Interrelation Between Personal Ego-Competence and the Ability to Understand Another Person in Adolescence
PDF Russian (Russian)
HTML (Russian)

Keywords

adolescence
communication
subject of cognition
interpersonal understanding
accuracy of understanding
personal ego-competence
personal communicative potential
understanding of nonverbal behavior
understanding the development of a situation

Abstract

Introduction. The paper presents the results of the study of interrelation between personal ego-competence (synonymous to self-competence) and the ability to understand another person in adolescence. The novelty of the research lies in its complex approach to studying the association of personal ego-competence with the following parameters of communicative abilities: personal communicative potential of the subject of cognition, understanding of another person’s state by his/her nonverbal behavior, accuracy of predicting the development of an interpersonal communication situation, and self-rating of the ability to understand others. The paper investigates the levels of communicative development of young boys and girls with high and low indices of personal ego-competence, where the study participants are considered to be the subjects of interpersonal cognition.

Methods. The study used the following diagnostic tools developed by V. N. Kunitsyna: (a) the Parables test; (b) the Communicative and Social Competence survey (COSCOM); (c) the technique for revealing Stability, Tolerance, and Altruism in interpersonal relations and other personality traits (STAL); (d) the survey for identifying Self-regulation and Success of Interpersonal Communication (SSIC); (e) and the Self-Appraisal test. The study also employed the Expression test, a modified version of the Expression Grouping subtest in Six Factor Test of Social Intelligence by J. Guilford and M. Sullivan, and the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Students from Magnitogorsk State Technical University (n = 125) formed the study sample.

Results. The results indicate that the parameters of personal ego-competence in adolescence have positive associations with the personal communicative potential and self-rating of the ability to understand others. No statistically significant associations were found between ego-competence and either understanding of another person’s state by his/her nonverbal behavior, or accuracy of predicting the development of an interpersonal communication situation.

Discussion. The findings of the study suggest that adolescents’ ego-competence has ambiguous associations with particular components of the ability to understand others. Ego-competence is associated with respondents’ high estimates of their ability to understand others, but is not always accompanied by success in understanding of another person’s state by his/her nonverbal behavior and the accuracy of predicting the development of an interpersonal communication situation.

Highlights

  • Adolescents’ ego-competence is directly associated with a high level of self-rating of understanding others, but has no clear association with understanding non-verbal behaviour and with the accuracy of predicting the development of an interpersonal communication situation.
  • Ego-competent young boys and girls are characterized by a high level of personal communicative potential.
  • Personality traits have both general and specific associations with particular components of the ability to understand other people, which depend on the level of personal ego-competence.
https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.2.4
PDF Russian (Russian)
HTML (Russian)

References

Bodalev A. A., Vasina N. V. (eds.) Poznanie cheloveka chelovekom (vozrastnoi, gendernyi, etnicheskii i professional'nyi aspekty) [Cognition of a man by another man: Age, gender, ethnic, and professional aspects]. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2005. 322 p.

Andreeva G. M. Psikhologiya sotsial'nogo poznaniya [Psychology of social cognition]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2000. 288 p.

Yushachkova T. B. Lichnostnye determinanty sposobnosti k ponimaniyu drugikh lyudei [Personal determinants of the ability to understand others]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.). St. Petersburg, 2006. 194 p.

Bohl V. We read minds to shape relationships. Philosophical Psychology, 2015, V. 28, Issue 5, pp. 674–694. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2014.893607

Cabinio M., Rossetto F., Blasi V., et al. Mind-reading ability and structural connectivity changes in aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, V. 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01808

Habota Т., McLennan S. N., Cameron J., et al. An investigation of emotion recognition and theory of mind in people with chronic heart failure. PLoS one, 2015, V. 10 (11), e0141607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141607

Lecce S., Ceccato I., Bianco F., et al. Theory of mind and social relationships in older adults: The role of social motivation. Aging & Mental Health, 2017, Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 253–258. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1114586

Pezzuti L., Longobardi E., Rossetti S., et al. The relation between the theory of mind and socio-emotional functioning in a sample of older adults. Journal of Neurology and Psychology, 2015, V. 3, Issue 2, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.13188/2332-3469.1000021

Plana I., Lavoie M.-A., Battaglia M., Achim A. M. A meta-analysis and scoping review of social cognition performance in social phobia, posttraumatic stress disorder and other anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2014, V. 28, Issue 2, pp. 169–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.09.005

Buber M. Two Types of Faith. N. Y., Harper and Brothers, 1961 (Russ. ed.: Buber M. Dva obraza very. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1995. 464 p.).

Sartre J.-P. Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology. London and New York, Routledge, 2003 (Russ. ed.: Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2000. 639 p.).

Jaspers K. The world history of philosophy: Introduction (Russ. ed.: Yaspers K. Vsemirnaya istoriya filosofii. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2000. 272 p.).

Marx K., Engels F. Works: V. 23 (Russ. ed.: Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya. T. 23. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo politicheskoi literatury Publ., 1960. 907 p.).

Allport G. W. Personality: A psychological interpretation. N. Y., Henry Holt & Co, 1937. 588 p.

Borisova A. A. Psikhologicheskaya pronitsatel'nost' [Psychological insight]. Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publ., 1999. 447 p.

Labunskaya V. A. Ekspressiya cheloveka: obshchenie i mezhlichnostnoe poznanie [Human expression: Communication and interpersonal cognition]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1999. 608 p.

Kondrat'eva S. V. Mezhlichnostnoe ponimanie i ego rol' v obshchenii (na materiale srednei obshcheobrazovatel'noi shkoly) [Interpersonal understanding and its role in communication: A case study of secondary schools]. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psych.). Drogobych, 1977. 434 p.

Anan'ev B. G. O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya [On the problems of modern human study]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. 272 p.

Rubinshtein S. L. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2009. 720 p.

Bodalev A. A. Vospriyatie i ponimanie cheloveka chelovekom [Perception and cognition of a man by another man]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1982. 200 p.

Andreeva G. M. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya [Social psychology]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2006. 363 p.

Petrovskaya L. A. Obshchenie – kompetentnost' – trening [Communication, competence, and training]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 387 p.

Bodalev A. A. Psikhologiya obshcheniya [Psychology of communication]. Moscow, Institute of Practical Psychology Publ., 1996. 256 p.

Znakov V. V. Ponimanie v myshlenii, obshchenii, chelovecheskom bytii [Understanding in thinking, communication, and human existence]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, RAS Publ., 2007. 479 p.

Kronik A. A., Kronik E. A. Psikhologiya chelovecheskikh otnoshenii [Psychology of human relations]. Dubna, Feniks Publ., 1998. 224 p.

Kunitsyna V. N. Trudnosti mezhlichnostnogo obshcheniya [Difficulties in interpersonal communication]. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psych.). St. Petersburg, 1991. 358 p.

Bodalev A. A. Psikhologiya obshcheniya. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Psychology of communication: Encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2011. 600 p.

Mat'yash O. I., Pogol'sha V. M., Kazarinova N. V., Bibi S., Zaritskaya Zh. V. Mezhlichnostnaya kommunikatsiya: teoriya i zhizn' [Interpersonal communication: Theory and life]. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2011. 560 p.

Rean A. A. Psikhologiya poznaniya pedagogom lichnosti uchashchikhsya [Psychology of the teacher’s cognition of students’ personalities]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 80 p.

Strelkova I. E. Effect of personality traits on the adequacy of individuals’ evaluating each other. In: L. P. Doblaev (ed.) Problemy otsenivaniya v psikhologii [Evaluating problems in psychology]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1983, pp. 14–19.

Yuzhaninova A. L. Interrelation between social intelligence and particular individual personality traits. In: L. P. Doblaeva (ed.) Prikladnye problemy psikhologii lichnosti [Applied problems of personality psychology]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1985, pp. 65–73.

Manerov V. Kh. Eksperimental'no-teoreticheskie osnovy sotsial'noi identifikatsii i interpretatsii govoryashchego [Experimental and theoretical foundations for a speaker’s social identification and interpretation]. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psych.). St. Petersburg, 1993. 457 p.

Morozov V. P. Psychological portrait of a man constructed by nonverbal peculiarities of the speech. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2001, V. 22, no. 6, pp. 48–63 (in Russian).