Adaptation and Validation of the Russian Version of G. Clatterbuck’s Attributional Confidence Scale (CL7): Psychometric Properties and Invariance
PDF
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

social perception
attributional confidence
uncertainty
uncertainty-reduction theory
validation
adaptation
mentalization

Abstract

Introduction. There are no Russian-language instruments that assess a person’s confidence in predicting another’s reactions and in the perceived accuracy of one’s representation of that person. Meanwhile, Uncertainty Reduction Theory and Anxiety/Uncertainty Management Theory posit that attributional confidence is an indicator of the quality of interpersonal communication and can predict whether a dialogue will continue or be terminated. Studies measuring attributional confidence most often use G. Clatterbuck’s Confidence in Proactive Attribution (CL7) scale, which has demonstrated good validity and reliability.

Methods. The aim of the study was to adapt and validate the Russian version of Clatterbuck’s Confidence in Proactive Attribution (CL7) questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted on a sample of 166 respondents. Criterion and discriminant validity were examined on two additional samples (N = 82 and N = 81).

Results. We obtained strong evidence for a unidimensional structure of the questionnaire and for the optimality of this structure. Internal consistency was high. Tests of criterion and discriminant validity produced mixed findings for several subscales.

Discussion. The scale meets internal consistency requirements, shows high reliability and adequate validity, and has a one-factor structure, indicating compliance with core psychometric standards and potential applicability in research. Gender invariance and discriminant validity were confirmed. At the same time, results regarding the instrument’s construct validity were unstable.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2025.3.8
PDF
PDF (Russian)

References

Калугин, А. Ю., Щебетенко, С., Мишкевич, А. М., Сото, К. & Джон, О. М. (2021). Психометрика русскоязычной версии Big Five Inventory–2. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18, 7–33. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33

Осин, Е. Н. (2012). Измерение позитивных и негативных эмоций: разработка русскоязычного аналога методики PANAS. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9, 91–110.

Разваляева А. Ю., Польская Н. А. (2021). Психометрические свойства русскоязычной трехфакторной версии опросника межличностной чувствительности. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 29(4), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2021290405

Собчик Л. Н. (2005). Психология индивидуальности. Теория и практика психодиагностики. Речь.

Хухлаев О. Е. & Браткина М. А. (2021). Тревога и неопределенность в межкультурном взаимодействии: экспериментальное исследование. Российский психологический журнал, 15(4), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.4.6

Хухлаев, О. Е., Гриценко, В. В., Дагбаева, С. Б., Константинов, В. В., Корниенко, Т. В., Кулеш, Е. В. & Тудупова, Т. Ц. (2022). Межкультурная компетентность и эффективность межкультурного взаимодействия. Экспериментальная психология, 15(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150106

Antheunis, M., Valkenburg, P. & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005

Baruh, L., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2018). When more is more? The impact of breadth and depth of information disclosure on attributional confidence about and interpersonal attraction to a social network site profile owner. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-1-1

Berger, C. (1968). Sex differences related to self-esteem factor structure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32(4), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0026092

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal Communication: Theoretical Perspectives, Future Prospects. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 415–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02680.x

Berger, C. R. & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x

Birjandi, P. & Siyyari, M. (2016). Agreeableness and Conscientiousness as Predictors of University Students’ Self/Peer-assessment Rating Error. Irish Educational Studies, 35(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.1147973

Carlson, E. N., Vazire, S. & Oltmanns, T. F. (2013). Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 81(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00794.x

Clatterbuck, G. W. (1979). Attributional confidence and uncertainty in initial interaction. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00630.x

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0047358

Duronto, P. M., Nishida, T. & Nakayama, S. (2005). Uncertainty, anxiety, and avoidance in communication with strangers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(5), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.003

Evers, A., Hagemeister, C., Høstmælingen, A., Lindley, P., Muñiz, J. & Sjöberg, A. (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests, Version 4.2.6.

Gudykunst, W. B. (1993). Toward a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 33–71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: Making the mesh of the net finer. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 281–322). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. B. & Nishida, T. (1986). Attributional confidence in low- and high-context cultures. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00090.x

Gudykunst, W. B. & Nishida, T. (2001). Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00042-0

Gudykunst, W. B. & Shapiro, R. B. (1996). Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(96)00037-5

Gudykunst, W. D. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Sage Publications, Inc.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00614.x

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355

Imai, T., Taniguchi-Dorios, E. & Umemura, Tomo. (2021). Relational uncertainty and relationship satisfaction in a romantic relationship: self-disclosure as a moderator and a mediator. Current Psychology, 42, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01478-0

Jensen, A. (1958). The Maudsley personality inventory. Acta Psychologica, 14, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(58)90023-4

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Lee, T. H. & Ng, T. K. (2024). Perceived general similarity and relationship satisfaction: The role of attributional confidence. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3085

Martin, J. & Westie, F. (1959). The tolerant personality. American Sociological Review, 24, 521–528.

Mehrabian, A. & Epstein, N. B. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x

Nadeem, M. U. & Koschmann, M. (2021). Does mindfulness moderate the relationship between anxiety, uncertainty, and intercultural communication effectiveness of the students in Pakistan? Current Psychology, 42, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01429-9

Neuliep, J. W. (2012). The relationship among intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, uncertainty reduction, and communication satisfaction during initial intercultural interaction: An extension of anxiety and uncertainty management (AUM) theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2011.623239

Neuliep, J. (2017). Anxiety/Uncertainty Management (AUM) Theory. In International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0007

Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Oltmanns, J. R., Jackson, J. J. & Oltmanns, T. F. (2020). Personality change: Longitudinal self-other agreement and convergence with retrospective-reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000238

Orben, A. & Dunbar, R. (2017). Social media and relationship development: The effect of valence and intimacy of posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.006

Presbitero, A. & Attar, H. (2018). Intercultural communication effectiveness, cultural intelligence and knowledge sharing: Extending anxiety-uncertainty management theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 67, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.08.004

Raykov, T. (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3204_2

Samochowiec, J. & Florack, A. (2010). Intercultural contact under uncertainty: The impact of predictability and anxiety on the willingness to interact with a member from an unknown cultural group. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(5), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.05.003

Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.

Sheng, Y. & Sheng, Z. (2012). Is coefficient alpha robust to non-normal data? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00034

Stephan, W. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518

Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x

Troldahl, V. C. & Powell, F. A. (1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/44.2.211

Wagner, T. (2018). When off-line seeks information online: The effect of modality switching and time on attributional confidence and social attraction. Communication Research Reports, 35, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1512484

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Psychological Journal