Ethnically Mixed Marriages through the Phenomenon of Marriage Satisfaction
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

marriage
matrimony
bi-ethnic marriage
mono-ethnic marriages
quality of marriage
criteria of marriage
marriage satisfaction
stability of marriage
broadened family
conflicts

Abstract

The paper brings forward results of the empirical study of the phenomenon of marriage satisfaction in bi-ethnic and mono-ethnic officially married couples. The authors distinguish the following main characteristics of marriage satisfaction: personal, mutual, average for a married couple, characteristics according to spheres of marriage (household, sexual-erotic, leisure, psychotherapeutic, birth and upbringing of children, unanimity of views and judgments of relatives and friends), features of conflicts in bi-ethnic and mono-ethnic marriages. Methods of the study included (a) the analysis of the literature on the problem, (b) psycho-diagnostic method, (c) comparisons of respondent groups, and (d) methods of qualitative and quantitative and statistical analysis of the results. Methodological tools included the “Marriage Satisfaction” test by O. O. Eremicheva
and L. Ia. Gozman (in the adaptation of A. I. Tashcheva) and A. I. Tashcheva’s questionnaire for studying basic socio-demographic, socio-economic and other 19 characteristics of married couples.
Partners of 30 officially married couples at the age from 25 to 35 (Russians, Armenians, Ossetians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Georgians) took part in the empirical study. From the results obtained in the present investigation the following conclusions were made. First, if to compare with bi-ethnic couples, mono-ethnic couples had
reliably higher marital satisfaction in whole. Second, mono-ethnic couples had reliably higher scores in characteristics according to spheres of marriage (household, sexual-erotic, leisure, psychotherapeutic, birth and upbringing of children, unanimity
of views and judgments of relatives and friends).

The findings are of direct practical relevance and can be useful in psychological centers when working with marrying and divorcing couples with a different ethnic composition for the initial diagnostics of the quality of relationship in marriage, prevention and psychological correction of destructive marital conflicts to optimize the quality of marital relationship as a basic means of productive positive implementation of the state population policy.
This paper presents a part of a broader study entitled “Marital conflicts in bi- etnic couples at the age of early maturity” [7].

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2016.3.3
PDF (Russian)

References

Aleshina Iu. E. Udovletvorennost' brakom i mezhlichnostnoe vospriiatie v supruzheskikh parakh s razlichnym stazhem sovmestnoi zhizni [Marriage satisfaction and interpersonal perception in married couples with various duration of their life together]. Vestnik MGU. Seriia 14. Psikhologiia – Bulletin of Moscow State University, Series 14. Psychology, 1987, no. 2, pp. 60–71.
Vorontsov D. V. Kvir-teoriia: perspektivy psikhologicheskogo analiza seksual'nosti [Queer theory: prospects of psychological analysis of sexuality]. Voprosy psikhologii – Approaches to Psychology, 2012, no. 2, pp. 153–162.
Gridneva S. V., Tashcheva A. I. Otsenka effektivnosti deiatel'nosti sistemy protivodeistviia ideologii terrorizma v molodezhnoi srede [Estimating the efficiency of the system of counteraction to the ideology of terrorism in the youth environment]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2013, V. 10, no. 5, pp. 23–31.
Karabanova O. A. Psikhologiia semeinykh otnoshenii i osnovy semeinogo konsul'tirovaniia [The psychology of family relations and fundamentals of family counseling]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2008. 320 p.
Kutiavina E. E., Malysheva S. K. Raznoetnicheskaia sem'ia kak sreda formirovaniia etnicheskoi identichnosti lichnosti [Multi-ethnic families the environment for the formation of ethnic identity of the person]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriia: Sotsial'nye nauki – Bulletin of N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2010, no. 2, pp. 47–52.
The population of the Rostov region: Federal state statistics service. Available at: http://rostov.gks.ru
Proskurnikova S. I. Supruzheskie konflikty v bietnicheskikh parakh v vozraste rannei zrelosti: Vypusknaia kvalifikatsionnaia rabota [Marital conflicts in bi-ethnic couples at the age of early maturity: graduate qualification work]. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Publ., 2016. 99 p.
Stefanenko T. G. Etnopsikhologiia [Ethnopsychology]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2014. 352 p.
Stefanenko T. G. Etnopsikhologiia [Ethnopsychology]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2013. 224 p.
Tashcheva A. I. Atributivnye protsessy v supruzheskikh konfliktakh. Diss. kand. psikh. nauk [Attributive processes in marital conflicts. Cand. psych. sci. diss]. Moscow, 1987.
Tashcheva A. I., Kireeva L. E. Rolevoe povedenie suprugov «dvukhkar'ernogo» braka [Role behavior of spouses of a dual-career marriage]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2011, V. 8, no. 4, pp. 44–55.
Tashcheva A. I., Frondzei S. N. Lichnostnye determinanty osobennostei supruzheskikh konfliktov v neofitsial'nom i ofitsial'nom molodezhnykh brakakh [Personal determinants of characteristics of marital conflicts in informal and official marriages of young people]. Izvestiia Iuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki – Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Pedagogical Sciences, 2012, no. 1, pp. 118–126.
Tashcheva A. I., Frondzei S. N. Neofitsial'nye i ofitsial'nye molodezhnye sem'i [Informal and official youth families]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gos. un-ta. Seriia Pedagogika i Psikhologiia – Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series Pedagogy and Psychology, 2011, no. 1, pp. 157–165.
Tashcheva A. I., Frondzei S. N. Osobennosti supruzheskikh konfliktov v vysoko udovletvorennykh brakom parakh [Features of marital conflicts in couples with high marriage satisfaction]. Izvestiia Iuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki – Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Technical Sciences, 2005, no. 7 (51), pp. 127–129.
Abakumova I. V., Yermakov P. N. On development of a tolerant personality in multicultural education. Questions of psychology, 2003, I. 3, pp. 78–82.
Afanasenko I. V., Tashcheva A. I., Gabdulina L. I. System of values of the youth in the light of its social frustration. The Social Sciences, 2015, 10 (6), pp. 1287–1290.
Connell R. W. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1987.
de Lauretis T. “Habit Changes”. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 1994, V. 6, pp. 296–313.
Gridneva S. V., Tashcheva A. I. Traditions of family mutual relations in the context of Beslan’s terrorist attack. Virtual Presentation at the ICEEPSY International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology. Kyrenia, Cyprus: Elsevier Ltd. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014.
Katz J. N. The Invention of Heterosexuality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Queer Read This: A leaflet distributed at pride march in NY. Published anonymously by Queers. The Queer Resources Directory. Available at: http://www.qrd.org/qrd/misc/text/queers.read.this
Weeks J. The “homosexual role” after 30 years: An appreciation of the work of Mary McIntosh. Sexualities, 1998, V. 1 (2), pp. 131–152.