Associations Between Visions of the Future and Educational Outcomes of Young Adults

Versions

PDF
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

youth
modern youth
generation Z
academic success
self-determination
Unified State Examination
USE result
life trajectory
life planning
future

Abstract

Introduction. This study aims to examine the association between young adults’ visions of their own future and their Unified State Examination (USE) scores. The present study is the first to detail this vision and define the meaning-based content of young adults’ visions of the future and self-assessments of their existing achievements in comparison with the expected ones. Methods. The study was conducted in two stages with a 2.5-year interval. In the first stage, the Me in 5 Years inventory was used on a sample of 1538 male and female young adults aged 14–28 years. In the second stage, 150 subjects of those who participated in the first stage of experiment answered questions about their USE results, about their own achievements, which they assumed in descriptions at the first stage, and about the reasons for poor performance. Results. To reach high levels of academic performance, modern young adults need to have a vision of their lives, in the context of their knowledge and what they can do on their own. There is a significant correlation between young adults’ self-assessments of their own achievements and the USE scores. Young adults with low elective USE scores indicate that they achieved their plans earlier than planned. Young adults’ confidence that everything they planned for the near future may really happen but later than expected is associated with average USE scores in compulsory subjects. Discussion. The USE represents a kind of systematization of plans for young adults with average USE scores in compulsory subjects. Those who are less successful in passing the USE in elective subjects have no clear life goals and cannot objectively assess their achievability.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.1.6
PDF
PDF (Russian)

References

Adelman, R. M., Herrmann, S. D., Bodford, J. E., Barbour, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2017). Feeling closer to the future self and doing better: Temporal psychological mechanisms underlying academic performance. Journal of Personality, 85(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12248

Arnett, J. J. (2016). Life stage concepts across history and cultures: Proposal for a new field on indigenous life stages. Human Development, 59(5), 290–316. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453627

Belogai, K. N., & Bugrova, N. A. (2018). Forming the image of the future in the period of youth as a problem of professional education. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv (Bulletin of Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts), 43, 205–216. (in Russ.).

Bogacheva, N. V., & Sivak, E. V. (2019). Myths about Generation Z. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. (in Russ.).

Chesnokova, O. B., Churbanova, S. M., & Molchanov, S. V. (2019). Professional self-determination in young age as a structural component of future professionalism: Socio-cognitive and creative factors. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 15(4), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150411 (in Russ.).

Dudik, G. S. (2016). Interrelation of personal qualities of students and the Unified State Examination results with the results of successful graduation from the university. In Proceedings of the 54th International Scientific Student Conference ISSC-2016: Psychology (pp. 60–61). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. (in Russ.).

Egorenko, T. A. (2018). The role of social intelligence in the process of professional development of personality at the stage of higher education. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya (Modern Foreign Psychology), 7(3), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070310 (in Russ.).

Habermas, T., & Reese, E. (2015). Getting a life takes time: The development of the life story in adolescence, its precursors and consequences. Human Development, 58(3), 172–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437245

Kashpur, V. V., Gubanov, A. V., Feshchenko, A. V., Izofatova, M. S., & Kobenko, A. V. (2020). Correlation between academic achievements of high school students and their digital shadow in social network. Pedagogika i prosveshchenie (Pedagogy and Education), 4, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2020.4.33952 (in Russ.).

Kauffman, D. F., & Husman, J. (2004). Effects of time perspective on student motivation: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012342.37854.58

Klement'eva, M. V. (2019). The biographical concept as a psychological means of life reflection. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 15(4), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150407 (in Russ.).

Kon, I. S. (1984). In search of oneself: Personality and its self-consciousness. Moscow: Politizdat. (in Russ.).

Kravtsov, G. G., & Kravtsova, E. E. (2020). Cultural-historical approach to education. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 16(4), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160401 (in Russ.).

Kulakova, A. B. (2018). Generation Z: Theoretical aspect. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya (Territorial Development Issues), 2. https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6 (in Russ.).

Lewin, K. (2000). Field theory in social sciences (Trans.). St. Petersburg: Sensor. (in Russ.).

Lukina, N. L., & Solov'eva, E. A. (2019). Time perspective of students in secondary vocational and higher educational institutions. Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh (Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Studies), 3, 170–176. (in Russ.).

Molotkov, Yu. I., & Ryabchun, I. P. (2019). Study of the career guidance for young people and the possibility of harmonization of the personal life cycle. Filosofiya obrazovaniya (Philosophy of Education), 19(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20190305 (in Russ.).

Neyaskina, Yu. Yu., & Pron'kina, V. O. (2017). Future planning peculiarities under different conditions of uncertainty tolerance in young adults. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Kemerovo State University Bulletin), 3, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-143-152 (in Russ.).

Pavlenko, V. N. (2020). The concepts of ‘tool’, ‘psychological tool’, ‘sign’ and their relationship. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-Historical Psychology), 16(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160112 (in Russ.).

Petrova, V. N. (2019). Image of the future as a predictor of professional development (Doctoral dissertation). National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk. (in Russ.).

Pichayayothin, N. B. (2014). Investigating balanced time perspective in adults across the life span. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports, 6418. Retrieved from https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6418

Pinto, J. C., Faria, L., & do Céu Taveira, M. (2014). Social intelligence in Portuguese students: Differences according to the school grade. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.168

Polivanova, K. N. (2012). Maturation in modern world. Obrazovatel'naya politika (Educational Policy), 3, 76–82. (in Russ.).

Polivanova, K. N., & Smirnov, I. B. (2017). What’s in my profile: VKontakte data as a tool for studying the interests of modern teenagers. Voprosy obrazovaniya (Educational Studies), 2, 134–152. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-2-134-152 (in Russ.).

Radaev, V. V. (2020a). The divide among the Millennial Generation: Historical and empirical justifications. (Part I). Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal (Sociological Journal), 26(3), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.3.7395 (in Russ.).

Radaev, V. V. (2020b). The divide among the Millennial Generation: Historical and empirical justifications. (Part II). Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal (Sociological Journal), 26(4), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.4.7641 (in Russ.).

Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Torres, C., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Butenko, T. (2017). Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2228

Shaporov, A. M. (2020). Factors of students’ academic success sustainability. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik (Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin), 4, 25–32. (in Russ.).

Vorontsova, Yu., & Ermolaev, V. V. (2016). Representations of the Generation Z about their future family (on the example of Lithuanian high school students). Psikholog (Psychologist), 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8701.2016.1.16664 (in Russ.).

Vygotskii, L. S. (1983). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In Collected Works: in 6 volumes (Vol. 3. Problems in the development of psyche). Moscow: Pedagogika. (in Russ.).

Yanitskii, M. S., Seryi, A. V., Braun, O. A., Pelekh, Yu. V., Maslova, O. V., Sokol'skaya, M. V., … Kapustina, T. V. (2019). The value orientations system of Generation Z: Social, cultural, and demographic determinants. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Siberian Journal of Psychology), 72, 46–67. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/72/3 (in Russ.).

Yaremchuk, S. V., Bakina, A. V., & Sityaeva, S. M. (2021). Characteristics of lifeworlds in male and female youths at different age periods. Russian Psychological Journal, 18(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.1.3 (in Russ.).

Yaroshevskaya, S. V., & Sysoeva, T. A. (2021). Students’ conceptions of academic success: Topics, guiding lines, and contradictions. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 26(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260106 (in Russ.).

Zhilinskaya, A. V., & Bochaver, A. A. (2018). Approaches to studying the building of young adults trajectories of the life way. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 39(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.7868/S020595921801004X (in Russ.).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Shilova N. P.