformations and the need to function in conditions of uncertainty, innovation, risks, multitasking and time deficit. The focus of the present study is the identification of psychological indicators of the subjectivity of life position in youth (chronotopic, metacognitive and reflexive). Methods. The diagnostic study was conducted with the participation of girls and young men studying undergraduate programmes at the Orenburg State Pedagogical University (n = 217, age of the subjects 19-24 years old). The psychodiagnostic complex consisted of standardised methods of diagnostics of life position, temporality, psychological boundaries, metacognitive processes and self-constructs: "Personal Life Position Questionnaire (PLQ)", "Temporal Modalities of Life Existence", "Psychological Boundary Diagnostic Methodology", "Analyticity-Holistic Scale", "Self-Efficacy Scale", "Tolerance-Intolerance to Uncertainty Questionnaire", "Related Self-Concept", "Collective and Independent Self-Concept". Results. The results of the conducted research fix the connection of subjectivity of the life position with the balance of modal evaluations, rationalisation of time periods of life realization, giving and taking in functions of psychological boundaries, tolerance to uncertainty, self-efficacy, independent self-concept. Discussion. Psychological indicators of the subjectivity of the position in youth are a holistic and authentic perception of the present, a meaningful attitude to time, its perception as a resource for achieving goals and realising life tasks. The balanced information-energy exchange between the external and internal spaces of the personality, provided by the intensity and vigour of the passing functions of psychological boundaries (taking in and giving away), is significant for the formation of the subjectivity of the life position. The importance of intrasubjective self-constructs in the formation of the subject's position in adolescence is proved. The analysis of significant links between the subjectivity of the position and metacognitive processes - self-efficacy, tolerance to uncertainty - is presented. In adolescence, the identified indicators reveal the potential of personality in the independent choice of goals and strategies for their achievement, building an authentic life line on the basis of an active, responsible and conscious attitude to their own lives, constructive creative self-realisation and self-development.
References
Abdurasulov, D. A., Nazirli, M. (2020). Self-concepts and meaning-life orientations of young people. Scientific researches of XXI century, 2(4), 309–314. (in Russ.).
Abulkhanova, K. A. (2005). The principle of the subject in Russian psychology. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4, 3–21. (in Russ.).
Abulkhanova, K. A., Berezina, T. N. (2001). Time of personality and time of life. Aleteia. (in Russ.).
Antsyferova, L. I. (2000). The psychological content of the phenomenon subject and the boundaries of the subject-activity approach. Academic prospectus. (in Russ.).
Apanovich, V. V., Znakov, V. V., Alexandrov, Y. I. (2017). Validation of the analyticity-cholisticity scale on a Russian sample. Psychological Journal, 38(5), 80–96. (in Russ.).
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioural Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bredun E. V., Balanyov D. Y., Vaulina T. A., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Shcheglova E. A. (2020). Temporal features of students as cognitive diagnostic characteristics: the context of adaptive education. Russian Psychological Journal, 1, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2020.1.5 (in Russ.).
Bredun E. V., Shcheglova E. A., Smeshko E. V., Schmer T. A. (2021). Diagnostic possibilities of the questionnaire "temporal modalities of life fulfilment". Siberian Psychological Journal, 82, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/82/10 (in Russ.).
Brushlinsky, A. V. (2006). Selected psychological works. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Russ.).
Burns, R. (2003). Self-concept and self-images. Bakhrakh-M. (in Russ.).
Dorosheva, E. A., Knyazev, G. G., Kornienko, O. S. (2016). Validation of Russian-language versions of two self-concept questionnaires. Psychological Journal, 37(3), 99–112. (in Russ.).
Emelin V. A., Tkhostov A. Sh. (2015). Deformation of chronotope in the conditions of sociocultural acceleration. Voprosy philosophii, 2, 14–24. (in Russ.).
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity youth and crisis. W.W. Norton & Company INC.
Fominyh, E. S. (2022a). Psychological indicators of students' life position. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 4(92), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-4-462-471 (in Russ.).
Fominyh, E. S. (2022b). Temporal bases of life position of female students. Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, psychology, 3, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2022-3-69-73 (in Russ.).
Freud, S. (1991). Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Penguin Books.
Grishina, N. V. (2009). Man as a subject of life: situational approach. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Russ.).
Harris, T. A. (2019). I'm O'K, you're O'K. Academic project. (in Russ.).
Hartmann, H. (1971). Ego-psychology and the problem of adaptation. International University Press.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Jerusalem, M. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal pro-cesses. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Schwarzer, R. (ed.). Hemisphere.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders Reprint Edition. University of Chicago Press.
Kornilova, T. V., Chumakova, M. A. (2014). Scales of tolerance and intolerance to uncertainty in modification of S. Badner's questionnaire. Experimental Psychology, 7(1), 92–110. (in Russ.).
Leontiev, D. A. (2003). Psychology of meaning: the nature, structure and dynamics of meaning reality. Meaning. (in Russ.).
Leontiev, D. A., Shilmanskaya, A. E. (2019). Life position of personality: from theory to operationalisation. Voprosy Psychologii, 1, 90–100. (in Russ.).
Levy, T. S. (2013a). A methodology for diagnosing the psychological boundary of personality. Issues in Psychology, 1, 131–146. (in Russ.).
Levy, T. S. (2013b). Diagnosing the psychological boundary of personality: a qualitative analysis. Issues in Psychology, 5, 93–101. (in Russ.).
Loshchakova, A. B. (2015). On the content and correlation of the concepts "Personal effectiveness" and "Self-efficacy" in psychological science. Vestnik of A.S. Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2, 54–63. (in Russ.).
Markin, V. N. (2005). Life position of personality as a psychological and acmeological category and the phenomenon of social self-assertion. The World of Psychology, 4, 45–50. (in Russ.).
Markus, H. R., Kitayama S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psihologikal Review, 52, 224–253.
Maslow, A. H. Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row.
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 234–250.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.
Podolsky, A. I., Idobaeva, O. A. (2019). Quo vadis? Trajectories of value-motivational development of modern Russian youth. Voprosy psychologii, 2, 45–58. (in Russ.).
Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapists View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Schwarzer, R., Yerusalem, M., Romek, V. (1996). The Russian version of R. Schwarzer and M. Yerusalem's self-efficacy scale. Foreign Psychology, 7, 71–76. (in Russ.).
Shapoval, I. A., Fominyh, E. S. (2018). Self-relationship as a phenomenological field of diagnostics of psychological boundaries of personality and its health. Clinical and special psychology, 7(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2018070102 (in Russ.).
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261.
Znakov, V. V. (2013). Analyticity and holism in the views of A. V. Brushlinsky and O. K. Tikhomirov. Voprosy psychologii, 4, 135–146. (in Russ.).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ekaterina S. Fominyh