Abstract
Introduction. This study aims to examine the relationship among the tendency to various forms of cyber-aggression, aggressiveness, and empathy in adolescence. Cyber-aggression is understood as the deliberate infliction of harm on other Internet users. The forms of cyber-aggression are distinguished on the basis of a typological model of cyber-aggression proposed by K. Runions, which was first used to analyze the online behavior of Russian adolescents.
Methods. The study involved 196 adolescents aged between 12 and 15 years. Empirical data were collected using the Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire modified for Russian-speaking respondents, the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire modified by S. N. Enikolopov, and the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale by Mehrabian (modified by N. Epstein).
Results. There was no relationship among the tendency to cyber-aggression, aggressiveness, and empathy, which would be universal throughout the entire adolescence. The tendency to cyber-aggression significantly correlates with aggressiveness after 14 years of age and with empathy after 15 years of age. Aggressiveness is not a significant predictor of adolescent cyber-aggression; empathy determines the tendency to cyber-aggression (with a negative sign) only among 15-year-old adolescents.
Discussion. We assumed that cyber-aggression has different psychological meanings at various stages of adolescence – cyber-aggression as a form of ‘social tests’ in early adolescence, which is not related to personality traits of an individual, and cyber-aggression as a manifestation of stable personality traits (primarily, lack of empathy) in late adolescence.
Conclusion. We can draw a conclusion that there is a need for a differentiated approach to prevention and correction of adolescent cyber-aggression that takes into account its psychological meanings at various stages of adolescence.
References
Álvarez-García, D., Barreiro-Collazo, A., & Núñez, J.-C. (2017). Cyberaggression among adolescents: Prevalence and gender differences [Ciberagresión entre adolescentes: Prevalencia y diferencias de género]. Comunicar, 25, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-08
Ang, R. P., Li, X., & Seah, S. L. (2017). The role of normative beliefs about aggression in the relationship between empathy and cyberbullying. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(8), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116678928
Antipina, S., Bakhvalova, E., & Miklyaeva, A. (2019). Cyber-aggression and problematic behavior in adolescence: Is there connection? In D. Alexandrov, A. Boukhanovsky, A. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova, I. Musabirov (Eds.), Digital transformation and global society. DTGS 2019. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 1038). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_54
Antipina, S. S., Bakhvalova, E. V., & Miklyaeva, A. V. (2019). Gender differences in adolescent cyber-aggression. Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii (The Herzen University Conference on Psychology in Education), 2, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-7 (in Russ.).
Athanasiades, C., Baldry, A. C., Kamariotis, T., Kostouli, M., & Psalti, A. (2016). The “net” of the Internet: Risk factors for cyberbullying among secondary-school students in Greece. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9303-4
Bochaver, A. A., & Khlomov, K. D. (2014). Cyberbullying: Harassment in the space of modern technologies. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics), 11(3), 178–191. (in Russ.).
Bouhnik, D., & Mor, D. (2014). Gender differences in the moral judgment and behavior of Israeli adolescents in the Internet environment. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22979
Corcoran, L., Mc Guckin, C., & Prentice, G. (2015). Cyberbullying or cyber aggression?: A review of existing definitions of cyber-based peer-to-peer aggression. Societies, 5(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020245
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
Enikolopov, S. N., & Tsibul'skii, N. P. (2007). Psychometric analysis of Russian-language version of questionnaire for aggression diagnostics by A. Buss and M. Perry. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 28(1), 115–124. (in Russ.).
Espelage, D. L., Low, S., Polanin, J. R., & Brown, E. C. (2013). The impact of a middle school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.021
Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, I., Smith, P. K., & Calvete, E. (2013). Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic Internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(4), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.030
Gini, G., Card, N. A., & Pozzoli, T. (2018). A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21742
Goldstein, S. E. (2015). Parental regulation of online behavior and cyber aggression: Adolescents’ experiences and perspectives. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(4), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-4-2
Il'in, E. P. (2011). Emotions and Feelings. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russ.).
Len'kov, S. L. (2020). Specifics of destructive cyber aggression in the educational environment. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik (Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin), 4, 107–117. (in Russ.).
Moskvichev, S. A. (2018). Cyberbulling as one of the forms of antisocial behavior in adolescents and young adults. In A. N. Podchernyaev et al. (Ed.), Problems of crime prevention under current conditions (pp. 132–139). Orel: Lukianov Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. (in Russ.).
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., Mero, O., Solera, E., Herrera-López, M., & Calmaestra, J. (2020). Prevalence and psychosocial predictors of cyberaggression and cybervictimization in adolescents: A Spain-Ecuador transcultural study on cyberbullying. PLoS ONE, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241288
Runions, K. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2
Runions, K. C., Bak, M., & Shaw, T. (2017). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ). Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
Sharov, A. A. (2020). Measuring cyber aggression: Development of Russian version of CYBA questionnaire. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya (Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology), 9(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-2-118-125 (in Russ.).
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
Soldatova, G. U., Chigar'kova, S. V., & L'vova, E. N. (2017). Online-aggression and adolescents: Results of research among school students in Moscow and Moscow region. Epokha nauki, 12, 103–109. (in Russ.).
Soldatova, G. U., L'vova, E. N., & Permyakova, I. D. (2018). Phenomena of traditional bulling and cyberbulling: similarities and differences. In R. V. Ershova (Ed.), Digital society as cultural and historical context of human development. Kolomna: State Institute of Social Studies and Humanities. (in Russ.).
Soldatova, G. U., Rasskazova, E. I., & Chigar'kova, S. V. (2020). Types of cyberaggression: Adolescents and youth experience. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal (National Psychological Journal), 2(2), 3–20. (in Russ.).
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Suvorova, O. V., Sorokoumova, S. N., & Frundina, M. N. (2017). Personal determinants of empathy and aggression of modern teenagers. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya (Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education), 56(3), 337–346. (in Russ.).
Wright, M. F. (2017). Adolescents’ perceptions of popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace and cyber aggression: The role of gender. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(6), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0693
Wright, M. F., Aoyama, I., Kamble, S. V., Li, Z., Soudi, S., Lei, L., & Shu, C. (2015). Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies, 5(2), 339–353.
Yusupov, I. M. (1995). Psychology of empathy (theoretical and practical aspects) (Doctoral dissertation). Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg. (in Russ.).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Antipina S. S., Miklyaeva A. V.