Developing the Technique for Assessing the Degree of Victimization in Adults

Аннотация

Introduction. Victimity is a predisposition to become a victim of crime. Victimization is (a) the event of violence or the experience of violence, (b) the process of a subject’s transformation into a victim of criminal assault, and also (c) the result of this process. The objective of this paper is to describe the procedure of developing a technique for assessing victimization in adults. No attention has been devoted to such techniques (tests) for adults in previous research.

Methods. A combination of external, deductive, and inductive strategies helped to elaborate test tasks intended to assess the degree of victimization. Two contrasting groups (N=389 and N=400) participated in a pilot study. The comparison of the pilot testing results in these groups enabled the authors to select the test tasks for men and women.

Results. The findings confirmed that the developed test met standard reliability criteria (internal consistency and test-retest stability and reliability). The developed test also meets all the known validity criteria such as validation of the test construction process and substantive, obvious, concurrent (diagnostic), consensual, construct, convergent, contrast, and gender validity. The test scales (subtests) diagnose the following seven types of victimization: (i) overall victimization, (ii) implemented victimization, predisposition to (iii) aggressive, (iv) self-destructive, (v) dependent, and (vi) non-critical victimization, and (vii) the degree of a subject’s vulnerability to manipulation.

Discussion. The construct of victimization as diagnosed by this test is positively correlated with the tendency to risky behavior, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem and negatively associated with assertiveness. All this corresponds well to the essence of victimization. The test standardization was carried out on a sample of 563 men and 513 women, representative of the study prospective population in terms of gender, age, education, profession, official capacity, social status, and region of residence. The representativeness of the study samples was confirmed by a normal distribution of test results.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Литература

Vishnevetskii K. V. Victimization: factors, conditions, and levels. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya – Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2014, no. 4, pp. 226–227 (in Russian).

Uludag S., Colvin M., Hussey D., & Eng A. L. Democracy, inequality, modernization, routine activities, and international variations in personal crime victimization. International Criminal Justice Review, 2009, Vol. 19, pp. 265–286.

Andronnikova O. O. Test of tendency to victim behavior. In: Razvitie gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya v Sibiri: Sb. nauch. tr.: V 2ch [Development of humanity education in Siberia: the collection of scientific papers: in 2 parts]. Novosibirsk, NSPI Publ., 2004, Issue 9, Part 1, pp. 11–25.

Finkelhor D., Hamby S., Ormrod R., Turner H. The Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and national norms. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2005, Vol. 29 (4), pp. 383–412.

Dempsey A., Storch E. Relational victimization: The association between recalled adolescent social experiences and emotional adjustment in early adulthood. Psychology in the Schools, 2008, Vol. 45 (4), pp. 310–322.

Betts L. R, Houston J. E, Steer O. L. Development of the Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale-Revised (MPVS-R) and the Multidimensional Peer Bullying Scale (MPVS-RB). Journal Genet Psychology, 2015, Vol. 176 (1–2), pp. 93–109. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1007915

Tynes B., Rose C., Williams D. The Development and Validation of the Online Victimization Scale for Adolescents. Cyberpsychology. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2010, Vol. 4(2). Article 2. Available at: https://
cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4237/3282 (Accessed 24 August 2018).

Chan K. L. Evaluating the Risk of Child Abuse: The Child Abuse Risk Assessment Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2012, Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 951–973. DOI: 10.1177/0886260511423252

Burlachuk L. F. Psikhodiagnostika [Psychodiagnostics]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2010. 384 p.

Nasledov A.D. SPSS. Komp'yuternyi analiz dannykh v psikhologii i sotsial'nykh naukakh [SPSS. Computer data analysis in psychology and social sciences]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2005. 416 p.

Sampson R. J., Lauritsen J. L. Deviant Lifestyles, Proximity to Crime, and the Offender-Victim Link in Personal Violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1990, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 110–139.

Jennings W. G., Piquero A. R., Reingle J. M. On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2012, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 16–26.

Sheinov V. P. Makiavellizm lichnosti: kto umelo manipuliruet lyud'mi [Machiavellian personality: Who expertly manipulates people?]. Moscow, AST Publ.; Minsk, Kharvest Publ., 2012. 416 p.

Sheinov V. P. Development of a questionnaire for assessing the degree of insecurity of an individual from manipulative influences. Voprosy psikhologii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 147–154 (in Russian).

Atik G., Güneri O. Y. Bullying and victimization: Predictive role of individual, parental, and academic factors. School Psychology International, 2013, Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 658–673. DOI: 10.1177/0143034313479699

Mustaine E. E. Victimization risks and routine activities: A theoretical examination using a gender-specific and domain-specific model. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1997, Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–70. DOI: 10.1007/BF02887340

Moon B., McCluskey J. School-Based Victimization of Teachers in Korea. Focusing on Individual and School Characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2016, Vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1340–1361.

Popp A. M., Peguero A. A. Routine Activities and Victimization at School: The Significance of Gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2010, Vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2413–2436. DOI: 10.1177/0886260510383021

Carbone-Lopez K., Esbensen F.-A., Brick B. T. Correlates and Consequences of Peer Victimization: Gender Differences in Direct and Indirect Forms of Bullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2010, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 332–350.

Anastasi A., Urbina S. Psychological Testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997 (Russ. ed.: Anastazi A., Urbina S. Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 688 p.).

Cronbach L. J. Coefficient alpha and intimal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 1981, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334.

Burlachuk L. F., Morozov S. M. Slovar'-spravochnik po psikhodiagnostike [Dictionary-directory of psychodiagnostics]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 528 p.

Gil'bukh Yu. Z. Current problems of the validation of psychological tests. Voprosy psikhologii, 1978, Vol. 5, pp. 108–118 (in Russian).

Campbell D. T. Recommendations for APA tests standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 1960, Vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 546–553.

Lee K. M., Shellman A. B., Osmer S. C., Day S. X., Dempsey A. G. Peer Victimization and Social Anxiety: An Exploration of Coping Strategies as Mediators. Journal of School Violence, 2016, Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 406–423.

Holt M. K., Espelage D. L. Social support as a moderator between dating violence victimization and depression/anxiety among African American and Caucasian adolescents. School Psychology Review, 2005, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 309–328.

Schacter H. L., Juvonen J. Depressive symptoms, friend distress, and selfblame: Risk factors for adolescent peer victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, July 2017, Vol. 51, pp. 35–43.

Buelga S., Cava M. J., Musitu G. Validation of the Adolescent Victimization through Mobile Phone and Internet Scale. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica = Pan American Journal of Public Health, 2012, Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 36–42.

Gaspar Т., Ribeiro J. P., Leal I., Albergaria F., De Matos M. G. Psychosocial Factors Related to Bullying and Victimization in Children and Adolescents. Health Behavior and Policy Review, 2014, Vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 452–459. DOI: 10.14485/HBPR.1.6.3

Cava M. J., Musitu G., Buelga S., Murgui S. The Relationships of Family and Classroom Environments with Peer Relational Victimization: An Analysis of their Gender Differences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2010, Vol. 13,
no. 1, pp. 156–165.

Raigorodskii D. Ya. (ed.) Entsiklopediya psikhodiagnostiki. Psikhodiagnostika vzroslykh [Encyclopedia psychodiagnosis: adult psychodiagnostics]. Samara, Bakhrakh-M. Publ., 2009, Vol. 2. 704 p.

Belova A. N., Shchepetova O. N. (eds.) Shkaly, testy i oprosniki v meditsinskoi reabilitatsii. Gospital'naya shkala trevogi i depressii [Scales, tests, and questionnaires in medical rehabilitation. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale].
Moscow, Antidor Publ., 2002. 400 p.

Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acts Psychiatry Scand, 1983, no. 67 (6), pp. 361–370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

Bodalev A. A., Stolin V. V., Avanesov V. S. Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika [General psychodiagnostics]. St. Petersburgue, Rech' Publ., 2000. 440 p.

Rosenberg М. Self-Esteem Scale. In: J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver (eds.) Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1972, pp. 98–101.

Meshcheryakov B. G., Zinchenko V. P. Bol'shoi psikhologicheskii slovar' [Great psychological dictionary]. St. Petersburg, Praim-Evroznak Publ., 2004. 672 p.

Sheinov V. P. Determinants of assertive behavior. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2015, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 28–37 (in Russian).

Sheinov V. P. Development of the assertiveness test meeting the requirements of reliability and validity. Voprosy psikhologii, 2014, no. 2, pp. 107–116 (in Russian).
Опубликован
2018-09-30
Как цитировать
Sheinov, V. (2018). Developing the Technique for Assessing the Degree of Victimization in Adults. Российский психологический журнал, 15(2/1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.2.1.5
Раздел
Экспериментальная психология