Аннотация
Introduction. The paper presents a longitudinal study nearly a half-century long of the dynamics of giftedness from adolescence to maturity. Giftedness is an individual’s ability for creativity. The current study postulates that personal creative achievements can be predicted and that individuals’ ability to develop activities on their own initiative is the unit of such analysis of creativity. The concept of creativity is revealed through this ability as its mechanism. The ultimate forms of creativity are actions that lose the form of response.
Methods. For the purpose of the study, the authors developed a Creative Field technique. This diagnostic tool has certain advantages over other existing tests, as it also measures intelligence according to the learnability criteria. The study was originated in 1970 with a sample comprised of 60 10th grade students of physico-mathematical school № 2 in Moscow. The second stage of the experiment took place in 1976. It employed the new Creative Field technique developed with the use of mathematical content. The third stage of the experiment was conducted during 2002–2003, at which point in time the sample was somewhat reduced due to inaccessibility of a portion of the original participants. The fourth stage of the study of the genesis of giftedness is currently underway (2018-2019).
Results and Discussion. The study produced reliable measures of giftedness in adolescence and maturity and analyzed achievements in participants’ professional activities. These results create an objective framework for analyzing the role of the major life events and personality structure in the realization, and either development or regression of giftedness. The results of the experiments confirmed the relevance of the technique and the validity of the method itself. Students, who reached the highest levels of cognition in the experiment, also made significant discoveries in their professional activities.
Conclusion. The main conclusions are as follows: (a) The method of Creative Field has predictive value. (b) The theory developed by authors is productive.
Библиографические ссылки
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B., Bogoyavlenskaya M. E. Odarennost': priroda i diagnostika [Giftedness: Nature and diagnostics]. Moscow, Obrazovanie lichnosti Publ., 2018. 240 p.
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Creativity and giftedness concepts once again: A methodological approach. In: L. I. Larionova, A. I. Savenkov (eds.) Psikhologiya odarennosti i tvorchestva [Psychology of giftedness and creativity]. Moscow, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2017, pp. 21–36.
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B., Shadrikov V. D. (eds.) Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti [Working concept of giftedness]. Moscow, 2003. 94 p.
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. The nature of creativity without mysticism. In: Filosofiya tvorchestva [Philosophy of creativity]. Moscow, RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 2015, pp. 116–134.
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psikhologiya tvorcheskikh sposobnostei [Psychology of creative abilities]. Samara, Izdatel'skii dom Fedorov Publ., 2009. 416 p.
Vygotskii L. S. Myshlenie i rech': psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Thinking and speech: Psychological investigations]. Moscow, Natsional'noe obrazovanie Publ., 2016. 368 p.
Susokolova I. A. An experience of a psychogenetic study of intellectual activity. Voprosy psikhologii, 1985, no. 3, pp. 154–158 (in Russian).
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B., Zhukova E. S. Longitudinal study of the development of creative abilities during junior and early adolescence. Obrazovanie lichnosti – Personality Formation, 2017, no. 3, pp. 80–89 (in Russian).
Zhukova E. S. Longityudnoe issledovanie tvorcheskikh sposobnostei [Longitudinal study of creative abilities]. Materialy VI S"ezda RPO [Proc. the 6th Congress of the RPO]. Kazan, 2017, Vol. 2, pp. 268–270.
Zhukova E. S. Longityudnoe issledovanie stanovleniya tvorcheskoi lichnosti [A longitudinal study of the development of creative personality]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii: Vospitanie i razvitie lichnosti [Proc. the International Scientific Conference “Education and development of personality”]. Moscow, IRL RAO Publ., 1997, pp. 55–57.
Banzelyuk E. I. Pokazateli kreativnosti i ikh dinamika [Indicators of creativity and their dynamics]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psych.). Moscow, 2008. 213 p.
Banzelyuk E. I. Age dynamics in creativity indicators. Voprosy psikhologii, 2008, no. 3, pp. 55–61 (in Russian).
Danyushevskaya T. I., Bogoyavlenskaya M. E. Studying the dynamics of development of creative abilities. In: Ezhegodnik Rossiiskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva: Psikhologiya segodnya [Yearbook of the Russian psychological society: Psychology today]. Moscow, 1996, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 139–140.
Subotnik R. F., Arnold K. D. (ed.). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Greenwood Publishing Group, 1994. 461 p.
Terman L. M., Oden L. N. The gifted group at mid-life: 35 years follow up of a superior child. Genetic studies of genius, 1959, Vol. V. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press. 950 p.
Torrance E. P. Growing Up Creatively Gifted: A 22-Year Longitudinal Study. Creative child and adult quarterly,1980, no. 3, pp. 148–158.
Torrance E. P. The beyonders in a thirty-year longitudinal study of creative achievement. Roeper review, 1993, no. 3, pp. 131–135.
Benbow C. P., Arjmand O. Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, no. 3, pp. 430–441.
Perleth C., Heller K. A. The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In: R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77–114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1994.
Runco M. A. A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 1999, no. 2, pp. 161–164.
Gottfried A. W., Gottfried A. E., Guerin D. W. The Fullerton Longitudinal Study: A long-term investigation of intellectual and motivational giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2006. Vol. 29. no. 4, pp. 430–450.
Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C. P. Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, no. 3, pp. 484–492.
Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C. Pl. Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010, no. 4, pp. 860–871.
Heller K. A. The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinal study. European journal for high ability, 1991, no. 2, pp. 174–188.
Perleth C., Sierwald W., Heller K. A. Selected results of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness: The multidimensional/typological giftedness model. Roeper Review, 1993, no. 3, pp. 149–155.
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Subject and method of research on creative abilities. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1995, no. 5, pp. 49–58 (in Russian).
Kalmykova Z. I. Produktivnoe myshlenie kak osnova obuchaemosti [Productive thinking as a basis for learning]. Moscow, 1981. 200 p.