Time Attitudes in Contemporary Men and Women
Introduction. This paper investigates predictors of time attitudes in men and women aged 25–45 years. A theoretical analysis concentrates on the concept of time in the context of classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical ideals of rationality. In the process of individuals’ interaction with objects, time is born as a qualitatively new reality that is reducible neither to the subjective nor to the objective perspective. The psychological category of time is interpreted within the framework of post-non-classical approach that is capable of solving that contradiction.
Methods. The survey method was employed in the study for data collection. Mathematical and statistical analyses included Student’s t-test for independent samples and step-wise regression analysis.
Results. The transspective analysis of the problem of time in psychology enabled authors to describe its dynamics at classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical stages. The study examined time attitudes in men and women and determined their predictors in the context of gender differences.
Discussion. This is the first study that examines the predictors of time attitudes in men and women. Its original findings suggest that there is a dependency between time attitudes and parameters of personal and subjective functioning, including self-actualization, psychological well-being, coping strategies, and psychological defenses. Not so much certain values, as the subsystems of values belonging to various aspects of life (family, hobby, profession, household, etc.) participate in the formation process of time attitudes in men and women. Personal values determine the specific character of regulation of the time of life in women and men. Coping strategies are important for personal organization of time. The study showed the differences in interrelationships between value choices and time attitudes in men and women.
Abul'khanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Time of personality and life time]. St. Petersburg, Aletheia Publ., 2001. 304 p.
Zimbardo P., Boyd J. The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life, New York, NY, Free Press, 2008 (Russ. ed.: Zimbardo F., Boid Dzh. Paradoks vremeni. Novaya psikhologiya vremeni, kotoraya uluchshit vashu zhizn'. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2010. 352 p.).
Ralnikova I. A. Perestroika sistemy zhiznennykh perspektiv cheloveka na etape perelomnykh sobytii [Restructuring of the system of individuals’ life prospects at the stage of critical events]. Barnaul, ASU Publ., 2012. 194 p.
Zarubin P. V., Syrtsova A. Time perspective and economic instability: A comparative study (2007-2013). Psychological Studies. 2013, V. 6, no. 32, pp. 9 (in Russian). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2013v6n32/911-zarubin32.html (Accessed 15 November 2018).
McGrath J., Tschan F. Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington DC: APA, 2004. 227 p.
Fieulaine N. Perspective temporelle, situations de précarité et santé: Une approche psychosociale du temps. Sciences de l’Homme et Société. Université de Provence – Aix-Marseille I, 2006. 385 p. URL: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/408117/filename/These_N_Fieulaine.pdf (Accessed 02 December 2018).
Ralnikova I., Smirnova Y. Life prospects of the unemployed: invariant and variable components in the prism of the last decade (2009–2018). SHS Web of Conferences, 2018, V. 55. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185502028
Muzdybayev K. Perezhivanie vremeni v period krizisov [Experience of time in the period of crisis]. Psikholologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2000, V. 21, no. 4, pp. 20–21.
Kozlovskaya T. N. Samoorganizatsiya vremeni kak faktor formirovaniya “obraza budushchego” studenta universiteta [Self-organization of time as a factor in the formation of university students' “image of the future”]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Orenburg, 2005. 176 p.
Syrtsova A. Vozrastnaya dinamika vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti [Age-related dynamics of an individual's time perspective]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.). Moscow, 2008. 317 p.
Rohr M. K., John D. T., Fung H. H., & Lang F. R. A three-component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 2017, V. 32 (7), pp. 597–607. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000191
Grant S. J. Perspectives in time: How consumers think about the future. Advances in Consumer Research, 2003, V. 30, no. 1, pp. 143–145.
Venaik S., Zhu Y., Brewer P. Looking into the future: Hofstede long term orientation versus GLOBE future orientation. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 2013, V. 20, Issue 3, pp. 361–385. DOI: 10.1108/CCM-02-2012-0014
Ralnikova I., Smirnova Y. Youth personal identity as a factor in the formation of a time perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 2018, V. 55. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185502029
Nestik T. A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya vremeni [Social psychology of time]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, RAS Publ., 2014. 496 p.
Tolstykh N. N. Razvitie vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti: kul'turno-istoricheskii podkhod [Development of an individual’s time perspective: A cultural-historical approach]. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psych.). Moscow, 2010. 545 p.
Milfont T. L., Gouveia V. V. Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2006, V. 26, Issue 1, pp. 72–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
Zimbardo P. G., Sword R., Sword R. The time cure, 2012 (Russ. ed.: Zimbardo F., Svord R., Svord R. Vremya kak lekarstvo. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2017. 288 p.).
Ippolitova E., Ralnikova I., Gurova O. Family prospects of the Russian youth in conditions of social change. SHS Web of Conferences, 2018, V. 55. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185502002
Klochko V. E. Samoorganizatsiya v psikhologicheskikh sistemakh: problemy stanovleniya mental'nogo prostranstva lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyi analiz) [Self-organization in psychological systems: Issues of the formation of personal mental space (introduction to the transpective analysis). Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2005. 174 p.
Klochko V. E., Galazhinskii E. V. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya [Psychology of innovative behavior]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2009. 240 p.
Syrtsova A., Sokolova E. T., Mitina O. V. Modification of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2008, V. 29, no. 3, pp. 101–109 (in Russian).
Sopov V. F., Karpushina L. V. Morphological test of life values. Prikladnaya psikhologiya – Applied Psychology, 2001, no. 4, pp. 9–30 (in Russian).
Vasserman L. I., Eryshev O. F., Klubova E. B. et al. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika indeksa zhiznennogo stilya [Psychological diagnostics of the life style index]. St. Petersburg, V. M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, 2005. 54 p. Available at: http://bekhterev.ru/content/42/2005_dilifestyle.pdf (Accessed 02 December 2018).
Kryukova T. L., Kuftyak E. V. Ways of coping questionnaire (WCQ technique modification). Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa – Journal of the Practical Psychologist, 2007, no. 3, pp. 93–112 (in Russian).
Lepeshinskii N. N. Modification of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2007, no. 3, pp. 24–37 (in Russian). Available at: http://media.miu.by/files/store/items/pj/15/pj_15_2007_3.pdf (Accessed 02 December 2018).
Gozman L. Ya., Kroz M. V., Latinskaya M. V. Samoaktualizatsionnyi test [Self-actualization test]. Moscow, Rossiiskoe pedagogicheskoe agentstvo Publ., 1995. 43 p.
Borozdina L. V., Spiridonova I. A. Age-related changes in a subject’s time perspective: Part I: Formal parameters. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1998, V. 19, no. 2, pp. 40–50 (in Russian).
Anan'ev B. G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as an object of cognition]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. 288 p.
Rubinshtein S. L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Being and consciousness. Man and the world]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2003. 512 p.
Kovalev V. I. Features of subjective life time regulation. In: Vremya deyatel'nosti lichnosti [Individuals’ time of activity]. Chernivtsy, ChSU Publ., 1991, pp. 67–75.
Golovakha E. I., Kronik A. A. Psikhologicheskoe vremya lichnosti [Individuals’ psychological time]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2008. 267 p.
Gusel'tseva M. S. Psychology and history: Changing the types of rationality. Voprosy psikhologii, 2011, no. 2, pp. 13–24 (in Russian).
Znakov V. V. Psychology of human existence as a direction of the development of a subject’s psychology. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2008, V. 29, no. 2, pp. 69–77 (in Russian).
Leont'ev D. A. Non-classical vector in modern psychology. Postneklassicheskaya psikhologiya. Sotsial’nyi konstruktsionizm i narrativnyi podkhod – Postmodern psychology. Social constructivism and narrative approach, 2005, no. 1 (2), pp. 51–71 (in Russian).
Cottle T. J. Perceiving time: A psychological investigation with men and women. N. Y., John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1976. 284 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.