Abstract
Expanding and complex social realities cause new types of identity. Variety
in organizations and workgroups (where people are involved), implies a
special kind of social identity which can be defined as professional, organizational
or managerial. The study of the social identity processes in organizations
is a new interdisciplinary sphere that is presented especially commonly
in European Social Psychology. The result of its theoretical comprehension is
Social Identity Theory. In the article listed and analyzed, foreign theoretical
elaborations and empirical studies in the area: organizational identity and organizational
identification, social identity theory and leadership; labor motivation
and target designation, and amalgamations and differences in organizations.
References
Андреева Г.М. Психология социального познания. Аспект Пресс, М., 2000.
Липатов С.А. Преданность организации как проблема организацион-ной психологии // Ежегодник российского психологического сообщества. Психология и её приложения, т.9, вып.3, М., 2002.
Управление персоналом под ред. Базарова Т.Ю., Ерёмина Б.Л., М., ЮНИТИ, 2001.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. Social identity theory and the organization. //Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14.
Brewer, M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.// Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17.
Brown R, Williams J.A. Group Identification: the same thing to all people? // Human Relations, 1884, 37.
Brown R. Social Identity Theory: past achievements, current problems and future challengers.// European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, Agenda 2000.
Cheney G., & Tompkins, P. K. Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment.// Central States Speech Journal, 1987, 38.
Hennessy J., West M. Intergroup behavior in organizations // Small Group Research, Jun1999, Vol. 30, Issue 3.
Hogg M. A. Social Identity Theory of Leadership. // Personality & Social Psychology Review , 2001, Vol. 5, Issue 3.
Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. // Administrative Science Quarterly, 44.
Johnson W., Johnson A., Heimerg F. A primary- and second-order compo-nent analysis of the organizational identification questionnaire.// Educa-tional & Psychological Measurement, Feb1999, Vol. 59 Issue 1.
Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & DeVader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. The romance of leadership.// Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30.
Patchen, M. Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance. An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge University Press,1999.
Sidanius, J.; Pratto, F. In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. // Journal of Social Psychology, Apr1994, Vol. 134 Issue 2.
Simon, H. A. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press, 1976.
Van Knippenberg D., Haslam A. Diversity and Identity. (to appear in Van Knippenberg D., Haslam A., Platow M., Ellemers N. Social identity at work: developing theory for organizational practice. New York: Taylor & Francis).
Van Knippenberg D., Van Knippenberg B. Organizational Identification af-ter a Merger: A Social Identity Perspective. British Journal of Social Psy-chology, in press.
Van Knippenberg D.; van Schie, Els C. M. Foci and correlates of organiza-tional identification.// Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, Jun2000, Vol. 73 Issue 2.
Wegge J., Haslam S. Group goal setting, social identity and self-categorization: engaging the collective self to enhance group performance and organizational outcomes. Manuscript under review.
Липатов С.А. Преданность организации как проблема организацион-ной психологии // Ежегодник российского психологического сообщества. Психология и её приложения, т.9, вып.3, М., 2002.
Управление персоналом под ред. Базарова Т.Ю., Ерёмина Б.Л., М., ЮНИТИ, 2001.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. Social identity theory and the organization. //Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14.
Brewer, M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.// Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17.
Brown R, Williams J.A. Group Identification: the same thing to all people? // Human Relations, 1884, 37.
Brown R. Social Identity Theory: past achievements, current problems and future challengers.// European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, Agenda 2000.
Cheney G., & Tompkins, P. K. Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment.// Central States Speech Journal, 1987, 38.
Hennessy J., West M. Intergroup behavior in organizations // Small Group Research, Jun1999, Vol. 30, Issue 3.
Hogg M. A. Social Identity Theory of Leadership. // Personality & Social Psychology Review , 2001, Vol. 5, Issue 3.
Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. // Administrative Science Quarterly, 44.
Johnson W., Johnson A., Heimerg F. A primary- and second-order compo-nent analysis of the organizational identification questionnaire.// Educa-tional & Psychological Measurement, Feb1999, Vol. 59 Issue 1.
Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & DeVader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. The romance of leadership.// Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30.
Patchen, M. Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance. An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge University Press,1999.
Sidanius, J.; Pratto, F. In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. // Journal of Social Psychology, Apr1994, Vol. 134 Issue 2.
Simon, H. A. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press, 1976.
Van Knippenberg D., Haslam A. Diversity and Identity. (to appear in Van Knippenberg D., Haslam A., Platow M., Ellemers N. Social identity at work: developing theory for organizational practice. New York: Taylor & Francis).
Van Knippenberg D., Van Knippenberg B. Organizational Identification af-ter a Merger: A Social Identity Perspective. British Journal of Social Psy-chology, in press.
Van Knippenberg D.; van Schie, Els C. M. Foci and correlates of organiza-tional identification.// Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, Jun2000, Vol. 73 Issue 2.
Wegge J., Haslam S. Group goal setting, social identity and self-categorization: engaging the collective self to enhance group performance and organizational outcomes. Manuscript under review.