The Role of Self-Relevant Information in Individuals’ Representations of the Self

Keywords: self-representation, self-image, self-appraisal, social interaction, self-relevant information, negative self-representation, transformation of self-representations, social perception, self-knowledge, social behavior

Abstract

Introduction. This paper discusses the role of self-relevant information in individuals’ representations of the self. Self-relevant information is defined here as a type of social information that contains such data about an individual as other people’s opinions, judgements, and attitudes about that person. Critical assessment of the existing knowledge on the relationship between self-relevant information and individuals’ representations of the self shows its insufficiency, especially concerning Russian samples. This paper: (a) considers various concepts of individuals’ perception of self-relevant information, (b) focuses on the known properties of self-relevant information, and (c) describes the procedure and results of an empirical study of the relationship between self-relevant information and individuals’ representations of the self.

Methods. The authors undertook a socio-psychological experiment that employed standardized self-reports and interviews as the means for data collection. Content analysis and repeated measures ANOVA were the data processing methods. The sample consisted of 129 individual participants with a mean age of 19.3 years, 49 % of whom were men.

Results. The respondents perceived social information as self-relevant if it contained a) direct or indirect reference to them; b) information important for their actions and meeting their needs; and c) references to social objects associated with them. The study showed that self-relevant information affects individuals’ self-appraisal and the accuracy of their representations of the self. Negative self-relevant information encourages individuals to seek new social information and to verify it by social comparison.

Discussion. This study, carried out on the Russian sample, enriches our knowledge of individuals’ perception of self-relevant information and our understanding of how self-relevant information may lead to distorting individuals’ representations of the self. The findings offer some criteria for distinguishing self-relevant information from the irrelevant one. The results can be used to further study social identity transformations among participants of Internet communities and to assess threats of online communications in different age groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kirill V. Zlokazov, Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

кандидат психологических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры педагогики и психологии Санкт-Петербургского университета Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации

Nikolai I. Leonov, Udmurt State University

доктор психологических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой социальной психологии и конфликтологии

Roman Yu. Porozov, Ural State Pedagogical University

кандидат культурологии, доцент, доцент кафедры акмеологии и психологии среды Уральского государственного педагогического университета

References

Smith E. R., Queller S. Mental representations. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. USA, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, pp. 111–133. DOI: 10.1002/9780470998519.ch6

Leonov N. I., Glavatskikh M. M. Psikhologiya sotsial'nogo mira [Psychology of the social world]. Izhevsk, Lingua Socialis Publ., 2006. 132 p.

Higgins E. T, Bargh J. A. Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 1987, V. 38, pp. 369–425. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.369

Gergen K. J. The concept of self. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

Leary M. The self as a source of relational difficulties. Self and Identity, 2002, V. 1, Issue 2, pp. 137–142. DOI: 10.1080/152988602317319311

Markus H. R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, V. 98 (2), pp. 224–253. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224

Klein S. B., Gangi C. E., Lax M. L. Memory and self-knowledge in young adults with ADHD. Self and Identity, 2011, V. 10, Issue 2, pp. 213–230. DOI: 10.1080/15298861003741604

Cheek N. N., Norem J. K. Holistic thinkers anchor less: Exploring the roles of self-construal and thinking styles in anchoring susceptibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 2017, V. 115, pp. 174–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.034

Courage M. L., Howe M. L. Autobiographical memory: Individual differences and developmental course. In: Handbook of individual differences in cognition. USA, Springer, 2010, pp. 403–417. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_24

Park J., Uchida Y., Kitayama S. Cultural variation in implicit independence: An extension of Kitayama et al. International Journal of Psychology, 2015, V. 51, Issue 4, pp. 269–278. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12157

Triandis H. C. Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 2001, V. 69, Issue 6, pp. 907–924. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.696169

Amiot C. E., de la Sablonniere R., Smith L. G. E., Smith J. R. Capturing changes in social identities over time and how they become part of the self-concept. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2015, V. 9, Issue 4, pp. 171–187. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12169

Dorfman L. Ya. Self-concept: Differentiation and integration. In: L. Ya. Dorfman (ed.) Integral'naya individual'nost', Ya-kontseptsiya, lichnost' [Integral individuality, self-concept, and personality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2004, pp. 96–123.

Andersen S. M., Chen S. The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 2002, V. 109 (4), pp. 619–645. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.619

Rudman L. A., Spencer S. J. The implicit self. Self and Identity, 2007, V. 6, Issue 2–3, pp. 97–100. DOI: 10.1080/15298860601128271

Kihlstrom J. F., Cantor N. Mental representations of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1984, V. 17, pp. 1–47. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60117-3

Klein S. B. “What is the self?”: Approaches to a very elusive question. Social Cognition, 2012, V. 30, Special issue: What is the self? pp. 363–366. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.4.363

Klein S. B., Chan R. L., Loftus J. Independence of episodic and semantic self-knowledge: The case from autism. Social Cognition, 1999, V. 17, no. 4, pp. 413–436. DOI: 10.1521/soco.1999.17.4.413

Markus H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35 (2), pp. 63–78. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63

Stein K. F., Corte C. Reconceptualizing causative factors and intervention strategies in the eating disorders: A shift from body image to self-concept impairments. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2003, no. 17 (2), pp. 57–66. DOI: 10.1053/apnu.2003.50000

Tskhay K. O., Rule N. O. Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2013, V. 17, Issue 1, pp. 72–86. DOI: 10.1177/1088868312461308

Hinkley K., Andersen S. M. The working self-concept in transference: Significant-other activation and self change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, V. 71 (6), pp. 1279–1295. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1279

McConnell A. R. The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2011, V. 15, Issue 1, pp. 3–27. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310371101

Gaertner L., Sedikides C., Luke M., O’Mara E. M., Iuzzini J., Jackson L. E., Wu Q. A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, V. 48, Issue 5, pp. 997–1013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009

McConnell A. R., Rydell R. J., Brown C. M. On the experience of self-relevant feedback: How self-concept organization influences affective responses and self-evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, V. 45, Issue 4, pp. 695–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.011

Azmat G., Iriberri N. The provision of relative performance feedback: An analysis of performance and satisfaction. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2016, V. 25, Issue 1, pp. 77–110. DOI: 10.1111/jems.12151

Hull J. G., Levy A. S. The organizational functions of the self: An alternative to the Duval and Wicklund Model of self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37 (5), pp. 756–768. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.756

Kuiper N. A., Rogers T. B. Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37 (4), pp. 499–514. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499

Hull J. G., Van Treuren R. R., Ashford S. J., et al. Self-consciousness and the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, V. 54 (3), pp. 452–465. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.452

Rogers T. B., Rogers P. J., Kuiper N. A. Evidence for the self as a cognitive prototype: The “false alarms effect”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, V. 5, Issue 1, pp. 53–56. DOI: 10.1177/014616727900500111

Zlokazov K. V. Konstruirovanie identichnosti i kriminalizatsiya lichnosti [Constructing identity and criminalization of personality]. Ekaterinburg, Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 2017. 142 p.

Yan'shin P. V. Praktikum po klinicheskoi psikhologii. Metody issledovaniya lichnosti [Tutorial on clinical psychology: Personality research methods]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 336 p.

Baumeister R. F., Smart L., Boden J. M. Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 1996, V. 103 (1), pp. 5–33. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5

Rudman L. A., Dohn M. C., Fairchild K. Implicit self-esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, V. 93 (5), pp. 798–813. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.798

Published
2019-01-31
How to Cite
Zlokazov, K. V., Leonov, N. I., & Porozov, R. Y. (2019). The Role of Self-Relevant Information in Individuals’ Representations of the Self. Russian Psychological Journal, 15(4), 70-96. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.4.4
Section
Psychology of personality