Abstract
Introduction. Along with the socio-psychological characteristics of team interaction and management issues, innermost meaning aspects of team interaction merit special attention. The successful realization of meaning processes and phenomena determines the development of team interaction in teams. At present, little is known about meaning aspects of team interaction. This study investigates the conditions of meaning processes in teams and factors contributing to and hindering them.
Theoretical Basis. The theory of self-organization of joint mental activity (A. K. Belousova) as a framework for revealing meaning dynamics in team interaction and also fundamental propositions of the psychology of meaning developed by Russian researchers (D. A. Leontiev, I. V. Abakumova, etc.) provided methodological foundations for the present study.
Results and Discussion. The authors considered the process of meaning transmission which generates common new formations in teams including psychological situations, meanings, motives, goals, and assessments. In turn, these new formations contribute to the development of the common meaning field or meaning fund in teams. Meaning communication among team members is extremely important. Team members’ common conscious understanding of what they do and how they do promotes both harmonious interpersonal relationships and effective communication which is important for successful work. Meaning dialogue is a technology that provides meaning communication and changes in team members’ value-meaning sphere. Meaning resonance contributes to meaning communication among team members; meaning dissonance impedes it. The meaning aspect of team cohesion is a complex phenomenon that affects many team processes. The results of the study can be used in a further study of meaning aspects of team interaction in the practice of team formation. The findings are of interest to the specialists engaged in studying teams and psychology practitioners working with teams.
References
O’Neill T. A., Salas E. Creating high performance teamwork in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 2018, V. 28, Issue 4, pp. 325–331. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.09.001
Hagemann V., Kluge A. Complex problem solving in teams: The impact of collective orientation on team process demands. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, V. 8, Article 1730. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01730
Chanko A. D. Team building in modern organizations: An interdisciplinary synthesis of psychology and management. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 8. Menedzhment – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University: Series 8: Management, 2007, no. 2, pp. 157–177 (in Russian).
Dzhakupov S. M. Tseleobrazovanie v sovmestnoi myslitel'noi deyatel'nosti [Goal formation in joint mental activity]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.), 1985.
Leont'ev D. A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real'nosti [Psychology of meaning: Nature, structure, and dynamics of meaning reality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 511 p.
Belousova A. K. Samoorganizatsiya sovmestnoi myslitel'noi deyatel'nosti [Self-organization of joint mental activity]. Rostov-on-Don, RSPU Publ., 2002. 360 p.
Abakumova I. V., Kagermazova L. Ts., Ermakov P. N. Tekhnologii napravlennoi translyatsii smyslov v praktike uchebnogo protsessa [Technologies of the directed translation of meanings in the educational process]. Moscow, Kredo Publ., 2016. 234 p.
Kagermazova L. Ts. Smyslovye kommunikatsii v uchebnom protsesse: teoriya i tekhnologii napravlennoi translyatsii smyslov v obuchenii [Meaning communications in the educational process: Theory and technologies of the directed translation of meanings in training]. Rostov-on-Don, 2009. 66 p.
Belousova A. K. Smysloperedacha v sovmestnoi myslitel'noi deyatel'nosti [Meaning transmission in joint mental activity]. Kategoriya smysla v filosofii, psikhologii, psikhoterapii i v obshchestvennoi zhizni: Materialy Vserossiiskoi psikhologicheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [The category of meaning in philosophy, psychology, psychotherapy, and in public life: Proc. the all-Russian psychological conference with the international participation]. Rostov-on-Don, Kredo Publ., 23–26 April, 2014, pp. 225–226.
Dautov D. F., Belousova A. K. Mutual interaction of partners in joint mental activity in training. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki – Proceedings of the Southern Federal University: Pedagogical Science, 2009, no. 9, pp. 117–127 (in Russian).
Belousova A. K. Meaning transmission and its role in the formation of a combined psychological system. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Siberian Psychological Journal, 2004, no. 20, pp. 22–28 (in Russian).
Dzhakupov S. M. Development of the meaning theory of thinking in the concept of co-dialogical cognitive activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya – Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2008, no. 2, pp. 180–188 (in Russian).
Aubé C., Rousseau V., Brunelle E. et al. The relevance of being “on the same page” to succeed as a project team: A moderated mediation model. Motivation and Emotion, 2018, V. 42, Issue 6, pp. 804–815. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9706-2
Aubé C., Rousseau V., Tremblay S. Perceived shared understanding in teams: The motivational effect of being ‘on the same page’. British Journal of Psychology, 2015, V. 106, Issue 3, pp. 468–486. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12099
Cash P., Dekoninck E. A., & Ahmed-Kristensen S. Supporting the development of shared understanding in distributed design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, V. 28, Issue 3, pp. 147–170. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1274719
Paul S., He F., Dennis A. R. Group atmosphere, shared understanding, and team conflict in short duration virtual teams. Proceedings of the 51stHawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu, 2018, pp. 361–370. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10125/49935
Dautov D. F., Suroedova E. A. Fenomeny sovmestnoi myslitel'noi deyatel'nosti [Phenomena of joint mental activity]. Rostov-on-Don, DSTU Publ., 2012. 168 p.
Frizen M. A. Osobennosti razvitiya smyslovoi sfery podrostkov [Characteristics of the development of adolescents’ meaning sphere]. Khabarovsk, 2005.
Dotsenko E. L. Mezhlichnostnoe obshchenie: semantika i mekhanizmy [Interpersonal communication: Semantics and mechanisms]. Tyumen, Togirro Publ., 1998. 202 p.
Abakumova I. V., Godunov M. V. Meaning dissonance and alternative assessment of personality traits. Natsional'noe zdorov'e – National Health, 2017, no. 1–2, pp. 137–150 (in Russian).
Hedman-Phillips E., Kevin Barge J. Facilitating team reflexivity about communication. Small Group Research, 2017, V. 48, Issue 3, pp. 255–287. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496416684962
Marlow Sh. L., Lacerenza C. N., Paoletti J., et al. Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2018, V. 144, pp. 145–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001
Sidorenkov A. V. (ed.) Psikhologiya maloi gruppy: retrospektivnyi nauchno-vspomogatel'nyi ukazatel' otechestvennykh trudov [The psychology of small groups: A retrospective research-accessory index of domestic works.]. Moscow, Credo Publ., 2014. 268 p.
Sidorenkov A. V., Mondrus A. L. Empirical foundation for the model of group cohesion. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2012, V. 33, no. 2, pp. 45–58 (in Russian).
Sysoeva A. I. Emotional determinants of cohesion in small groups. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya – Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2014, no. 20, pp. 204–207 (in Russian).
Nemov R. S., Shestakov A. G. Cohesion as a factor of group efficiency. Voprosy psikhologii, 1981, no. 3, pp. 113–119 (in Russian).
Dontsov A. I. Problemy gruppovoi splochennosti [Problems of group cohesion]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1979. 126 p.
Carson J. B., Tesluk P. E., Marrone J. A. Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, V. 50, no. 5, pp. 1217–1234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921
Huang C.-H. Shared leadership and team learning: Roles of knowledge sharing and team characteristics. The Journal of International Management Studies, 2013, V. 8, no. 1, pp. 124–133.