Development of Executive Functions Through Play Activities: A Theoretical Overview

Keywords: preschool age, play, executive functions, working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, self-regulation, imagination, object substitution, symbolic tools

Abstract

Introduction. Play is a symbolic space through which children cognize the world around them and master their mental processes. This study considers the potential of play activity for the development of various higher mental functions in preschool-age children.

Theoretical Basis. This section describes working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility as components of executive functions and demonstrates how they are involved in play activity.

Results. This section summarizes: a) correlation studies on the relationship between self-regulation and play; and b) formative experiments that used play activity for the development of executive functions. Correlation studies showed that free play with peers has a complex structure and includes various aspects (role-taking, play substitution of objects and actions, and interaction with peers), which are differently related to the development of executive functions in preschool children. Attention is also given to studies that establish the relationship between children’s imagination in a play situation and the development of executive functions. Formative experiments indicated that a certain level of the development of executive functions is important for the implementation of play activities. At the same time, play activity is a mechanism for the development of executive functions.

Discussion. The authors concentrate on limitations of the analyzed studies. The major drawback they identified is that previous studies of play activity examined its certain components in isolation (object substitution, role-taking, and imaginary situation). This review calls for further research that would identify a number of parameters and undertake a long-term observation to describe play activity of every individual child. Play activity is not simply a context for children’s emotional involvement; it is also important for the symbolic situations of the play to be close to their interests. Thus, the authors establish the complexity of organizing the development of executive functions within formative experiments using play activity. The study emphasizes the great potential of this direction of research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr N. Veraksa, Lomonosov Moscow State University

доктор психологических наук, доцент, и.о. заведующего кафедрой психологии образования и педагогики, член-корреспондент РАО

Daria А. Bukhalenkova, Lomonosov Moscow State University

аспирант кафедры возрастной психологии

Vera А. Yakupova, Lomonosov Moscow State University

кандидат психологических наук, научный сотрудник кафедры методологии психологии

References

Leont'ev A. N. Psychological foundations of preschool play. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie – Psychological Science and Education, 1996, no. 3, pp. 19–31 (in Russian).

Kuczaj S. A. Factors influencing children's hypothetical reference. Journal of Child Language, 1981, V. 8, Issue 1, pp. 131–137. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900003056

Fisher E. P. The impact of play on development: A meta-analysis. Play & Culture, 1992. 5 (2), pp. 159–181.

Istomina Z. M. Razvitie pamyati [Development of memory]. Moscow, Psikhologiya Publ., 1977. 120 p.

Russ S. W., Robins A. L., Christiano B. A. Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 1999, V. 12, Issue 2, pp. 129–139. DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1202_5

Vygotskii L. S. Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In: Psikhologiya razvitiya rebenka [Psychology of child development]. Moscow, Smysl, Eksmo Publ., 2004, pp. 200–223.

Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., Wager T. D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, V. 41, Issue 1, pp. 49–100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

El'konin D. B. Psikhologiya igry [Psychology of play]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1976. 304 p.

Slot P. L., Mulder H., Verhagen J., Leseman P. P. M. Preschoolers' cognitive and emotional self‐regulation in pretend play: Relations with executive functions and quality of play. Infant and Child Development, 2017, V. 26, Issue 6, e2038. DOI: 10.1002/icd.2038

Zyga O. The act of pretending: Play, executive function, and theory of mind in early childhood, 2016. 76 p. URL: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1467391080 (Accessed 30 October 2018).

Elias С. L., Berk L. E. Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2002, V. 17, Issue 2, pp. 216–238. DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00146-1

Ivrendi А. Choice-driven peer play, self-regulation and number sense. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2016, V. 24, Issue 6, pp. 895–906. DOI: 10.1080/1350293X.2016.1239325

Fantuzzo J., Sekino Y., Cohen H. L. An examination of the contributions of interactive peer play to salient classroom competencies for urban head start children. Psychology in the Schools, 2004, V. 41, Issue 3, pp. 323–336. DOI: 10.1002/pits.10162

Mikami A. Y. The importance of friendship for youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2010, V. 13, Issue 2, pp. 181–198. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-010-0067-y

Kelly R., Dissanayake C., Ihsen E., Hammond S. The relationship between symbolic play and executive function in young children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 2011, V. 36, no. 2, pp. 21–28.

Mischel W., Baker N. Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, V. 31, pp. 254–261.

Vieillevoye S., Nader‐Grosbois N. Self‐Regulation during pretend play in children with intellectual disability and in normally developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2008, V. 29, no. 3, pp. 256–272.

Carlson S. M., White R. E., Davis-Unger A. C. Evidence for a relation between executive function and pretense representation in preschool children. Cognitive Development, 2014, V. 29, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.001

White R. E., Carlson S. M. What would Batman do? Self-distancing improves executive function in young children. Developmental Science, 2016, V. 19, Issue 3, pp. 419–426. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12314

Thibodeau R. B., Gilpin A. T., Brown M. M., Meyer B. A. The effects of fantastical pretend-play on the development of executive functions: An intervention study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2016, V. 145, pp. 120–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.001

Sigel I. E. The distancing hypothesis: A causal hypothesis for the acquisition of representational thought. In: M. R. Jones (ed.) Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior, 1968: Effects of early experience. Coral Gables, FL, University of Miami Press, 1970, pp. 99–118.

Veraksa A. N., Gorovaya A. E., Kisel’ A. V. The possibility of using iconic and symbolic tools in teaching (example of the acquisition of the rainbow phenomenon). Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru, 2014, V. 6, no. 2, pp. 19–34 (in Russian). Available at: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2014/2/Veraksa_Gorovaya_Kisel.phtml (Accessed 30 October 2018).

Lillard A. S., Lerner M. D., Hopkins E. J., Dore R. A., Smith E. D., Palmquist C. M. The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, V. 139 (1), pp. 1–34. DOI: 10.1037/a0029321

Pierucci J. M., O’Brien C. T., McInnis M. A., Gilpin A. T., Barber A. B. Fantasy orientation constructs and related executive function development in preschool: Developmental benefits to executive functions by being a fantasy-oriented child. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2014, V. 38, Issue 1, pp. 62–69. DOI: 10.1177/0165025413508512

Qu L., Shen P., Chee Y. Y., Chen L. Teachers’ theory‐of‐mind coaching and children’s executive function predict the training effect of sociodramatic play on children’s theory of mind. Social Development, 2015, V. 24, Issue 4, pp. 716–733. DOI: 10.1111/sode.12116

Shaheen S. How child’s play impacts executive function – related behaviors. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 2014, V. 3, Issue 3, pp. 182–187. DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2013.839612

Smirnova E. O., Veraksa A. N. Relationship between play activity and cognitive development in preschool children. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2018, V. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17759/chp.2018140101

Veraksa A. N., Gorovaya A. E., Leonov S. V., Pashenko A. K., Fedorov V. V. The possibility of using sign and symbolic tools in the development of motor skills by beginning soccer players. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2012, V. 5, pp. 473–497. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2012.0030

Veraksa A. N. Simvolicheskoe oposredstvovanie v poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti [Symbolic mediation in cognitive activity]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 2010. 151 p.

Subbotskii E. V. Stroyashcheesya soznanie [Consciousness under construction]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 423 p.

Veraksa N., Sheridan S. (eds.) Vygotsky’s theory in early childhood education and research: Russian and Western values. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. 219 p.
Published
2019-01-31
How to Cite
Veraksa, A. N., BukhalenkovaD. А., & YakupovaV. А. (2019). Development of Executive Functions Through Play Activities: A Theoretical Overview. Russian Psychological Journal, 15(4), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.4.5
Section
Developmental Psychology