Skip to content
The semiosphere of psychoanalysis: problem statement
Russian Psychological Journal ISSN 1812-1853 · eISSN 2411-5789 · Russian Psychological Society
EN · RU
Practical psychology and psychotherapy Vol. 11 No. 3 (2014)

The semiosphere of psychoanalysis: problem statement

  • Филипп Робертович Филатов Southern Federal University
    Bio

    Associate Professor, General Psychology and Developmental Psychology Department, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy, Southern Federal University, Candidate of Psychological Sciences

Abstract

The author makes an attempt to consider psychoanalysis as a specific practice of sense-creation in the light of Yu. M. Lotman’s theory of semiosphere. The fundamental changes initiated by the psychoanalytic doctrine in various areas of sense-creation, in the very logic, dynamics and dramaturgy of forming cultural and personal senses are discussed. The author emphasizes the role of the psychoanalytic discourse when there is a transition from the logic of fact (Ludwig Wittgenstein’s “Logical-Philosophical Treatise”) to the logic of sense/paradox (Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy). A brief description of the psychoanalytic semiosphere with its properties of heterogeneity, binarity, and asymmetry is offered.

Keywords

  • semiosphere
  • sense-creation
  • logic of sense
  • logic of paradox
  • unconscious
  • semiotic resistance
  • binarity
  • asymmetry

How to Cite

The semiosphere of psychoanalysis: problem statement. (2014). Russian Psychological Journal, 11(3), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2014.3.8