Ключевые слова
engineering
mathematics
perspectives
pre-service teacher
technology
sciences
STEM activities
STEM education
teaching STEM
Аннотация
Introduction. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics which is commonly abbreviated as STEM is one of the contemporary teaching and learning approaches in education. STEM is closely related to education in schools. Several studies wanted to find out how STEM influences students in teaching and learning. Research at the level of higher education has not been done much. More specifically, research on STEM among pre-service teachers has not been widely conducted. This study aims to determine how pre-service teachers perceive each aspect of STEM. Methods. The research method used in this research is qualitative. The data collection techniques in this study were interviews with 49 Pre-Service Teachers. The data obtained were then analyzed using coding techniques. Results and Discussion. The results of the data show that Pre-Service Teachers suggest activities of: (1) Involving Science Concept, (2) Making Experiment, (3) Measuring, (4) Observing, (5) Involving Scientific Phenomenon, and (6) Asking Scientific Questions on aspects of science. In the Technology aspect, the activities are: (1) Using Software, (2) Using Computer, (3) Using Internet and (4) Using Smartphone. In the Engineering aspect, the activities are: (1) Designing Problem Solving Procedure, (2) Making Product, and (3) Operating Tool. Meanwhile, in the Mathematics aspect, the activities are: (1) Using Numbers, (2) Calculating, (3) Finding Patterns, and (4) Using Formulas.
Библиографические ссылки
Amany, S. F. (2023). Influence of Models Guided Doscovery Learning on Class VIII Students' Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Mts Ma'arif Nu 04 Tamansari. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 12–22.
Bogdan, R. C., & Bikien, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.
Chiang, F.-K. (2020). A review of the 2019 international STEM in education symposium: Innovative vision for STEM education and teaching. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(5), 1430–1432.
Chiang, F.-K., Wang, L., Zhang, J., Yan, X., Yang, Y., & Chen, L. (2019). Mapping STEM education from 25 years of NSF-funded projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 1594–1604.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc. de las Cuevas, P., García-Arenas, M., & Rico, N. (2022). Why Not STEM? A Study Case on the Influence of Gender Factors on Students’ Higher Education Choice. Mathematics, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020239
Dinh, D. H., & Nguyen, Q. L. (2020). The involvement of gender in STEM training for teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.9.1.363
Falloon, G., Stevenson, M., Beswick, K., Fraser, S., & Geiger, V. (2021). Building STEM in Schools: An Australian Cross-case Analysis. Educational Technology and Society, 24(4), 110–122.
Fung, C.-H. (2020). How Does Flipping Classroom Foster the STEM Education: A Case Study of the FPD Model. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09443-9
Hartmann, F. G., Mouton, D., & Ertl, B. (2022). The Big Six interests of STEM and non-STEM students inside and outside of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103622
Hussin, H., Jiea, P. Y., Rosly, R. N. R., & Omar, S. R. (2019). Integrated 21st century science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education through robotics project-based learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.18510/
hssr.2019.7222
Kefalis, C., & Drigas, A. (2019). Web based and online applications in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(4), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i4.10691
Lee, M.-H., Hsu, C.-Y., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Identifying Taiwanese Teachers’ Perceived Selfefficacy for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Knowledge. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0401-6
Levanova, E. A., Galustyan, O. V, Seryakova, S. B., Pushkareva, T. V, Serykh, A. B., & Yezhov, A. V. (2020). Students’ Project Competency within the Framework of STEM Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 268–276. https://doi.
org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.15933
Liu, Z.-Y., Chubarkova, E., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Online technologies in STEM education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(15), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i15.14677
López-Díaz, M. T., & Peña, M. (2022). Improving Calculus Curriculum in Engineering Degrees: Implementation of Technological Applications. Mathematics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030341
López, L. S., & Cabello, V. M. (2022). Starting at Home: What Does the Literature Indicate about Parental Involvement in Early Childhood STEM Education? Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030218
Lowrie, T., & Larkin, K. (2020). Experience, represent, apply (ERA): A heuristic for digital engagement in the early years. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12789
Makino, M., Suzuki, K., Takamatsu, K., Shiratori, A., Saito, A., Sakai, K., & Furukawa, H. (2018). 3D printing of police whistles for STEM education. Microsystem Technologies, 24(1), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3393-x
Miles, M. B., & A. Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analisis. Sage Publications Beverly Hills London, 1304
Mutmainah, F. (2023). Implementation of Discovery Learning Assisted by Pythagorean Puzzle to Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(2), 100–115.
Morales-Doyle, D., & Gutstein, E. R. (2019). Racial capitalism and STEM education in Chicago Public Schools. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592840
Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Viewpoints of teachers of natural science subjects on stem education at the secondary school level in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(6), 825–843.
Nicol, C., Bragg, L. A., Radzimski, V., Yaro, K., Chen, A., & Amoah, E. (2019). Learning to teach the M in/for STEM for social justice. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 51(6), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01065
Plutzer, E., & Hannah, A. L. (2018). Teaching climate change in middle schools and high schools: investigating STEM education’s deficit model. Climatic Change, 149(3–4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2253-8
Purzer, S., & Shelley, M. (2018). Engineering education in elementary and secondary schools. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(4), I–V. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.440334
Saat, R. M., Fadzil, H. M., Adli, D. S. H., & Awang, K. (2021). Stem teachers’ professional development through scientist-teacher-students partnership (Stsp). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I3.27845
Salar, R. (2021). Awareness and self-efficacy of pre-service science teachers about stem education: A qualitative study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(2).
Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Simó, V. L., Lagarón, D. C., & Rodríguez, C. S. (2020). STEM education for and with a digital era: The role of digital tools for the performance of scientific, engineering and mathematic practices. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(62). https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.410011
Sterrett, W. L., Azam, R. I., Moallem, M., Boersma, J., Bashir, A., Ricanek, K., Saeed, M. A., Butt, I. H., Mahmood, A., Sukhera, S. M., & Gordon, C. R. (2020). Sharing a powerful IDEA: learning organizations collaborating to innovate and design engaging applications in STEM education. Development and Learning in Organizations, 34(2), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-06-2019-0137
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D.
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10798-017-9416-1
Wang, L., & Chiang, F.-K. (2020). Integrating novel engineering strategies into STEM education: APP design and an assessment of engineering-related attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1938–1959. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13031
Yıldırım, B. (2020). MOOCs in STEM Education: Teacher Preparation and Views. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09481-3
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad ‘Azmi Nuha, Ragil Meita Alfathy