Skip to content
Systematically Searching Empirical Literature in the Social Sciences: Results from Two Meta-Analyses Within the Domain of Education
Russian Psychological Journal ISSN 1812-1853 · eISSN 2411-5789 · Russian Psychological Society
EN · RU
Theory and Methods of Professional Education Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018)

Systematically Searching Empirical Literature in the Social Sciences: Results from Two Meta-Analyses Within the Domain of Education

  • David I. Pickup Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP), Concordia University
  • Robert M. Bernard Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP), Concordia University
  • Eugene Borokhovski ORCID Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP), Concordia University
    Bio
    • Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology, Research Assistant Professor, Psychology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
    • Systematic Reviews Project Manager, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP), Concordia University:

    1515 St. Catherine Street West

    Room S-GA-2.126

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1W1, Canada

  • Anne C. Wade Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP)
  • Rana M. Tamim College of Education, Zayed University

Abstract

Introduction. This paper provides an overview of the information retrieval strategy employed for two meta-analyses, conducted by a systematic review team at Concordia University (Montreal, QC, Canada). Both papers draw on standards first articulated by H.M. Cooper and further developed by the Campbell Collaboration, which promote a comprehensive approach to systematically searching an extensive array of resources (bibliographic databases, print resources, citation indices, etc.) in order to locate both published and unpublished research. The goal is to verify if searching comprehensively through multiple resources retrieves studies that are unique, and hence, improve the overall representativeness of a diverse body of literature. We also analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the results by data source.

Methods. In order to determine the source sensitivity, we consider percentage of results from each source retrieved for full-text review. In order to determine the source specificity, we derive a percentage from the total number of studies included in the final meta-analysis compared against the overall number of initial results found.

Results. Results demonstrate the need to search beyond the subject-specific databases of a particular discipline as unique results can be found in many places. Databases for related disciplines provided 129 unique includes to each meta-analysis, and multidisciplinary databases provided 44 and 99 unique includes for the two meta-analyses in question respectively. Manual search techniques were much more sensitive and specific than electronic searches of databases and yield a higher percentage of final includes.

Discussion. The results demonstrate the utility of a comprehensive information retrieval methodology like that proposed by the Campbell Collaboration, which goes beyond the main subject databases to locate the full range of information sources, including grey literature.

Keywords

  • systematic reviews
  • meta-analysis
  • information retrieval
  • search strategies
  • grey literature
  • bibliographic databases
  • literature search
  • literature reviews
  • librarians

How to Cite

Systematically Searching Empirical Literature in the Social Sciences: Results from Two Meta-Analyses Within the Domain of Education. (2019). Russian Psychological Journal, 15(4), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.4.10