Abstract
Introduction. By the end of the 19th century the society had to adapt to new threats—namely, increasing the number and activity of the proletariat masses and spreading socialist and anarchist ideas. Many researchers concentrated their study on characteristics of crowds. Scipio Sighele and Henry Fournial have been pioneers in this field.
Theoretical Basis. The paper describes two concepts which provided a starting point for studying crowds in foreign psychology. The main issues considered by Scipio Sighele and Henry Fournial were as follows: characteristics of the crowd as a social institution, its properties, activization factors, characteristics of leaders, personality changes within crowds, and the problem of criminal liability for mass crimes. The paper presents an innovative view of (a) the origin of excessive generalization of the crowd concept, (b) its uncritical acceptance in defining a number of social organizations, (c) and wrongful attributing characteristics of individual women to the crowd as the subject of mass action.
Results. The revealed tendencies and a clearly distorted perception of crowds among representatives of the anthropological and criminalistic approach determined the critical attitude towards new science of temporary social groups.
Discussion. A distinct trend towards isolated cognitive constructs and almost complete disregard for the study of the past contribute to a distorted understanding of the phenomenon of crowds in modern social psychology of spontaneous groups. The ideas of researchers of the past seem to be a necessary precondition for developing a holistic approach to this problem.
Highlights
- Sighele and H. Fournial created the background for scientific understanding of the phenomenon of crowds until the mid 20th century; they considered the characteristics of the crowd as a social institution, its properties, activization factors, characteristics of leaders, personality changes within crowds, the problem of criminal responsibility for mass crimes.
- Methodological weaknesses in S. Sighele’s and H. Fournial’s studies included: (a) attributing negative traits of criminal crowds to other crowd types, (b) attributing a reduced intellectual potential to any meeting, and (c) attributing characteristics of women in the crowd to the crowd as the subject of mass action.
- The heritage of S. Sighele, H. Fournial, and other researchers of the initial period can help in overcoming excessive individualism and rationalism in modern crowd psychology.
References
Aubry P. La contagion du meurte. Étude d’anthropologie criminelle. Paris, Félix Alcan, Éditeur, 1888. 184 p.
Wulfert A. Anthropological and positive school of criminal law in Italy: a critical study (Russ ed.: Vul'fert A. Antropologo-pozitivnaya shkola ugolovnogo prava v Italii: kriticheskoe issledovanie. Issue 1. Moscow, Tip. V. V. Islen'eva Publ., 1887. 510 p.).
McClelland J. S. The crowd and the mob: From Plato to Canetti. London, Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1989. 343 p.
Sighele S. La foule criminelle: Essai de psychologie collective (Russ. ed.: Sigele S. Prestupnaya tolpa. Opyt kollektivnoi psikhologii. St. Petersburg, Izd. F. Pavlenkova Publ., 1893. 116 p.).
Gallini C. Scipio Sighele et la foule délinquante. Hermes, 1988, no. 2, pp. 105–133.
Bon G., Le. Psychologie des foules (Russ. ed.: Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. St. Petersburg, Izd. F. Pavlenkova Publ., 1896. 329 p.).
Tarde G. Les crimes des foules (Russ. ed.: Prestupleniya tolpy. Kazan, Tipo-lit, Imperial University Publ., 1893. 44 p.).
Rossi P. Les suggesteurs et la foule. Paris, A. Michalon, 1904. 222 p.
Ross E. A. The mob mind. Appletons’ Popular Science Monthly, 1897, V. 51, no. 22, pp. 390–397.
Gorbatov D. S., Bol'shakov S. N. Teorii tolpy v rossiiskoi psikhologicheskoi mysli kontsa XIX – nachala XX vv. [The crowd theory in Russian psychological thought in the late 19th and early 20th century]. St. Petersburg, Art-Xpress Publ., 2015. 108 p.
Rubio V. Le regard sociologique sur la foule à la fin du XIX siècle. Mil neuf cent. Revue d'histoire intellectuelle, 2010, no. 1 (28), pp. 13–33.
Lazzeri C. La contagion des émotions entre psychologie sociale et sociologie, de Le Bon à Durkheim. Problemata: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 2016, V. 7, no. 3, pp. 133–156. DOI: 10.7443/problemata.v7i3.32091
Chirkova E. V. Anatomiya finansovogo puzyrya [The anatomy of a financial bubble]. Moscow, Keis Publ., 2010. 416 p.
Frachette C. Le Médecin-Inspecteur Général Henri Fournial (1866–1932). Histoire des Sciences Médicales, 1986, V. 20, no. 4, pp. 381–390.
Fournial H. Essai sur la psychologie des foules: considérations médico-judiciaires sur les responsabilités collectives. Lyon, A. Storck; Paris, G. Masson, 1892. 113 p.
Sighele S. Psychologie des sectes. Paris, V. Giard & E. Brière, 1898. 231 p.
Barrows S. Miroirs déformants. Réflexions sur la foule en France à la fin du XIXe siècle. Paris, Aubier, 1990. 226 p.
Bellamy R. The advent of the masses and the making of the modern theory of democracy. In: T. Ball, R. Bellamy (eds.) The Cambridge history of twentieth-century political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 70–103. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521563543.005
Tarde G. Tarde G. Les lois de l’imitation (Russ. ed.: Zakony podrazhaniya. St. Petersburg, Izd. F. Pavlenkova, 1892. 370 p.).
Sighele S. U’intelligenza della folla. Torino, F. Bocca, 1903. 166 p.
Tarde G. Foules et sectes au point de vue criminal. Revue des Deux Mondes. 1893, 15 novembre, pp. 349–387.
Voitolovskii L. Ocherki kollektivnoi psikhologii: v dvukh chastyakh. Ch. 2. Psikhologiya obshchestvennykh dvizhenii [Essays on collective psychology in two volumes. Volume 2: The psychology of social movements]. Moscow, Petrograd, Gos. izdatel'stvo Publ., 1925. 118 p.
Dobrovol'skii I. I. The psychology of criminal crowd. Russkaya mysl' – Russian Thought, 1894, Issue 12, pp. 130–158 (in Russian).
Cazanove F. Les femmes dans la foule: leur responsabilité criminelle. Bordeaux, Y. Cadoret, 1904. 120 p.
Sluchevskii V. K. The crowd and its psychology. Knizhki nedeli – Books of the Week, 1893, no. 5, pp. 5–23 (in Russian).
Shirkov V. P. Crimes of the crowd under the new criminal code: constructing responsibility. Zhurnal Ministerstva Yustitsii – Journal of the Ministry of Justice, 1904, no. 3, pp. 90–124 (in Russian).
Blumer H. Collective behavior. In: New Outline of the Principles of Sociology. N. Y., Barnes & Noble, 1951, pp. 167–221.
Brighenti A. M. La folla delinquente: Scipio Sighele, la psicologia delle folle e le origini della sociologia del XX secolo. Altre Storie, 2013, no. 41, pp. 16–18.
Reicher S. The psychology of crowd dynamics. In: M. A. Hogg, R. S. Tindale (eds.) Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes. Oxford, Blackwell, 2001, pp. 182–208. DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458
Spears R., Postmes T. Group identity, social influence and collective action online: Extensions and applications of the SIDE model. In: S. S. Sundar (ed.) The handbook of the psychology of communication technology. Oxford, Wiley Blackwell, 2015, pp. 23–46. DOI: 10.1002/9781118426456
Drury J., Stott C. Contextualizing the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary Social Science, 2011, V. 6, Issue 3, pp. 275–288. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2011.625626
Borch C. The exclusion of the crowd: The destiny of a sociological figure of the irrational. European Journal of Social Theory, 2006, V. 9, Issue 1, pp. 83–102. DOI: 10.1177/1368431006060464