Abstract
Introduction. This study investigates the main reasons for difficulties in students’ mental self-regulation and represents a first attempt to systematize previous research findings from the field in the context of the metacognitive approach.
Methods. The study used the following techniques of psychological testing: (a) the Style of Self-regulation of Behavior questionnaire by Morosanova, (b) the Self-organization of Activities questionnaire by Mandrikova, (c) the Emotional Intelligence Self-evaluation technique by N. Hall, (d) the Gissen Complaints Questionnaire, and (e) the Difficulties in Self-regulation questionnaire by Lovyagina. A sample of 113 second-year students of St. Petersburg State University with a mean age of 19.5 years took part in this study.
Results. The findings of this study indicate that several groups of students can be distinguished based on the levels of self-organization of activities and the styles of self-regulation of behavior. The authors identified and described the difficulties in students’ mental self-regulation in (a) attention and will, (b) self-restraint, (c) thinking, and (d) anxiety and memory. The styles of self-regulation of behavior and self-organization of activities and the ability to manage the emotional sphere are important factors that can help to overcome difficulties in mental self-regulation.
Discussion. The metacognitive approach to the analysis of difficulties in self-regulation is capable of solving theoretical and practical problems related to improvement in mental self-regulation skills. Students’ assessment of their own cognitive abilities and their awareness of difficulties in mental self-regulation enable their metacognition and contribute to the development of skills of mental self-regulation. Metacognitive knowledge facilitates adequate self-assessment skills and the choice of the most effective strategies of behavior and self-organization of activities.
References
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, & understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and self-regulation. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 31–51). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dikaya, L. G. (2003). Mental self-regulation of human functional status: A system-activity approach. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Psychology. (in Russ.).
Faizullaev, A. A. (1987). Motivational self-regulation. Tashkent: Fan. (in Russ.).
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and соgnitive monitoring: A new area of соgnitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 141–149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation, and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311–1327. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
Ivannikov, V. A. (2006). Psychological mechanisms of volitional regulation. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russ.).
Karpov, A. A. (2012). Interrelations between learnability and metacognitive personal traits. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik (Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin), 2(3), 228–235. (in Russ.).
Karpov, A. V. (2004). Reflection in the structure of a subject’s metacognitive organization. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie (Reflexive Processes and Control), 4(1), 99–109. (in Russ.).
Karpov, A. A., & Karpov, A. V. (2016). Interrelations between psychometric intelligence and the organization of personality traits and metacognitive processes. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 37(2), 69–78. (in Russ.).
Karpov, A. V., & Skityaeva, I. M. (2005). Psychology of personal metacognitive processes. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Psychology. (in Russ.).
Konopkin, O. A. (1995). Mental self-regulation of voluntary activity: A structural-functional perspective. Voprosy psikhologii, 1, 5–13. (in Russ.).
Kostin, A. N., & Golikov, Yu. Ya. (2014). The organizational and procedural approach to the analysis of the mental regulation of complex activity. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Psychology. (in Russ.).
Kuhl, J. (1994a). A theory of action and state orientations. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 9–46). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J. (1994b). Action and state orientation: Psychometric properties of the action control scales (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47–59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1994). Self-discrimination and memory: State orientation and false self-ascription of assigned activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1103–1115. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1103
Leont'ev, D. A. (2016). Self-regulation, resources, and personal potential. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Siberian Psychological Journal), 62, 18–37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/17267080/62/3 (in Russ.).
Mandrikova, E. Yu. (2010). Development of the self-organization questionnaire (SOQ). Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika (Psychological Diagnostics), 2, 59–83. (in Russ.).
Martinez, S., & Davalos, D. (2016). Investigating metacognition, cognition and behavioral deficits of college students with acute traumatic brain injuries. Journal of American College Health, 64(5), 390–396. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2016.1167057
Morosanova, V. I. (2001). The individual style of self-regulation: The phenomenon, structure, and function in human voluntary activity. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.).
Morosanova, V. I. (2012). Psychology of self-regulation. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (in Russ.).
Nikiforov, G. S. (1985). Theoretical issues of self-control. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 6(5), 19–31. (in Russ.).
Osnitskii, A. K. (2009). Regulatory experience, subjective activity, and human independence: Part 2. Psychological Studies, 6(8). Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru (in Russ.).
Pervichko, E. I. (2014). Strategies for the regulation of emotions: J. Gross procedural model and cultural activity approach. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal (National Psychological Journal), 4(16), 13–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11621/npj.2014.0402 (in Russ.).
Prokhorov, A. O. (2005). Functional structures and means for self-regulation of mental states. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 26(2), 68–80. (in Russ.).
Prokhorov, A. O. (2017). Self-regulation of mental states in daily, ordinary activity of the person. Psychological Studies, 10(56), p. 7. Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru (in Russ.).
Rusalov, V. M. (2012). Temperament in the structure of human individuality: Differential psychophysiological and psychological studies. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Psychology. (in Russ.).
Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215–244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.869763
Tregubov, I. B., & Babin, S. M. (1992). Giessen Subjective Complaints List. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.).
Zmanovskaya, E. V. (2008).Theoretical and methodological foundations for the general theory of deviance and deviant behavior. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noi raboty (Scientific Notes Journal of St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work), 9(1), 133–138. (in Russ.).