Abstract
Introduction. The present paper analyses the origination of the quantum psychology concept, its main proposition and features, which correspond to the status of marginal science (parapsychology). Particular attention is paid to psychological characteristics of the individuals who study parapsychological phenomena.
Theoretical Basis. In the second half of the 20th century postmodern changes have contributed to the decrease in the axiological status of science. Furthermore, Western scientific rationality has drawn near to Oriental mysticism. Discoveries in quantum mechanics have determined drastic changes in the view of the physical world. These discoveries were in contradiction with classical physics and common sense. Changes in the world view have been combined with postmodern transformations of science. The role of implicit knowledge, interpretative thinking, and the fundamental nonremovability of subjectivity in results of scientific knowledge has increased significantly.
The application of the quantum corpuscular-wave laws to brain and psychic activity was a theoretical basis for the concept of quantum psychology. The direct use (instead of metaphorical application) of quantum effects in psychology is groundless from the point of view of academic physics and psychology. According to psychological characteristics quantum psychology is a parapsychological field of psychic phenomena, as it recognizes transmission of information without known sense organs, as well as mental influence on physical objects. From a philosophical point of view the quantum concept of consciousness is a kind of contemporary physiological (physical) reductionism, which was defined as “vulgar materialism” in the past.
The study (a) analyses the reasons for a person to be interested in the paranormal, which results in the popularity of ideas of quantum psychology; (b) presents a classification of the psychological characteristics and motivation of the individuals interested in psychic phenomena; (c) highlights various negative consequences of a high social activity among authors of parapsychological concepts and practices.
Conclusion. Quantum psychology has no scientific grounds for being considered as a “normal” science. Nowadays theoretical and methodological grounds for quantum psychology are discussed. Quantum psychology is considered as a marginal science.
References
Gergen K. J. Toward a postmodern psychology. In: Psychology and postmodernism. London, Sage Press, 1997, pp. 17–30.
Menskii M. B. The concept of consciousness in the context of quantum mechanics. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 2005, V. 175, no. 4, pp. 413–435 (in Russian).
Uilson R. Kvantovaya psikhologiya [Quantum psychology]. Kyiv, Sofia Publ., 1998. 224 p.
Hameroff S., Penrose R. Orchestrated objective reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: The “Orch OR” model for consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1998, V. 356, pp. 1869–1896.
Kruglyakov E. P. Highway scientists. In: Komissiya po bor'be s lzhenaukoi RAN [The RAS commission to combat pseudoscience]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009. 359 p.
Stenger V. The myth of quantum consciousness. The Humanist, 1992, V. 53, no. 3, pp. 13–15.
Petrenko V. F., Suprun A. P. Theoretical and methodological problems of psychology: the relationship between quantum physics and the psychology of consciousness. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2014, V. 35, no. 6, pp. 69–86 (in Russian).
Searle D. R. The mystery of consciousness. The New York Review of Books, 1995, no. 2, pp. 53–88.
Kornilova T. V., Smirnov S. D. Metodologicheskie osnovy psikhologii [Methodological foundations of psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2007. 320 p.
Yurevich A. V. Science and parascience: A collision on the “territory of psychology”. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2005, V. 26, pp. 79–87 (in Russian).
Walker E. H. The nature of consciousness. Mathematical Biosciences, 1970, V. 7, pp. 131–178.
Lipkin A. I. A myth about an observer’s consciousness special role in quantum mechanics. Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennogo estestvoznaniya – Actual Problems of Modern Science, 2005, V. 3, pp. 31–43 (in Russian).
Krasil'nikov G. T. “Mental realities” in psychotherapy. Psikhoterapiya – Psychotherapy, 2009, no. 2, pp. 21–26 (in Russian).
Tegmark M. Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review, 2000, V. 61, no. 4, pp. 4194–4206.
Davis M. Is mathematical insight algorithmic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1995, V. 13, no. 4, pp. 659–660.
Dubrov A. P. Kognitivnaya psikhofizika [Cognitive psychophysics]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2006. 301 p.
Golovin S. Yu. Slovar' psikhologa-praktika [A practical psychologist’s dictionary]. Minsk Kharvest Publ., 2001. 976 p.
Meshcheryakova B. G., Zinchenko V. P. (eds.). Bol'shoi psikhologicheskii slovar' [Large psychological dictionary]. Moscow, AST, AST Moskva Publ., 2009. 816 p.
Corsini R., Auerbach A. Concise Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1996 (Russ. ed.: Psikhologicheskaya entsiklopediya, pod red. R. Korzini i A. Auerbakha, St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2006. 1876 p.).
Penkin S. A. Filosofskii analiz kvantovoi kontseptsii soznaniya [Philosophical analysis of the quantum concept of consciousness]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philos.). Moscow, 2006. 150 p.
Gritsanov A. A. Istoriya filosofii : Entsiklopediya [The history of philosophy: Encyclopedia]. Minsk, Interpresservis, Knizhnyi Dom Publ., 2002. 1376 p.
Leibin V. M. Psikhoanaliz [Psychoanalysis]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 592 p.
Kazhinskii B. B. Biologicheskaya radiosvyaz' [Biological radio communication]. Kiev, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1963. 171 p.
Vasil'ev L. L. Vnushenie na rasstoyanii [Suggestion at a distance]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1962. 160 p.
Akimov A. E., Tarasenko V. Ya., Shipov G. I. Torsion fields as a cosmophysical factor. Biofizika – Biophysics, 1995, V. 40, no. 4 (July–August), pp. 938–943 (in Russian).
Frazer J. G. The golden bough: A study in magic and religion (Russ. ed.: Frezer D. D. Zolotaya vetv': issledovaniya magii i religii. Moscow, AST Publ., 1998. 764 p.).
Mendeleev D. I. Two public readings on spiritualism. In: K poznaniyu Rossii [Toward understanding Russia]. Moscow, Airis-press Publ., 2002. pp. 509–526.
Uspenskii P. D. V poiskakh chudesnogo [In search of the miraculous]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo Chernyshova Publ., 1994. 242 p.
Kurtz P. The transcendental temptation (Russ. ed.: Kurtts P. Iskushenie potustoronnim. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 1999. 601 p.).
Lem S. O sverkhchuvstvennom poznanii [On extra-sensory knowledge]. Moscow, AST, AST Moskva Publ., 2009, pp. 438 (in Russian).
Kitaigorodskii A. I. Reniksa [Renyxa]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1967. 240 p.
Lau M. Y. Postmodernism and the values of science. American Psychologist, 2002, V. 57, no. 12, pp. 1126–1127.
Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Unified psychology. American Psychologist, 2001, V. 56, no. 12, pp. 1069–1079.
Simonov P. V. Sozidayushchii mozg: neirobiologicheskie osnovy tvorchestva [The creating brain: the neurobiological foundations of creativity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 108 p.