Systematically Mapping Connection between Rapid Automatized Naming Task and Reading Performance: A Meta-analysis of Correlational Data
Introduction. This meta-analytical study of primary research on early literacy explores and summarizes patterns of correlation between performance on Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) task and measures of specific reading skills. This is the first large-scale meta-analysis intended to verify claims of the double-deficit hypothesis of relative independence of naming speed and phonological awareness factors in developmental dyslexia and to systematically map specific connection between RAN performance and various literacy competencies.
Method. Two-hundred-forty-one primary studies identified through systematic searches of related empirical literature yielded 1551 effect sizes of two types – cross-sectional (correlations at the same time) and longitudinal (when measures of RAN and reading were considerably separated in time), reflecting RAN-to-reading correlations for seven independent outcome types.
Results. The overall weighted average effect sizes were: r+ = 314, k = 1254 and r+ = 343, k = 297, respectively. Subsequent moderator variable analyses further explored RAN-to-reading associations dependent on RAN type, particular reading skills, age of learners and other factors. Among the strongest and most consistent in both sub-collections were correlation between symbolic RAN and reading speed and between non-symbolic RAN and reading comprehension, whereas both RAN types were strongly associated with decoding skills and reading composite measures.
Discussion. Patterns of RAN-to-reading correlation provided insufficient support for the double-deficit hypothesis, but were suggestive of perceiving RAN as a measure of “pre-reading” skills, an “equal among equals” correlate of reading performance. The study also emphasizes the important role of both automatic and controlled cognitive processes for successful RAN task performance in its connection to reading competency.
Snowling M. J. Dyslexia. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2000. 253 p.
Bishop D. V. M. Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Cambridge, UK, Psychology Press Ltd., 1997. 288 p.
Vellutino F. R. & Fletcher J. M. Developmental Dyslexia. In: M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (eds.) The science of reading: A handbook. Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishing, 2005, pp. 362–378.
Savage R. Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing, 2004, V. 17, Issue 3, pp. 301–324. DOI: 10.1023/B:READ.0000017688.67137.80
Bradley L., & Bryant P. E. Categorizing sounds and learning to read – a causal connection. Nature, 1983, V. 301, pp. 419–421. DOI: 10.1038/301419a0
Fawcett A. (Ed.) Dyslexia, theory and good practice. London, Whurr, 2001. 321 p.
Rayner K., Foorman B. R., Perfetti C. A., Pesetsky D., Seidenberg M. S. How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2001, V. 2, Issue 2, pp. 31–74. DOI: 10.1111/1529-1006.00004
Stanovich K. E. Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers. New York, NY, Guilford Press, 2000. 548 p.
Gallagher A., & Frederickson N. The phonological assessment battery (PhAB): An initial assessment of its theoretical and practical utility. Educational and Child Psychology, 1995, V. 12 (1), pp. 53–67.
Stanovich K. E., Cunningham A. E., & Feeman D. J. Intelligence, Cognitive Skills, and Early Reading Progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 1984, V. 19, no. 3, pp. 278–303. DOI: 10.2307/747822
Bone R. B., Cirino P., Morris R. D. & Morris M. K. Reading and Phonological Awareness in Reading-Disabled Adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2002, V. 21, Issue 3, pp. 306–320. DOI: 10.1207/S15326942DN2103_6
Fleming K. M. The effect of instruction, rapid automatized naming, intellectual functioning, initial phonological awareness skill, and age on phonological awareness growth trajectories. Diss. Dr. Sci. Eugene, OR, 1999. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5353309 (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Wilson J., & Frederickson N. Phonological awareness training: An evaluation. Educational and Child Psychology, 1995, V. 12 (1), pp. 68–79.
Abrami P. C., Borokhovski E., & Lysenko L. V. The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: A meta-analysis of applied field research data. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2015, V. 26 (4), pp. 337–367.
Lu T. The relationship of phonological processing (phonological awareness, verbal short-term memory, and rapid naming) and visual short-term memory to reading disabilities in Chinese children. Diss. Dr. Sci. Iowa City, IA, 2004. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Xiangzhi M., Shuying S., & Xiaolin Z. Phonological awareness, naming speed and Chinese reading. Psychological Science (China), 2004, V. 27 (6), pp. 1326–1329.
de Jong P. F., van der Leij A. Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, V. 95 (1), pp. 22–40. DOI: 10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206
Landerl K. Dyslexia in German-speaking children. In: N. Goulandris (ed.) Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons. London, Whurr Publishers, Ltd., 2003, pp. 15–32.
Lafrance A., & Gottardo A. A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills and reading in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2005, V. 26, Issue 4, pp. 559–578. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716405050307
Veii K. & Everatt J. Predictors of reading among Herero–English bilingual Namibian school children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2005, V. 8, Issue 3, pp. 239–254. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728905002282
van der Leij A., Morfidi E. Core Deficits and Variable Differences in Dutch Poor Readers Learning English. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2006, V. 39, Issue 1, pp. 74–90. DOI: 10.1177/00222194060390010701
Wolf M., Bowers P. G. The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, V. 91 (3), pp. 415–438. DOI: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.115
Lovett M. W., Steinbach K. A., and Frijters J. C. Remediating the Core Deficits of Developmental Reading Disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000, V. 33, Issue 4, pp. 334–358. DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300406
Manis F. R., Doi L. M., Bhadha B. Naming Speed, Phonological Awareness, and Orthographic Knowledge in Second Graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000, V. 33, Issue 4, pp. 325–333. DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300405
Manis F. R., Lindsey K. A., Bailey C. E. Development of Reading in Grades K-2 in Spanish-Speaking English-Language Learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2004, V. 19, Issue 4, pp. 214–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00107.x
Berninger V. W., Abbott R. D., Thomson J. B., & Raskind W. H. Language Phenotype for Reading and Writing Disability: A Family Approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2001, V. 15, Issue 1, pp. 59–106. DOI: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_3
Biddle K. R. Timing deficits in impaired readers: An investigation of visual naming speed and verbal fluency. Diss. Dr. Sci. MA, 1997.
Krug C. H. The diagnostic implications of the double-deficit hypothesis: An investigation of fifth-grade readers classified by phonological awareness and visual naming speed. Diss. Dr. Sci. Medford, MA, 1996. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Meyer M. S., Wood F. B., Hart L. A., Felton R. H. Selective Predictive Value of Rapid Automatized Naming in Poor Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998, V. 31, Issue 2, pp. 106–117. DOI: 10.1177/002221949803100201
Neuhaus G. F., Swank P. R. Understanding the Relations Between RAN Letter Subtest Components and Word Reading in First-Grade Students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002, V. 35, Issue 2, pp. 158–174. DOI: 10.1177/002221940203500206
Petterson S. M. The double-deficit hypothesis: An investigation of isolated word fluency by students classified as single visual naming speed deficit or phonological deficit. Diss. Dr. Sci. Detroit, MI, 2001. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Wolf M., Bowers P. G., Biddle K. Naming-Speed Processes, Timing, and Reading: A Conceptual Review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000, V. 33, Issue 4, pp. 387–407. DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300409
Harn E. A. Examining and predicting response to instruction based on kindergarten children’s early literacy profiles. Diss. Dr. Sci. Eugene, OR, 2000. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Nopola-Hemmi J., Myllyluoma B., Voutilainen A., Leinonen S., Kere J., Ahonen T. Familial dyslexia: neurocognitive and genetic correlation in a large Finnish family. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2002, V. 44, Issue 9, pp. 580–586. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00842.x
Fletcher J. M., Morris R., Lyon G. R., Stuebing K. K., Shaywitz S. E., Shankweiler D. P., Katz L., & Shaywitz B. A. Subtypes of dyslexia: An old problem revisited. In: B. A. Blachman (ed.) Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1997, pp. 95–114.
Tiu R. D., Wadsworth S. J., Olson R. K., & DeFries J. C. Causal Models of Reading Disability: A Twin Study. Twin Research, 2004, V. 7, Issue 3, pp. 275–283. DOI: 10.1375/twin.7.3.275
Schatschneider C., Carlson C. D., Francis D. J., Foorman B. R., Fletcher J. M. Relationship of Rapid Automatized Naming and Phonological Awareness in Early Reading Development: Implications for the Double-Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002, V. 35, Issue 3, pp. 245–256. DOI: 10.1177/002221940203500306
Ackerman P. T., Holloway C. A., Youngdahl P. L., Dykman R. A. The Double-Deficit Theory of Reading Disability Does Not Fit All. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2001, V. 16, Issue 3, pp. 152–160. DOI: 10.1111/0938-8982.00016
Watkins M. W., Kush J. C., Glutting J. J. Discriminant and predictive validity of the WISC-III ACID profile among children with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 1997, V. 34, Issue 4, pp. 309–319. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199710)34:4<309::AID-PITS2>3.0.CO;2-G
Geschwind N. Disconnection syndrome in animals and man (Part I). Brain, 1965, V. 88, pp. 237–294.
Geschwind N. Disconnection syndrome in animals and man (Part II). Brain, 1965, V. 88, pp. 585-644.
Denckla M. B. Color-Naming Defects in Dyslexic Boys. Cortex, 1972, V. 8, Issue 2, pp. 164–176. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(72)80016-9
Denckla M. B., Rudel R. G. Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 1976, V. 14, Issue 4, pp. 471–479. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0
Fawcett A., & Nicolson R. Dyslexia in children: multidisciplinary perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1994a. 272 p.
Mitchell J.-J. Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2001, V. 26, Issue 3, pp. 57–63. DOI: 10.1177/073724770102600305
Nicolson R. I. & Fawcett A. J. Dyslexia screening test. London, The Psychological Corporation, 1996. 63 p.
Denckla M. B., Rudel R. G. Naming of object-drawings by dyslexics and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 1976, V. 3, Issue 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(76)90001-8
Etmanskie J. M. Reading, spelling, and phonological processing in children with phonological or surface reading problems. Diss. Dr. Sci. Kingston, ON, 1999. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Fawcett A. J., Nicolson R. I. Naming Speed in Children with Dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1994, V. 27, Issue 10, pp. 641–646. DOI: 10.1177/002221949402701004
Felton R. H., Naylor C. E., Wood F. B. Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language, 1990, V. 39, Issue 4, pp. 485–497. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(90)90157-C
Aarnoutse C., van Leeuwe J. & Verhoeven L. Early Literacy From a Longitudinal Perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2005, V. 11, Issue 3, pp. 253–275. DOI: 10.1080/08993400500101054
Cronin V., & Carver P. Phonological sensitivity, rapid naming, and beginning reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1998, V. 19, Issue 3, pp. 447–461. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400010262
Scarborough H. S. Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 1998, V. 48, Issue 1, pp. 115–136. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-998-0006-5
Sprugevica I. The impact of enabling skills on early reading acquisition. Diss. Dr. Sci. Universitetet i Bergen (Norway), 2003. Available at: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/1179/Sprugevica_I_The_impact_of_enabling_skills_2002.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Sprugevica I., & Hoien T. Relations between enabling skills and reading comprehension: A follow-up study of Latvian students from first to second grade. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2004, V. 45, Issue 2, pp. 115–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00386.x
Uhry J. K. Kindergarten phonological awareness and rapid serial naming as predictors of grade 2 reading and spelling. In: E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici & T. Lachmann (eds.) Basic functions of language, reading and reading disability. New York, NY, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp. 299–313.
Vellutino F. R., Scallon D., & Sipay E. R. Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: The importance of early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. In: B. A. Blachman (ed.) Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997, pp. 145–162.
Wimmer H., Mayringer H., Landerl K. The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, V. 92 (4), pp. 668–680. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1688
Ackerman P. T., Dykman R. A. Phonological Processes, Confrontational Naming, and Immediate Memory in Dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1993, V. 26, Issue 9, pp. 597–609. DOI: 10.1177/002221949302600910
Badian N. A. Phonemic awareness, naming, visual symbol processing, and reading. Reading and Writing, 1993, V. 5, Issue 1, pp. 87–100. DOI: 10.1007/BF01026920
Badian N. A. Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills, and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 1994, V. 44, Issue 1, pp. 1–25. DOI: 10.1007/BF02648153
Cornwall A. The Relationship of Phonological Awareness, Rapid Naming, and Verbal Memory to Severe Reading and Spelling Disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1992, V. 25, Issue 8, pp. 532–538. DOI: 10.1177/002221949202500808
Bowers P. G., Kennedy A. Effects of Naming Speed Differences on Fluency of Reading after Practice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993, V. 682 (1), pp. 318–320. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb22980.x
de Jong P. F., Vrielink L. O. Rapid automatic naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 2004, V. 54, Issue 1, pp. 65–88. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-004-0004-1
van den Bos K. P. IQ, phonological awareness, and continuous-naming speed related to Dutch poor decoding children’s performance on two word identification tests. Dyslexia, 1998, V. 4, Issue 2, pp. 73–89. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0909(199806)4:2<73::AID-DYS104>3.0.CO;2-#
van den Bos K. P., Zijlstra B. J. H., & van den Broeck W. Specific relations between alphanumeric-naming speed and reading speeds of monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2003, V. 24, Issue 3, pp. 407–430. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716403000213
Patel T. K., Snowling M. J., de Jong P. F. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Children Learning to Read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004, V. 96 (4), pp. 785–797. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1245
Holopainen L., Ahonen T., & Lyytinen H. Predicting Delay in Reading Achievement in a Highly Transparent Language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001, V. 34, Issue 5, pp. 401–413. DOI: 10.1177/002221940103400502
Korhonen T. T. The Persistence of Rapid Naming Problems in Children with Reading Disabilities: A Nine-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995, V. 28, Issue 4, pp. 232–239. DOI: 10.1177/002221949502800405
Lepola J., Poskiparta E., Laakkonen E., & Niemi P. Development of and Relationship Between Phonological and Motivational Processes and Naming Speed in Predicting Word Recognition in Grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2005, V. 9, Issue 4, pp. 367–399. DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0904_3
Näslund J. C., Schneider W. Longitudinal effects of verbal ability, memory capacity, and phonological awareness on reading performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1991, V. 6, pp. 375–392. DOI: 10.1007/BF03172772
Landerl K. Word recognition deficits in German: more evidence from a representative sample. Dyslexia, 2001, V. 7, Issue 4, pp. 183–196. DOI: 10.1002/dys.199
Mayringer H., Wimmer H. Pseudoname Learning by German-Speaking Children with Dyslexia: Evidence for a Phonological Learning Deficit. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2000, V. 75, Issue 2, pp. 116–133. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2525
Wimmer H. Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1993, V. 14, Issue 1, pp. 1–33. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400010122
Wimmer H., Mayringer H. & Landerl K. Poor Reading: A Deficit in Skill-Automatization or a Phonological Deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 1998, V. 2, Issue 4, pp. 321–340. DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0204_2
Clinton A. B. Phonology, orthography, and naming as predictors of reading ability in the Spanish language. Diss. Dr. Sci. Athens, GA, 2001. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Novoa L. Word-retrieval process and reading acquisition and development in bilingual and monolingual children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1988. 231 p.
Chandarina A. S. Acquisition of Reading Skills in Russian-Speaking ESL Children. Diss. Dr. Sci. Toronto, ON, 2003. Available at: https://search.library.utoronto.ca/details?4783141&uuid=79b1f28d-7ca1-460e-a7d7-b4c189fec793 (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Wolf M., O’Rourke A. G., Gidney C., Lovett M., Cirino P., Morris R. The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 2002, V. 15, Issue 1–2, pp. 43–72. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013816320290
Mann V., Wimmer H. Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 2002, V. 15, Issue 7–8, pp. 653–682. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020984704781
Chin C. E. The relations of phonological awareness and visual naming speed to beginning reading skills in at-risk children. Diss. Dr. Sci. Decatur, GA, 2001. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Neuhaus G. F. An investigation of phonological awareness, orthographic recognition, and attention as predictors of rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading. Diss. Dr. Sci. Houston, TX, 2000. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Torgesen J. K. & Burgess S. R. Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal, correlational and instructional studies. In: J. Metsala & L. Ehri (eds.) Word processing in beginning literacy. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 161–188.
Wagner R. K., Torgesen J. K., Rashotte C. A. Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 1994, V. 30 (1), pp. 73–87. DOI: 10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.199
Bishop A. G. Prediction of First-Grade Reading Achievement: A Comparison of Fall and Winter Kindergarten Screenings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2003, V. 26, Issue 3, pp. 189–200. DOI: 10.2307/1593651
Dyer A., MacSweeny M., Szczerbinski M., Green L., Campbell R. Predictors of Reading Delay in Deaf Adolescents: The Relative Contributions of Rapid Automatized Naming Speed and Phonological Awareness and Decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2003, V. 8, Issue 3, pp. 215–229. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eng012
Holland J., McIntosh D., Huffman L. The Role of Phonological Awareness, Rapid Automatized Naming, and Orthographic Processing in Word Reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2004, V. 22, Issue 3, pp. 233–260. DOI: 10.1177/073428290402200304
Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K., Rashotte C. A., Burgess C. & Hecht S. Contributions of Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatic Naming Ability to the Growth of Word-Reading Skills in Second-to Fifth-Grade Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1997, V. 1, Issue 2, pp. 161–185. DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_4
James J. S. Phonological processing in early reading and invented spelling. Diss. Dr. Sci. Kingston, ON, 1996. Available at: PQDT Open (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Kirby J. R., Martinussen R., & Beggs P. Causal Path Analysis of Processes Affecting Early Reading. Canada; Ontario, American Psychological Association, 1996. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED407661.pdf (Accessed 10 March 2018).
Savage R. Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2004, V. 17, Issue 3, pp. 301–324. DOI: 10.1023/B:READ.0000017688.67137.80
Bowers P. G., Swanson L. B. Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1991, V. 51, Issue 2, pp. 195–219. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(91)90032-N
Deutsch G. K., Dougherty R. F., Bammer R., Siok W. T., Gabrieli J. D. E., & Wandell B. Children’s Reading Performance is Correlated with White Matter Structure Measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Cortex, 2005, V. 41, Issue 3, pp. 354–363. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70272-7
Berninger V. W., Yates C., Lester K. Multiple orthographic codes in reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing, 1991, V. 3, Issue 2, pp. 115–149. DOI: 10.1007/BF00420030
Hammill D. D. What We Know About Correlates of Reading. Exceptional Children, 2004, V. 70 (4), pp. 453-469. DOI: 10.1177/001440290407000405
Swanson H. L., Trainin G., Necoechea D. M., Hammill D. D. Rapid Naming, Phonological Awareness, and Reading: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlation Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2003, V. 73, Issue 4, pp. 407–440. DOI: 10.3102/00346543073004407
Young A., & Greig Bowers P. Individual Difference and Text Difficulty Determinants of Reading Fluency and Expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1995, V. 60, Issue 3, pp. 428–454. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1048
Denckla M. B., Cutting L. E. History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 1999, V. 49, pp. 29–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-999-0018-9
Savage R. S., Frederickson N., Goodwin R., Patni U., Smith N., Tuersley L. Relationships Among Rapid Digit Naming, Phonological Processing, Motor Automaticity, and Speech Perception in Poor, Average, and Good Readers and Spellers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2005, V. 38, Issue 1, pp. 12–28. DOI: 10.1177/00222194050380010201
Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., & Rothstein H. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK, Wiley, 2009. 421 p.
Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications, 2017. 360 p.
Bernard R. M., Borokhovski E., Schmid R. F., Tamim R. M., Abrami P. C. A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2014, V. 26, Issue 1, pp. 87–122. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Borokhovski E. F., Bernard R. M. Quantitative syntheses in social sciences: Methodology and practice of meta-analysis. Part 2. Psikhologiya. Ekonomika. Pravo – Psychology-Economics-Law, 2013, no. 3, pp. 41–56.
Borokhovski E. F., Bernard R. M. Quantitative syntheses in social sciences: Methodology and practice of meta-analysis. Part 1. Psikhologiya. Ekonomika. Pravo – Psychology-Economics-Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 6–15 (in Russian).
Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (eds.) Handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY, Russell Sage Foundation, 1994, pp. 231–244.
Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2. Biostat, Englewood NJ, 2005.
Hedges L. V., & Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Boston, MA, Academic Press, 1985. 373 p.
Borokhovski E. Explorations of the rapid automated naming (RAN) task: What should the “A” in RAN stand for? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Montreal, QC, 2007. 330 p. Available at: https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/975691/1/NR31121.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2018).
Stringer R. W., Toplak M. E., Stanovich K. E. Differential relationships between RAN performance, behavioral ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing, 2004, V. 17, Issue 9, pp. 891–914. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-004-2770-x