Cognitive Component in the Structure of Students’ Legal Consciousness in the Analysis of Economic Offence Cases
PDF
PDF (Russian)

Keywords

legal consciousness
representations
cognitive skills
logical operations
naive conceptions
scientific concepts
economic offences
corruption
legal socialization
case method

Abstract

Introduction. The cognitive component in the structure of students’ legal consciousness still remains an understudied area. It is unclear how students use the content of representations of economic offences in the analysis of potentially unlawful situations. This study aims to identify and examine the content of cognitive component elements in the structure of students’ legal consciousness in the process of solving economic offence cases (exemplified by corruption risk situations) – namely, representations of corruption, cognitive skills required to recognize it, and characteristics of the relationship between these elements.

Methods. The correlation and regression study involved 119 students of Moscow universities. The diagnosis of variables was performed using authors’ original diagnostic tools (the Open-Ended Questions and the Test of the Ability to Recognize Economic Offences).

Results. We observed significant correlations between the content of students’ representations of economic offences exemplified by corruption (‘knowledge’) and the level of the cognitive ability to identify essential characteristics of economic offences (‘characteristics’) (ρ = 0.438; p ≤ 0.01), as well as between the content of students’ representations of economic offences (‘knowledge’) and the cognitive ability to apply the rule of logical inference when recognizing economic offences in corruption risk situations (‘inference’) (ρ = 0.441; p ≤ 0.01). We found a significant impact of the ‘characteristics’ and ‘inference’ variables on the ‘knowledge’ variable (p < 0.05).

Discussion. For the first time it has been shown that cognitive component elements of legal consciousness related to representations of economic offences are coordinated with each other. To form complete and generalized representations of economic offences among students, it is necessary to develop their cognitive skills that may enable them to (a) analyze problem situations and identify essential characteristics of economic offences and (b) infer whether the situation can be classified as unlawful. The findings of this study may be used to develop training programs aimed at forming the cognitive component of students’ legal consciousness.

https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.2.8
PDF
PDF (Russian)

References

Ameri, T., Burgason, K. A., DeLisi, M., Heirigs, M. H., Hochstetler, A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2019). Legal cynicism: Independent construct or downstream manifestation of antisocial constructs? New evidence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 64, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.008

Ashari, A., Nanere, M., & Trebilcock, P. (2018). Corruption awareness and ethical decision making in Indonesia. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(3), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.15208/BEH.2018.41

Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., MacDougall, A. E., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Mental models and ethical decision making: The mediating role of sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2620-6

Basabose, J. (2019). Anti-corruption education as an alternative approach to corruption. In Anti-corruption education and peacebuilding (pp. 157–194). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03365-1

Becker, K., Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Fostering management education to deter corruption: What do students know about corruption and its legal consequences? Crime, Law and Social Change, 60, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10611-013-9448-8

Bieliauskaite, J., & Slapkauskas, V. (2015). The content of the education of legal consciousness in a comprehensive school: Lithuania’s experience. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.07.071

Bogoyavlenskii, D. N., & Menchinskaya, N. A. (1959). Psychology of knowledge acquisition at school. Moscow: APN RSFSR. (in Russ.).

Bordovskaya, N. V., Koshkina, E. A., Tikhomirova, M. A., & Bochkina, N. (2018). Case method as a tool for evaluation and development of terminological competence of future teachers. Integratsiya obrazovaniya (Integration of Education), 22(4), 728–749. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.093.022.201804.728-749 (in Russ.).

Burton, K. (2017). “Think like a lawyer” using a legal reasoning grid and criterion-referenced assessment rubric on IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v10i2.229

Chen, A., Treviño, L. K., & Humphrey, S. E. (2020). Ethical champions, emotions, framing, and team ethical decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(3), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000437

Chua, L. J., & Engel, D. M. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-LAWSOCSCI-101518-042717

Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (as amended on 17.04.2017, effective 28.04.2017) (2017). Retrieved from http://kodeks.systecs.ru/uk-rf/ (in Russ.).

Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 25.12.2008 No.273-FZ “About Anti-Corruption” (2008). Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82959/ (in Russ.).

Fein, E. (2017). Cognition, cultural practices, and the working of political institutions: An adult developmental perspective on corruption in Russian history. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/BDB0000034

Feldman, Y. (2017). Using behavioral ethics to curb corruption. Behavioral Science & Policy, 3(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/BSP.2017.0015

Fundamental principles of state policy on developing legal knowledge and awareness among citizens (as approved by the President of the Russian Federation on 28.04.2011 N Pr-1168) (2011). Retrieved from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/11139 (in Russ.).

Gal'perin, P. Ya. (1966). Psychology of thinking and the doctrine of gradual formation of mental actions. In E. V. Shorokhova (Ed.), Research of thinking in Soviet psychology (pp. 259–276). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.).

Gerlach, P., Teodorescu, K., & Hertwig, R. (2019). The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000174

Gifford, F. E., & Reisig, M. D. (2019). A multidimensional model of legal cynicism. Law and Human Behavior, 43(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000330

Gulevich, O. A. (2009). The structure of legal conscience and behavior in legal area. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 5. Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru (in Russ.).

Hauser, C. (2019). Fighting against corruption: Does anti-corruption training make any difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3808-3

Kim, J., & Loewenstein, J. (2020). Analogical encoding fosters ethical decision making because improved knowledge of ethical principles increases moral awareness. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04457-w

Kitova, D. A. (2019). Personality representations of social manifestations of corruption. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial'naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya (Institute of Psychology. Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology), 4(1), 155–190. (in Russ.).

Klopfer, L. E., Champagne, A. B., & Gunstone, R. F. (1983). Naive knowledge and science learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514830010205

Louderback, E. R., & Antonaccio, O. (2017). Exploring cognitive decision-making processes, computer-focused cyber deviance involvement and victimization: The role of thoughtfully reflective decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(5), 639–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817693036

Lucariello, J., & Naff, D. (2010). How do I get my students over their alternative conceptions (misconceptions) for learning? Removing barriers to aid in the development of the student. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/misconceptions.aspx?item=1

Lukina, V. S. & Larionova, T. F. (2017). Students’ social representations of corruption. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya (Applied Legal Psychology), 1, 147–154. (in Russ.).

Moscovici, S. (1995). Social representations: historical perspective. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 16(1), 3–18; 16(2), 3–14. (in Russ.).

Orekhova, N. L. (2020). Correlation of the concepts ‘legal culture’ and ‘legal mentality’. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya yurisprudentsiya (Theoretical and Applied Law), 1, 58–65. (in Russ.).

Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Zimmerman, G. (2011). Thoughtfully reflective decision making and the accumulation of capital: Bringing choice back in. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5

Pogarsky, G., Roche, S. P., & Pickett, J. T. (2018). Offender decision-making in criminology: Contributions from behavioral economics. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-CRIMINOL-032317-092036

Pogozhina, I. N., & Pshenichnyuk, D. V. (2020). Development of the cognitive component of anti-corruption competence in students. Voprosy psikhologii, 1, 27–40. (in Russ.).

Rifai, E., Pitriadin, & Triono, A. (2021). The influence of online mass media on anti-corruption legal awareness education. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 12(2), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2021.2.60

Süß, H.-M., & Kretzschmar, A. (2018). Impact of cognitive abilities and prior knowledge on complex problem solving performance – Empirical results and a plea for ecologically valid microworlds. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00626

Talyzina, N. F. (2018). Activity theory of education. Moscow: Moscow University Press. (in Russ.).

Vygotskii, L. S. (1999). Thinking and speech. Moscow: Labirint. (in Russ.).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Pogozhina I. N., Sergeeva M. V.