Professionally Important Qualities and Professional Achievement Among Inspectors in the State Small Vessels Inspectorate of EMERCOM of Russia
PDF Russian

Keywords

inspector
professional achievement
efficiency of professional activities
professionally important qualities
expert survey
expert evaluation
relationship
prediction of achievement
correlation analysis
statistical significance

Abstract

Introduction. This paper continues a previous study on professionally important qualities of inspectors in the State Small Vessels Inspectorate (SSVI) of EMERCOM of Russia. Professionally important qualities contribute to professional achievement among inspectors in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia. This is a prerequisite for a unitary methodological approach to the selection of a candidate for a position of an inspector in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia. The aim of the study is to determine the relationships among professionally important qualities of inspectors in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia and professional achievement among the surveyed specialists.

Methods. An expert survey and statistical treatment of data helped to measure professional achievement. The survey revealed assessments of professional achievement for each participant. An integral expert assessment was an external criterion for professional achievement among inspectors in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia.

Results. The results indicated that professionally important qualities of inspectors in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia determined their professional achievement. At the same time the whole complex of professionally important qualities promoted more effective performance of professional activities.

Discussion. The previously revealed professionally important qualities can predict professional achievement among inspectors in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia. The findings can be readily used in professional psychological selection for the position of an inspector in the SSVI of EMERCOM of Russia in order to reduce negative psychological consequences, psychosomatic and other diseases associated with professional activities.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.1.6
PDF Russian

References

Bessonova Yu. V. Psychological features of professional motivation in extreme conditions. In: Bodrov V. A. (ed.) Professional'naya prigodnost': sub"ektno-deyatel'nostnyi podkhod [Professional suitability: a subject-activity approach]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2004, pp. 113–137.

Bodrov V. A. Psikhologiya professional'noi prigodnosti [Psychology of professional suitability]. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2001. 511 p.

Dikaya L. G., Zankovskii A. N. (eds.) Psikhologicheskie problemy professional'noi deyatel'nosti [Psychological problems of professional activity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991. 166 p.

Klimov E. A. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu truda [An introduction to labor psychology]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 336 p.

Anan'ev B. G. O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya [On the problems of modern human study]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. 272 p.

Bratus' B. S. On the problem of personality development in adulthood. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 1980, no. 2, pp. 3–12 (in Russian).

Vygotskii L. S. Child psychology. In: Sobranie sochinenii v 6 tomakh [Collected works in 6 volumes]. Moscow, Govoryashchaya kniga Publ., 2004, V. 4. 432 p.

Klimov E. A. Psikhologiya professionala: izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [A professional’s psychology: Selected psychological works]. Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 2003. 456 p.

Kon I. S. Psikhologiya yunosheskogo vozrasta [The psychology of early adolescence]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1979. 90 p.

Obukhova L. F. Detskaya vozrastnaya psikhologiya [Child age psychology]. Moscow, Russian Pedagogical Society Publ., 2000. 272 p.

Erikson E. Identity: youth and crisis. New York, W. W. Norton Company, 1968 (Russ. ed.: Erikson E. Identichnost': yunost' i krizis. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2006. 352 p.).

Rodina O. N. On the concept of labour achievement. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 1996, no. 3, pp. 60–67 (in Russian).

Dushkov B. A., Korolev A. V., Smirnov B. A. Psikhologiya truda, professional'noi, informatsionnoi i organizatsionnoi deyatel'nosti [Professional, informational, organizational, and labor psychology]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2005. 848 p.

Maizel' N. I., Nebylitsyn V. D., Teplov B. M. Psychological problems of selection. In: Leont'ev A. N., Zinchenko V. P., Panov D. Yu. (eds.) Inzhenernaya psikhologiya [Engineering psychology]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1964, pp. 387–396.

Tolochek V. A. Sovremennaya psikhologiya truda [Modern psychology of labor]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2010. 432 p.

Dmitrieva M. A., Druzhilov S. A. Levels and criteria of professionalism: Problems of a modern professional’s development. Sibir'. Filosofiya. Obrazovanie – Sibir. Philosophy. Education, 2000, no. 4, pp. 18–30 (in Russian).

Manukhina S. Yu. Psikhologiya truda [Labor psychology]. Moscow, EAOI Publ., 2009. 320 p.

Shadrikov V. D. Psikhologiya deyatel'nosti cheloveka [Psychology of human activity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2013. 464 p.

Shadrikov V. D. Problems of professional abilities. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1982, no. 5, pp. 13–26 (in Russian).

Lavrova N. A. Vliyanie lichnostnykh osobennostei na uspeshnost' professional'noi deyatel'nosti v sisteme “chelovek – chelovek” [The effect of personal characteristics on professional achievement in the “human–human” system]. Tezisy moskovskoi mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Psikhodiagnostika: oblasti primeneniya, problemy, perspektivy razvitiya” [Proc. Moscow Interuniversity Theoretical and Practical Conference “Psychodiagnostics: applications, challenges, and prospects”]. Moscow, MISSO Publ., 2003. 195 p.

Karacharova Yu. A. Psikhologicheskie faktory professional'noi uspeshnosti uchastkovogo vracha-terapevta [Psychological factors of professional achievement among local doctors]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.). Tver, 2010. 211 p.

Khammer Ya. S. Professional achievement and its determinants. Voprosy psikhologii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 147–153 (in Russian).

Nebylitsyn V. D. Psikhofiziologicheskie issledovaniya individual'nykh razlichii [Psychophysiological researches of individual differences]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 336 p.

Bestuzhev I. V. Rabochaya kniga po prognozirovaniyu [Workbook on prediction]. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 2002. 430 p.

Beshelev S. D., Gurvich F. G. Ekspertnye otsenki [Expert assessments]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 161 p.

Litvak B. G. Ekspertnye otsenki i prinyatie reshenii [Expert assessments and decision-making]. Moscow, Patent Publ., 1996. 271 p.

Shoshin P. B. Metod ekspertnykh otsenok [Expert evaluation method]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1987. 79 p.

Conway J. M. Analysis and design of multitrain-multirater performance appraisal studies. Journal of Management, 1996, V. 22, pp. 139–162. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2063(96)90015-x

Muchinski P. Psikhologiya, professiya, kar'era [Psychology, profession, and career]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 539 p.

Harvey R. J. Job analysis. In: Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. (eds.). Handbook of industrial and organization psychology. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, V. 2, p. 71.

Levine E. L., Sistrunk F., McNutt K. J., and Gael S. Exemplary job analysis systems in selected organizations: A description of process and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1988, V. 3, pp. 3–21. DOI: 10.1007/bf01016745

Pochebut L. G., Chiker V. A. Organizatsionnaya sotsial'naya psikhologiya [Organizational social psychology]. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2002. 298 p.

Gutsykova S. V. Metod ekspertnykh otsenok: teoriya i praktika [Expert evaluation method: theory and practice]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2011. 92 p.

Day D. V., Silverman S. B. Personality and job performance: evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 1989, V. 42, pp. 25–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb01549.x

Ericsson K. A., Krampe R. T., Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 1993, V. 100, pp. 363–406. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363

Kleimanx L. S, Biderman M. D., Faley R. H. An examination of employee perceptions of a subjective appraisal system. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1987, V. 2, pp. 112–121. DOI: 10.1007/bf01014206

Sanchez J. I., De La Torre P. A second look at the relationship between rating and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, V. 81, no. 1, pp. 3–10. DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.81.1.3

Jackson D. J. R, Stillman J. A., Atkins S. G. Rating tasks versus dimensions in assessment centers: A psychometric comparison. Human Performance, 2005, V. 18, pp. 213–241. DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_2

Nasledov A. D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya [Mathematical methods of psychological research]. St. Petersburg, Rech' Publ., 2008. 392 p.

Orlov A. I. Ekspertnye otsenki [Expert assessments]. Moscow, Bauman Moscow State Technical University Publ., 2002. 31 p.