Аннотация
Введение. Ситуация пандемии явилась вызовом нашим современникам и заострила внимание исследователей на психологических ресурсах, способствующих ее преодолению. Эмпирические исследования системы психологической регуляции жизнедеятельности личности в этот период, отраженные в особенностях инновативных, ценностных и регуляторных характеристик представителей различных социальных групп, достаточно ограничены, что обусловило актуальность и новизну данного исследования. Методы. Использовалась шкала «Самооценка инновативных качеств личности» Н. М. Лебедевой и А. Н. Татарко, позволяющая изучать психологические компоненты, определяющие инновационное поведение человека. Регуляторные характеристики изучались с помощью методики личностной готовности к деятельности С. А. Богомаза, И. В. Атамановой и И. А. Филенко. Ценностные ориентации определялись с помощью опросника Ш. Шварца «Портретный ценностный опросник – Пересмотренный» в модификации К. В. Сугоняева. Для оценки исследуемых показателей в контексте влияния пандемии применялись: критерии различия и сетевой анализ частных корреляций с использованием метода регуляризации EBICglasso. Результаты. Результаты исследования показали значимые изменения в условиях пандемии ряда инновативных, ценностных и регуляторных характеристик, причем большинство из них были связаны с фактором пола. Перестройка сетевой структуры психологических показателей в ходе пандемии идет в противоположных направлениях в группах молодых мужчин и женщин. В женской выборке обнаруживается ослабление умеренных и сильных сетевых взаимосвязей при переходе от 2019 г. к 2020 г., т. е. сетевая структура становится более аморфной. Для мужской выборки наблюдается обратная тенденция – в 2020 г. первоначально аморфная сетевая структура становится многосвязной, структурированной и четко выраженной. Обсуждение результатов. Обсуждаются неспецифические и специфические эффекты влияния пандемии на психологические характеристики, обеспечивающие регуляцию жизнедеятельности, у молодых мужчин и женщин в возрасте от 17 до 28 лет.
Библиографические ссылки
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Arieli, S., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2017). Values and behavior in a work environment: Taking a multi-level perspective. In S. Roccas, L. Sagiv (Eds.), Values and behavior. Taking a cross cultural perspective (pp. 115–141). Springer International Publishing AG.
Artemenkov, S. L. (2021). The issues of construction and analysis of ordered partial correlation networks in psychological research. Modeling and Data Analysis, 11(3), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.17759/mda.2021110303 (in Russ.).
Atamanova, I. V., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2018). Modern university youth personality activity readiness. In Yu. P. Povarenkov (Ed.), Systemogenesis of educational and professional activities. Part I: Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian scientific and practical conference (pp. 134–137). Editorial and publishing department of Yaroslavl Pedagogical University. (in Russ.).
Bykovа, E. A. (2017). Psychological Formation Mechanisms of Students’ Readiness to Innovation Activity. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2017-6-4-294-299 (in Russ.).
Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 91–103.
Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
Fedotova, V. A. (2017). Individual values as predictors of positive or negative attitudes towards innovation among representatives of various generations of Russian people. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 14(4), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2017-4-717-734
Filenko, I. A., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2022). Changing the characteristics of regulatory controls and value orientations of students in the context of a pandemic. Siberian Psychological Journal, 83, 46–66. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/83/3 (in Russ.).
Filenko, I. A., Atamanova, I. V., & Bogomaz, S. A. (in press). Personality readiness for activity (PRA): development and testing of the scale. Experimental Psychology. (in Russ.).
Garcia, A. M. R.-R., & Puga, J. L. (2018). Deciding on Null Hypotheses using P-values or Bayesian alternatives: A simulation study. Psicothema, 30(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.308
Gonzalez-Sanguino, C., Ausin, B., Castellanos, M. Á., Saiz, J., López-Gómez, A., Ugidos, C., & Muñoz, M. (2020). Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.040
Hagan Jr., J. E., Quansah, F., Frimpong, J. B., Ankomah, F., Srem-Sai, M., & Schack, T. (2022). Gender risk perception and coping mechanisms among Ghanaian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10040687
Hussain, K., & Wahab, E. (2021). Reviewing the link between employee creativity, innovative behavior and organizational innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual international conference on industrial engineering and operations management Singapore (pp. 6616–6624). IEOM Society International.
Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
Kenworthy, J. B., Paulus, P. B., Minai, A. A., & Doboli, S. (2021). Divergent and convergent creativity. In S. Doboli, J. B. Kenworthy, A. A. Minai, P. B. Paulus (Eds.), Creativity and Innovation. Understanding Complex Systems (pp. 69–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77198-0_4
Kim, J., & Zhou, F. (2018). Influences of power distance and uncertainty avoidance on innovative work behavior: Mediation effects of self-leadership. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v31i3.669-694
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
Klochko, V. E., & Galazhinsky, E. V. (2009). Psychology of innovative behavior. Tomsk State University. (in Russ.).
Kumar, M., & Bharadwaj, A. (2016). Psychology of innovation: Innovating human psychology? In F. W. Gatzweiler, J. von Braun (Eds.), Technological and institutional innovations for marginalized smallholders in agricultural development (pp. 65–80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25718-1_4
Le, T. T. P., Phan, T. H. P., Hoang, T. N. Q., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2021). The effect of personal values on employee’s innovative behavior in Vietnamese enterprises. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(3), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.804
Lebedeva, N. M., & Tatarko, A. N. (2009). Methodology for the study of the attitude towards innovation of an individual. Almanac of Modern Science and Education, 4–2, 89–96. (in Russ.).
Lebedeva, N. M., Bushina, E. V., & Shmidt, P. (2020). Individual-personal and contextual predictors of organizational creativity in Russia. Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 63–87. (in Russ.).
Leont'ev, D. A., & Osin, E. N. (2014). “Good” and “bad” reflection: From an explanatory model to differential assessment. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 11(4), 110–135. (in Russ.).
Li, L. Z., & Wang, S. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of general psychiatric disorders and loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. Psychiatry Research, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113267
Mandrikova, E. Yu. (2010). Development of a questionnaire for self-organization of activity (QSO). Psychological Diagnostics, 2, 59–83. (in Russ.).
Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100
Osin, E. N., & Leont'ev, D. A. (2020). Brief Russian-language instruments to measure subjective wellbeing: Psychometric properties and comparative analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 117–142. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06 (in Russ.).
Pavlova, E. V. (2020). Psychological correlates of readiness for innovative activity of “person – person” profession students. Bulletin of Amur State University. Series: Humanities, 88, 89–95. (in Russ.).
Perikova, E. I., & Byzova, V. M. (2022). Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the metacognition and emotional intelligence of natural science students. Russian Psychological Journal, 19(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.1.9 (in Russ.).
Perikova, E. I., Atamanova, I. V., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2020). Innovativeness of personality: A study of parameters of psychological system of activity in university youth. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 17(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-719-736 (in Russ.).
Prowse, R., Sherratt, F., Abizaid, A., Gabrys, R. L, Hellemans, K. G. C., Patterson, Z. R., & McQuaid, R. J. (2021). Coping with the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining gender differences in stress and mental health among university students. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650759
Purc, E., & Lagun, M. (2019). Personal values and innovative behavior of employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865
Ratnaningsih, I. Z., Prasetyo, A. R., & Prihatsanti, U. (2016). Predicting innovative behavior among employees in a manufacturing company: The role of psychological capital. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 31(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v31i2.567
Sameer, Y. M. (2018). Innovative behavior and psychological capital: Does positivity make any difference? Journal of Economics and Management, 32(2), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.32.06
Schmidt, P., & Lebedeva, N. (2014). Values, efficacy and trust as determinants of innovative organizational behaviour in Russia. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 21/PSY/2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2493700
Schwartz, S., Butenko, T. P., Sedova, D. S., Lipatova, A. S. (2012). Theory of basic personal values: validation in Russia. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 9(2), 43–70. (in Russ.).
Slåtten, T., Svensson, G., & Sværi, S. (2011). Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees’ creativity and innovative behaviour in frontline service jobs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691111182834
Sortheix, F. M., Parker, P. D., Lechner, C. M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2019). Changes in young Europeans’ values during the global financial crisis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732610
Sousa, C. M. P., & Coelho, F. (2011). From personal values to creativity: Evidence from frontline service employees. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111137598
Sugonyaev, K. V. (2018). The study of the psychometric characteristics of the S. Schwartz’s Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ) in the V. Karandashev’s adaptation of V. Karandashev and its revision. In S. E. Tarazevich (Ed.), Actual problems of ergonomics, habitability and psychological consulting for personnel of special-purpose facilities: Proceedings of the II Intersectoral scientific and practical conference (pp. 186–198). PSTM. (in Russ.).
Wolf, L. J., Haddock, G., Manstead, A. S. R., & Maio, G. R. (2020). The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso12401
Zalevskii, G. V. (2004). Fixed forms of behavior of indiviual and Group systems (in culture, education, science, norm and pathology). Tomsk State University. (in Russ.).
Zinchenko, Yu. P., Morosanova, V. I., Kondratyuk, N. G., & Fomina, T. G. (2020). Conscious self-regulation and self-organization of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(4), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0411
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Copyright (c) 2022 Филенко И. А., Атаманова И. В., Богомаз С. А.