Abstract
The article considers the problem of alternative ways of working with children and young people when realizing the Federal State Educational Standards of the second generation and sense-value pedagogy. The authors analyze the current state of knowledge and elaboration of the concept of “psychotechnique” and provide a detailed de]nition of this concept, taking into account its historical development.
The authors consider alternatives of classification, depending on the key criteria: psychotechniques which belong to any theoretical and practical direction (behaviorism, psychoanalysis, Gestalt and humanistic approaches); psychotechniques of classic, developing, and non-traditional training; psychotechniques grouped according to the principle of information coding, which includes verbal, audiovisual, machine-learning, multimedia, hypertext, holographic ones and other; psychotechniques based on the principle of quantity (individual,
group, and mass). The model of emanation which is the most interesting to authors is based on the principle of sense-imagery.
The o^ered classi]cation model substantiates the uniqueness of a special group of psychotechniques – sense techniques – which underlie the technology of sense training. The authors argue that their development and use in the educational process at various stages of training is urgent. They also describe types of sense techniques in detail and reveal their nature and possibilities of the pedagogical introduction in the education and training of children and young people. The article summarizes data on some studies of the in_uence of sense
techniques on the formation of motivation, in sense-value choice situations, in problem and project tasks. For the purpose of giving a complete information and analytical picture of the modern use of sense techniques in psychotherapy, advertising, politics, sociology, and other ]elds of anthropological knowledge the authors review them, emphasizing the importance of the development of a sense-technical approach, its prospects and ecological compatibility among other psychotechniques.
References
Abakumova I. V., Ermakov P. N., Fomenko V. T. Novodidaktika. Kniga 1. Metodologiia i tekhnologii obucheniia: v poiskakh razvivaiushchego resursa [New didactics. Book 1. Methodology and technology of education: in search of the developing resource]. Moscow, KREDO Publ., 2013.
Abakumova I. V., Ermakov P. N., Fomenko V. T. Novodidaktika. Kniga 2. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii: novyerakursy [New didactics. Book 2. Educational technologies: new perspectives]. Moscow, KREDO Publ., 2013.
Agafonov A. Iu. Psikhologicheskie osnovy pedagogiki [Psychological bases of pedagogy]. Moscow, 2002.
Agafonov A. Iu. Chelovek kak smyslovaia model’ mira [A man as a sense model of the world]. Samara, 2000.
Asmolov A. G. Po tu storonu soznaniia: metodologicheskie problemy neklassicheskoi psikhologii [Beyond consciousness: methodological problems of nonclassical psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002.
Bozhovich E. D. Protsess ucheniia: kontrol’, diagnostika, korrektsiia, otsenka [The learning process: control, diagnostics, correction, assessment]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social University Publ., 1999, 224 p.
Bozhovich E. D. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy razvitiia shkol’nika, kak sub”ekta ucheniia [Psychological and pedagogical problems of the development of a pupil as a subject of learning]. Moscow, Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 2000.
Bol’shunova N. Ia. Psikhologicheskie usloviia vospitaniia sensornoi kul’tury rebenka [Psychological conditions of the sensory culture education in the child]. Novosibirsk, SNSh Publ., 2002.
Bol’shunova N. Ia. Usloviia i sredstva razvitiia sub”ektnosti. Diss. dokt. psikh. nauk [Conditions and means of the development of subjectivity. Dr. psych. sci. diss]. Novosibirsk, 2007.
Vasiliuk F. E. Psikhologiia perezhivaniia. Analiz preodoleniia kriticheskikh situatsii [The psychology of experience. The analysis of overcoming critical situations]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1984.
Virtts U., Tsobeli I. Zhazhda smysla: chelovek v ekstremal’nykh situatsiiakh [Thirst for sense: people in extreme situations. Limits of psychotherapy]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2014.
Dotsenko E. L. Psikhologiia manipuliatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmyi zashchita [The psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms, and defense]. Moscow, CheRo, Moscow State University Publ., 1997, 344 p.
Ermakov P. N. Preodolenietsennostno-smyslovykhbar’erovkakpedagogicheskaia problema [Overcoming of value-sense barriers as a pedagogical problem]. Rostov-on-Don, 2012.
Zilberbrand N. Iu. Osobennosti didakticheskogo modelirovaniia smyslovykh zadach v praktike obrazovatel’nogo protsessa. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Features of the didactic modeling sense problems in the practice of the educational process. Cand. ped. sci. diss]. Rostov-on-Don, 2014. Zinchenko V. P. Zhivoe znanie [Living knowledge]. Samara, 1998.
Kagermazova L. Ts. Manipuliativnaia i konventsional’naia strategii smyslotekhnicheskogo vozdeistviia v uchebnom protsesse [Manipulative and conventional strategies of the sense technical inftuence in the educational process]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2008, V. 5, no. 4, pp. 86–89.
Kagermazova L. Ts. Smyslovye kommunikatsii v uchebnom protsesse: teoriia i tekhnologiia napravlennoi transliatsii smyslov v obuchenii [Sense communication in the educational process: theory and technology of the directed transmission of senses in education]. Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkarian State University Publ., 2008.
Karpova O. S. Pedagogicheskii potentsial tsennostno-smyslovoi problemnoi situatsii v dukhovnom vospitanii podrostka [The pedagogical potential of a sense-value problem situation in the spiritual education of adolescents]. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Innovatsii: Iuzhnoe izmerenie– Education. Science. Innovation: the Southern Dimension, 2010, no. 5 (15).
Kotova S. A. Rol’ psikhologicheskikh tekhnologii v modernizatsii sovremennogo obrazovaniia [The role of psychological technologies in modernization of modern education]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniia – Bulletin of the Practical Psychology of Education, 2011, no. 2 (27), pp. 46–48.
Leontiev A. N. Deiatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1977.
Leontiev D. A. Psikhologiia smysla [The psychology of sense]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000.
Lerner I. Y. Didakticheskie osnovy metodov obucheniia [Didactic bases of teaching methods]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1981.
Lengle A., Ukolova E. M., Shumskii V. B. Sovremennyi ekzistentsial’nyi analiz: istoriia, teoriia, praktika, issledovaniia [Modern existential analysis: history, theory, practice, research]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2014, 556 p.
Mironenkova N. N. Osobennosti didakticheskogo modelirovaniia situatsii tsennostno-smyslovogo vybora obuchaiushchikhsia. Diss. kand. psikh. nauk [Features of the didactic modeling of sense-value choice situations among students. Cand. psych. sci. diss]. Rostov-on-Don, 2011.
Nasinovskaia E. E. Deiatel’nostnaia paradigma v izuchenii motivatsii lichnosti. Psikhologicheskaia teoriia deiatel’nosti: vchera, segodnia, zavtra [Activity paradigm in the study of the person’s motivation. Psychological theory of activity: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006, pp. 161–174.
Zankov L. V. Obuchenie i razvitie [Training and development]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1966.
Oleshkevich V. I. Istoriia psikhotekhniki [The history of psychotechnique]. Moscow, Akademiia Publ., 2002, 304 p.
Kolechenko A. K. Pritchi, skazki, metafory v razvitii rebenka [Parables, tales, metaphors in child development]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2006.
Rudakova I. A. Teoriia i praktika metodov obucheniia v sovremennoi didakticheskoi interpretatsii [Theory and practice of teaching methods in a modern didactic interpretation]. Rostov-on-Don, 2004.
Rudakova I. A. Formirovanie innovatsionnoi klassifikatsii metodov obucheniia v sovremennoi didaktike [Formation of innovative classi[cation of methods in modern didactics]. Izvestiia vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki – Proceedings of the Universities. North Caucasus Region. Social Sciences, 2005, no. 3, pp. 104–107.
Skliar S. S. Didakticheskie osnovy razvitiia otvetstvennosti u starsheklassnikov. Diss. kand. psikh. nauk [Didactic foundations for the development of responsibility in senior pupil. Cand. psych. sci. diss]. Rostov-on-Don, 2010.
Tishchenko N. G. Postroenie protsessa obucheniia na obrazno-
emotsional’noi osnove. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Constructing the learning process on [gurative-emotional basis. Cand. ped. sci. diss]. Rostov-on-Don, 2007, 22 p.
Fomenko V. T. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii: novye rakursy [Educational technologies: new perspectives]. Rostov-on-Don, 2012.
Chudnovskii V. E. Smyslozhiznennyi aspekt sovremennogo protsessa obrazovaniia [Sense-of-life aspect of modern education]. Voprosy psikhologii– Approaches to Psychology, 2009, no. 4, P. 50.
Shchurkova N. E. Lektsii o vospitanii [Lectures on education]. Moscow, Pedagogicheskii poisk Publ., 2009.
Shchurkova N. E. Nezhnaia pedagogika [Gentle pedagogy]. Moscow, Pedagogicheskii poisk Publ., 2005, 160 p.
Shchurkova N. E. Pedagogicheskaia tekhnologiia [Pedagogical technology]. Moscow, Pedagogical Society of Russia Publ., 2002, 94 p.
Yakimanskaya I. S. Lichnostno-orientirovannaia shkola: kriterii i protsedury analiza i otsenki ee deiatel’nosti [personality-centered school: criteria and procedures for analysis and assessment of its activity]. Direktor shkoly – School Director, 2003, no. 6, pp. 27–36.
Yakimanskaya I. S. Razrabotka tekhnologii lichnostno-orientirovannogo obucheniia [Elaboration of the technology of personality-centered training]. Voprosy psikhologii – Approaches to Psychology, 1995, no. 2, pp. 31–42.
Andersen N. The self-infantilized adult and the management of personality // Critical Discourse Studies, 2007, no. 3, pp. 331–352.
Harjunen E. How do teachers view their own pedagogical authority? // Teacher and Teaching theory and practice, 2009, no. 1, pp. 109–129.
McKeon F., Harrison J. Developing pedagogical practice and professional identities of beginning teacher educators // Professional Development in Education, 2010, no. 1–2, pp. 25–44.