Perspectives in Studying Self-Consciousness in Special Education
PDF (Russian)
PDF

Keywords

self-representation
embodied self
reflection
de-reflection
consolidation
delimitation
identification
de-identification
self-acceptance
self-rejection

Abstract

Introduction. Studying self-consciousness in individuals with disabilities is associated with certain diagnostic, interpretation, and organization difficulties. Elaboration of a unified methodological basis to investigate personality traits in individuals with developmental abnormalities represents a scientific challenge.
Theoretical Basis. When studying mental states and cognitive or other impairments, methodology for exploring individual inner world and self-representations should rely upon explanatory, phenomenological, and interactive research viewpoints.
Results and Discussion. This paper introduces the ‘embodied self’ concept, that partially unifies three basic methodological approaches and contains some elements of self-models and a narrative component integrating biopsychic, emotional, and cognitive-behavioral factors. This offers the components important to researchers in the field of self-consciousness in special education, including biogenetic component, self-model, implicit ‘sense of self’, cognitive component of the ‘explicit self-concept’, behavioral component of self-representations, and narrative component of self-representations. A system approach to the study of self-consciousness in individuals with disabilities is related to intrinsic mechanisms of the development of self-consciousness, specific characteristics of individuals’ activities towards themselves and their behavior, self-orientation as the behavioral result of self-consciousness. Special educationalists may be interested in such mechanisms of self-consciousness in individuals with developmental abnormalities as self-acceptance/self-rejection, identification/de-identification, reflection/de-reflection, and consolidation/delimitation.
Conclusion. The approaches to studying self-consciousness in individuals with disabilities require the techniques relevant to aims of special educationalists’ work with individuals of various ages with various dysontogenetic abnormalities. The development of new methods and techniques of psychological interventions influencing adaptation-related components of self-consciousness may help create the differentiated environment for person-oriented interaction in the context of psychological support of individuals of different ages with developmental disorders.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2020.2.1
PDF (Russian)
PDF

References

Chesnokova, I. I. (1977). The problem of identity in psychology. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.).

Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin Books.

Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The primary triangle: A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers, and infants. Basic Books.

Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Philipp, D. A. (2014). The baby and the couple. Understanding and treating young families. Routledge.

Galbusera, L., & Fellin, L. (2014). The intersubjective endeavor of psychopathology research: Methodological reflections on a second-person perspective approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01150

Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7), 83–108.

Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535–543. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003

Gallagher, S. (2008b). Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 163–174. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239227

Gallagher, S. (2012). In defense of phenomenological approaches to social cognition: Interacting with the critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 187–212. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0080-1

Gallagher, S. (2013). A pattern theory of self. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443

Gallagher, S., & Daly, A. (2018). Dynamical relations in the self-pattern. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 664. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00664

Kuzmina, T. I. (2016). Psychological diagnostics of self-consciousness of persons of different ages with intellectual disorders. Moscow: Natsional'nyi knizhnyi tsentr. (in Russ.).

Längle, A. (1990). Existential analysis psychotherapy. The International Forum of Logotherapy. Journal of Search for Meaning, 13(2), 17–19.

Längle, A. (1992/1999). Die existentielle motivation der person. Existenzanalyse, 16(3), 18–29.

Lebedinskaya, K. S., & Lebedinskii, V. V. (2018). Psychic development disorders in children and adolescents. Textbook. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russ.).

Levchenko, I. Yu., Prikhod'ko, O. G., & Guseinova, A. A. (2017). Special access terms to high professional education in children with disabilities. Special Needs Education: Theory & Practice, 3, 15–37. (in Russ.).

Lubovskii, V. I. (2017). Inclusion – A developmental dead end for the education of disabled children. Sovremennoye doshkolnoye obrazovaniye. Teoriya i praktika (Preschool Education Today. Theory and Practice), 2, 32–37. (in Russ.).

Lubovskii, V. I. (2018). What is the ‘Structure of Defect’? Special Education, 4, 145–157. (in Russ.).

Metzinger, T. (2009). The Ego-Tunnel. The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basis Books.

Metzinger, T. (2011). The no-self alternative. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 279–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Metzinger, T. (2014). First-order embodiment, second-order embodiment, third-order embodiment. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 272–286). London: Routledge.

Newen, A. (2015). Understanding others – The Person Model Theory. In T. Metzinger, J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND (pp. 1–28). Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15502/9783958570320

Newen, A. (2018a). The embodied self, the pattern theory of self, and the predictive mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2270. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02270

Newen, A. (2018b). The person model theory and the question of situatedness of social understanding. In F. Newen, L. De Bruin, S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 469–492). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.25

Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2003). Self-representation: Searching for a neural signature of self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 529–543. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00080-1

Pantileev, S. R. (1993). Technique of study the Self. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russ.).

Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (1995). Research in psychopathology: Epistemologic issues. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 36(3), 167–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(95)90078-A

Parnas, J., & Gallagher, S. (2014). Phenomenology and the interpretation of psychopathological experience. In L. J. Kirmayer, R. Lemelson, C. A. Cummings (Eds.), Re-visioning psychiatry: Cultural phenomenology, critical neuroscience, and global mental health (pp. 65–80). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139424745.006

Parnas, J., Sass, L. A., & Zahavi, D. (2013). Rediscovering psychopathology: The epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(2), 270–277. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs153

Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10vm0qv

Reddy, V., & Morris, P. (2004). Participants don’t need theories: Knowing minds in engagement. Theory & Psychology, 14(5), 647–665. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354304046177

Schechtman, M. (2007). Stories, lives, and basic survival: A refinement and defense of the narrative view. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 155–178. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1358246107000082

Stanghellini, G. (2007). The grammar of the psychiatric interview. Psychopathology, 40, 69–74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000098486

Stanghellini, G. (2010). A hermeneutic framework for psychopathology. Psychopathology, 43, 319–326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000319401

Stolin, V. V. (1983). Personality self-consciousness. Monograph. Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow University. (in Russ.).

Thompson, E. (2007). .Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the science of mind Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Troshin, G. Ya. (1915). Antropological foundations of education. Comparative psychology of normal and abnormal children. G. Ya. Troshin’s School and Hospital. (in Russ.).

Vygotskii, L. S. (1983). Collected works in 6 vols.: Vol. 5. The fundamentals of defectology. Moscow: Pedagogika. (in Russ.).

Wiggins, O. P., & Schwartz, M. A. (2013). Phenomenology and psychopathology: In search for a method. In G. Stanghellini, T. Fuchs (Eds.), One century of Karl Jaspers' general psychopathology (pp. 16–26). Oxford University Press.